Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15001#discussion_r79449912
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/ui/ApplicationPage.scala ---
@@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ private[ui] class ApplicationPage(parent:
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
It looks like `SparseMatrix` also raises a `ValueError`. Can you fix that
here also?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15144
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
Thanks! Let me close it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
**[Test build #65605 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65605/consoleFull)**
for PR 15122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
**[Test build #65604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65604/consoleFull)**
for PR 15122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
**[Test build #65603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65603/consoleFull)**
for PR 15150 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
Added test using Option 2 in the end.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user willb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Thanks for the feedback, @srowen! I've made the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
It means that if you do this:
val conf = new SparkConf()
val sc = new SparkContext(conf)
The internal SparkConf of the context will not be the same instance as
`conf`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65602/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
Thanks @gatorsmile. I am merging this fix to branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
**[Test build #65602 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65602/consoleFull)**
for PR 15145 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r79441079
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -101,4 +101,47 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
ok, got it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
LGTM. Pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15114
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65600/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #65600 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65600/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
@petermaxlee Thank you for the suggestions for testing. I will try out
Option 1, since 2 is a bit much work for a minor PR as this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15122
@yhuai The suggestions are for purely testing purposes, to make sure that
StructuredStreaming doesn't check for file existence twice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79421792
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65601/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
**[Test build #65601 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65601/consoleFull)**
for PR 15150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145
**[Test build #65602 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65602/consoleFull)**
for PR 15145 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79419642
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
val partitionId:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79419305
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79419042
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -42,7 +42,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65599/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65599 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65599/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79417214
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Executable.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79417055
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -18,23 +18,43 @@
package
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79416925
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79416074
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79415724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
@yanboliang What went into the decision to use RDD based aggregation? Just
curious, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149#discussion_r79412702
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79413763
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the first
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145#discussion_r79413782
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15115
The only difference was that you're also making 2.7 the default, which
isn't bad or anything. Otherwise i think it was just an oversight. There's way
too much traffic to keep track of unfortunately,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14827
Go ahead and close this one but I think you deserve 'credit' for the JIRA
change, if that makes any difference.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79412313
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,15 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150#discussion_r79412206
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -580,7 +581,15 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
ind +=
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
also just to verify , did you test this with multiple tasks running in the
same executor? Just want to make sure the audit log showed each task properly
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79410775
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1384,14 +1385,15 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* @param ord the implicit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15041#discussion_r79410479
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/Utils.scala
---
@@ -30,10 +34,22 @@ private[spark] object Utils {
* Returns the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149#discussion_r79409985
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/ProbabilisticClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ class
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15115
This seems a duplicate of the #14827 patch I filed 3 weeks earlier.
Is there some aspect of the PR submission process that I'm missing out on?
I would like to get my patches in, and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146
Seems good, but not quite sure, cc @hvanhovell to confirm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79408637
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
**[Test build #65601 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65601/consoleFull)**
for PR 15150 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15146#discussion_r79408325
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +76,23 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
So correct me if I'm missing something but this is actually going to set
the caller context for everything (HDFS and YARN) correct? The caller context
is a static thing you set and its just
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65597/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #65600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65600/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
**[Test build #65597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65597/consoleFull)**
for PR 15149 at commit
GitHub user willb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15150
Use a bounded priority queue to find synonyms in Word2VecModel
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The code in `Word2VecModel.findSynonyms` to choose the vocabulary elements
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r79405860
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -54,11 +55,44 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15071
@hvanhovell I have added a benchmark test for this, could you please help
me to review? thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65599/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659#discussion_r79403168
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2420,6 +2420,44 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65598/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65595/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12819
**[Test build #65598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65598/consoleFull)**
for PR 12819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
**[Test build #65595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65595/consoleFull)**
for PR 14803 at commit
Github user nbeyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15147
@HyukjinKwon I'll have to try out the 2.0.1/master changes. Is this
DateTimeUtils method no longer used anywhere then? The other scenario where I
ran into trouble was using 'cast' on Column class.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r79395037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -49,6 +49,14 @@ class FileStreamSource(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65594/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
**[Test build #65594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65594/consoleFull)**
for PR 14650 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
**[Test build #65597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65597/consoleFull)**
for PR 15149 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
I'm not so familiar with the logic here but tend to trust your analysis and
the other positive review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803#discussion_r79394143
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -197,10 +197,13 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65596/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65596/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15051
**[Test build #65596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65596/consoleFull)**
for PR 15051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14803
**[Test build #65595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65595/consoleFull)**
for PR 14803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65592/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731
**[Test build #65592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65592/consoleFull)**
for PR 14731 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
I'm not concerned about people deleting partitions before messages have
been processed, because they can take care of that problem themselves, by
not deleting things until consuming has
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376216
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ import org.apache.ivy.plugins.matcher.GlobPatternMatcher
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376168
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -73,37 +94,55 @@ private[mesos] class
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650#discussion_r79376179
--- Diff:
mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/mesos/MesosClusterDispatcherArguments.scala
---
@@ -18,23 +18,43 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
**[Test build #65594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65594/consoleFull)**
for PR 14650 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15145#discussion_r79375663
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65593/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15149
**[Test build #65593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65593/consoleFull)**
for PR 15149 at commit
301 - 400 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
