Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12282#issuecomment-214886579
LGTM pending an updated run of the tests
I agree we can update this later after Attributes are exposed in Python.
We want to re-evaluate the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214896931
**[Test build #57032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57032/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214898708
LGTM. Thanks @olarayej - I just had a couple of minor comments about using
`SparkDataFrame`. Other than that this looks good to merge
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214898772
**[Test build #2887 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2887/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12710#issuecomment-214898824
LGTM
Merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712#issuecomment-214903406
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712#issuecomment-214903360
**[Test build #57030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57030/consoleFull)**
for PR 12712 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712#issuecomment-214903401
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712#issuecomment-214903452
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214907846
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214907761
**[Test build #57043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57043/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214907828
LGTM. Merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214907849
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214918994
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214918960
**[Test build #57047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57047/consoleFull)**
for PR 12717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214918989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12721#issuecomment-214921697
**[Test build #57055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57055/consoleFull)**
for PR 12721 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214921714
**[Test build #57056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57056/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214921625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214921623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12282#issuecomment-214889917
**[Test build #57027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57027/consoleFull)**
for PR 12282 at commit
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214890157
@wangmiao1981 sorry for the delay. I agree with @MLnick that the developer
API of ALS is already brittle enough as it stands. One way to still do it is to
add one
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12282#issuecomment-214890036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12282#issuecomment-214890032
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214890020
I'll do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user olarayej commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#discussion_r61168496
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2465,6 +2465,110 @@ setMethod("drop",
base::drop(x)
})
+#' This function
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12713#issuecomment-214893406
**[Test build #57031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57031/consoleFull)**
for PR 12713 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12709#issuecomment-214894951
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12282#issuecomment-214895024
Merging with master
Thanks @zhengruifeng !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214894940
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12709#issuecomment-214895172
Shouldn't this already work in the parser?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12715#issuecomment-214904791
**[Test build #57041 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57041/consoleFull)**
for PR 12715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214904802
**[Test build #57043 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57043/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214911798
**[Test build #57033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57033/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214911921
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#issuecomment-214913744
**[Test build #57044 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57044/consoleFull)**
for PR 12596 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12703#discussion_r61179510
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -112,3 +116,107 @@ case class ExplainCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214887742
**[Test build #57028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57028/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user olarayej commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214890244
@shivaram @felixcheung Looks like the version of lint-r running on the
build server is different than the one on Spark's Github. Even though lint-r
passes on my
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12711#issuecomment-214895988
@jkbradley LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214898218
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214898299
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user olarayej commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214898243
@shivaram @felixcheung I have addressed all your comments. Anything else?
Or shall we merge? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214898290
**[Test build #57034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57034/consoleFull)**
for PR 12604 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214898301
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214898220
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214898213
**[Test build #57032 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57032/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214898151
**[Test build #57033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57033/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214898112
**[Test build #57034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57034/consoleFull)**
for PR 12604 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214903913
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712#issuecomment-214903737
**[Test build #57040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57040/consoleFull)**
for PR 12712 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214905568
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11223#issuecomment-214905547
Moved to #12715
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#discussion_r61176814
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -205,7 +201,7 @@ class SparkSession private(
* @group config
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12713#issuecomment-214911404
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12713#issuecomment-214911403
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12714#issuecomment-214914526
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12714#issuecomment-214914523
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#issuecomment-214914603
**[Test build #57045 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57045/consoleFull)**
for PR 12596 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12703#discussion_r61180561
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -112,3 +116,107 @@ case class ExplainCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10242#issuecomment-214918048
**[Test build #57050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57050/consoleFull)**
for PR 10242 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-214918051
**[Test build #57048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57048/consoleFull)**
for PR 12719 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214918091
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zjffdu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10242#issuecomment-214918065
@jkbradley I made some update based your comments before, but don't have
time to implement the model persistence feature. Please take over this PR.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10242#issuecomment-214918410
**[Test build #57050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57050/consoleFull)**
for PR 10242 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-214918049
**[Test build #57049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57049/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214918093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214921533
**[Test build #57051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57051/consoleFull)**
for PR 12717 at commit
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12721
[SPARK-14940][SQL] Move ExternalCatalog to own file
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`interfaces.scala` was getting big. This just moves the biggest class in
there
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214924901
**[Test build #57057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57057/consoleFull)**
for PR 12689 at commit
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12712
[SPARK-14930][SPARK-13693 Fix race condition in CheckpointWriter.stop()
CheckpointWriter.stop() is prone to a race condition: if one thread calls
`stop()` right as a checkpoint write task begins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12710#issuecomment-214897703
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12710#issuecomment-214897701
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12715#issuecomment-214902311
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12715#issuecomment-214902315
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12715#issuecomment-214902304
**[Test build #57039 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57039/consoleFull)**
for PR 12715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214904807
**[Test build #57042 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57042/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#discussion_r61177026
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -85,27 +85,4 @@ class SQLContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12716#issuecomment-214909072
@liancheng I hit this issue when I tied to create a testcase for the `show
create table` PR. So I created a separate PR to address this issue. Please help
take a look
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12689#issuecomment-214909100
other than the lazy initialization thing this LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12713#issuecomment-214911274
**[Test build #57031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57031/consoleFull)**
for PR 12713 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-21491
**[Test build #57042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57042/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214913414
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214913413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12713#issuecomment-214916386
**[Test build #57046 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57046/consoleFull)**
for PR 12713 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717
[SPARK-14937][ML][Document]spark.ml LogisticRegression sqlCtx in scala is
inconsistent with java and python
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In spark.ml document, the
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-214916566
ping @dbtsai @mengxr Can you take a look? Any more comments or is this
ready to merge now? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214922218
**[Test build #57053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57053/consoleFull)**
for PR 12717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12717#issuecomment-214922321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12721#issuecomment-214922261
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12721#issuecomment-214922257
**[Test build #57055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57055/consoleFull)**
for PR 12721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12721#issuecomment-214922264
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#issuecomment-214922109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214923459
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-214925695
@rxin No problem. Let me just rebase it if it has conflicts anyway. It is
easier to track the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jkbradley closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12420#issuecomment-214885225
By the way, we'll need to get this merged quickly for it to make 2.0.
(Thanks!)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214888704
**[Test build #57028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57028/consoleFull)**
for PR 11569 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#issuecomment-214888718
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
