Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
@HyukjinKwon @shivaram Thanks for your comments. I will fix the URI issue
in this PR as you suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65564/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
**[Test build #65553 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65553/consoleFull)**
for PR 14971 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15136
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65554/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user citoubest commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15135
@petermaxlee
In my opinion, list comprehension can reduce code length to some extent.
It's better if the agg method can support the easy way in api level.
---
If your project is set up
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131#discussion_r79302302
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1426,41 +1426,53 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15137
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65557/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15137
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15137
**[Test build #65557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65557/consoleFull)**
for PR 15137 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131#discussion_r79302542
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1426,41 +1426,53 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65562/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65563/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65564/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65564/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Could you explain the goal of this a bit more?
It looks like:
1. these are not exported functions from the R package
2. these are not documented (`@noRd`) in generated API doc
3.
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139#discussion_r79303509
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -761,27 +761,13 @@ test_that("spark.kstest", {
expect_equal(stats$p.value, rStats$p.value,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
**[Test build #65567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65567/consoleFull)**
for PR 15134 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65567/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65550/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15137
[SPARK-17512][Core] Avoid formatting to python path for yarn and mesos
cluster mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Yarn and mesos cluster mode support remote python
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65562/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r79300109
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -259,6 +260,230 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
**[Test build #65561 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65561/consoleFull)**
for PR 15082 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
Well, I understand your meaning, I'm guessing most of the users they're
using SparkSubmit or SparkLaunch to start application and in that case app name
should be well figured out even if not set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15136
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15136
**[Test build #65554 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65554/consoleFull)**
for PR 15136 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
[SPARK-17583][SQL] Remove unused rowSeparator variable and set
auto-expanding buffer as default for maxCharsPerColumn option in CSV
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
**[Test build #65556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65556/consoleFull)**
for PR 15099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65556/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65570/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
**[Test build #65572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65572/consoleFull)**
for PR 15139 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65573/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
I just took a look. The problematic code is here,
[SparkContext.scala#L1429](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala#L1429).
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15072
Hi @hvanhovell, What do you think about this?
Would this one be like the one we might merge if we can't find any better
way until the next release? or it seems too hacky? I am being
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15097
+1 for adding tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099#discussion_r79299637
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -284,8 +284,12 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15073
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65560/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
**[Test build #65560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65560/consoleFull)**
for PR 15099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65559/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
**[Test build #65559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65559/consoleFull)**
for PR 14597 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
**[Test build #65561 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65561/consoleFull)**
for PR 15082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65561/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #65562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65562/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
**[Test build #65563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65563/consoleFull)**
for PR 14597 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
@junyangq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
@yanboliang
Most methods in context.R are not exported (except `spark.lapply` and
`setLogLevel`) and therefore they are not publically accessible from the R
package.
Does this work
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79303689
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65570/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
@felixcheung
Now I update the scala-side wapper args type as following:
layers: Array[Int],
seed: String
and the seed default value currently I use "", not NULL, because
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
@felixcheung I agree with you and added test to check the R print method is
doing sth. Any more comments, feel free to let me know. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65549/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
**[Test build #65550 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65550/consoleFull)**
for PR 15134 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
**[Test build #6 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/6/consoleFull)**
for PR 15134 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
**[Test build #65556 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65556/consoleFull)**
for PR 15099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65558/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051#discussion_r79299954
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -694,8 +694,14 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
#' }
#' @note spark.mlp since 2.1.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
**[Test build #65559 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65559/consoleFull)**
for PR 14597 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65553/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65558/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
Hm.. It seems it does not trigger the build because the last change does
not include R changes. I manually ran this after checking out your PR in my
forked repo -
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
**[Test build #65565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65565/consoleFull)**
for PR 15099 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
[SPARK-17315][Follow-up][SparkR][ML] Fix print of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
summary
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#14881 added Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test wrapper to SparkR.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
**[Test build #65565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65565/consoleFull)**
for PR 15099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
**[Test build #65569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65569/consoleFull)**
for PR 15138 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
(FYI, I ran another build -
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/HyukjinKwon/spark/build/103-15131-pr)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
I agree we don't need to check the full output but we should check the R
print method is doing something - without a test, we have it broken before.
Generally we should have a test at
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131
**[Test build #65571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65571/consoleFull)**
for PR 15131 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15127
**[Test build #65549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65549/consoleFull)**
for PR 15127 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15136
is `SET LOCATION` the only command that can invalidate the statistics?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597
**[Test build #65563 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65563/consoleFull)**
for PR 14597 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65558/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15134
**[Test build #65567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65567/consoleFull)**
for PR 15134 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
Do you mind if I ask to review this @holdenk and @srowen ? I remember
bumping up the version was reviewed by you both.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139
**[Test build #65568 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65568/consoleFull)**
for PR 15139 at commit
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
@cloud-fan, since this bug fix is important that other patches depends on
this, I am +1 on current approach. Maybe in future, we should consider making
TableIdentifier a unique identifier for all
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15131#discussion_r79303139
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -225,6 +225,42 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(sc, dirName) {
invisible(callJMethod(sc, "setCheckpointDir",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65565/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15139#discussion_r79303313
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -761,27 +761,13 @@ test_that("spark.kstest", {
expect_equal(stats$p.value, rStats$p.value,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
**[Test build #65566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65566/consoleFull)**
for PR 15138 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65566/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
