Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
retest this please.
This one has not yet passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14788#discussion_r82701507
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -2548,16 +2548,20 @@ object functions {
def to_date(e: Column): Colum
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
**[Test build #66682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66682/consoleFull)**
for PR 15421 at commit
[`349a47b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66682/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
**[Test build #66683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66683/consoleFull)**
for PR 15386 at commit
[`6259438`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15386
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66683/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
[SPARK-17860][SQL] SHOW COLUMN's database conflict check should respect
case sensitivity configuration
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SHOW COLUMNS command validates the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
**[Test build #3320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3320/consoleFull)**
for PR 15395 at commit
[`52b2b7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
@zsxwing All tests passed in previous try:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3317/consoleFull,
I kicked another.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
**[Test build #66692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66692/consoleFull)**
for PR 15423 at commit
[`3acd08f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15190
**[Test build #66685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66685/consoleFull)**
for PR 15190 at commit
[`f2b93de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15190
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66685/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15190
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7898
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7898
Close this as we've stopped development for MLlib.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
**[Test build #66693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66693/consoleFull)**
for PR 13675 at commit
[`3079996`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15072#discussion_r82704021
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -53,7 +53,15 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
private[sql] objec
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316
**[Test build #66687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66687/consoleFull)**
for PR 15316 at commit
[`2c5de3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15316
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66687/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
**[Test build #66686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66686/consoleFull)**
for PR 15421 at commit
[`83726fc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66686/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #66689 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66689/consoleFull)**
for PR 14702 at commit
[`c7741f9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66689/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12374
Thanks @jkbradley!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15190
cc @yhuai @cloud-fan Based on the above PR discussion, it sounds like this
PR is ok to merge. What do you think? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66694/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
[`b747b23`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15388
ping @rxin @hvanhovell @cloud-fan @gatorsmile any else need to address?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15360
Will review this tonight. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285
ping. any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82706375
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache Lice
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82706401
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBasedBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache Lice
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
>> BufferedInputStream supports mark/reset, while we are not doing so here
- does deserialization and other codepaths depend on this ? (If not for
functionality, then for performance ?)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66695/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
[`5eed34f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66695/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
[`5eed34f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66695/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82706656
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82706767
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66696/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
[`681ff62`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82706830
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82706923
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82706974
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82707120
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
**[Test build #66691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66691/consoleFull)**
for PR 15422 at commit
[`f810937`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82707181
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66691/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82707355
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15295
**[Test build #66697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66697/consoleFull)**
for PR 15295 at commit
[`8d93c4a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82707725
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -56,7 +57,12 @@ case class StateStoreRestoreExec(
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
**[Test build #66698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66698/consoleFull)**
for PR 15422 at commit
[`f810937`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82708148
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -176,7 +184,9 @@ class StreamExecution(
//
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82708289
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -176,7 +184,9 @@ class StreamExecution(
//
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82708317
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -176,7 +184,9 @@ class StreamExecution(
//
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82708346
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -221,8 +247,15 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
**[Test build #66693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66693/consoleFull)**
for PR 13675 at commit
[`3079996`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13675
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66693/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82708496
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -530,7 +692,7 @@ class StreamExecution(
case o
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
@mallman I think this will be a vital part of Spark 2.1. There are more
work that depends on this one and I want to make sure those will be done.
On the Databricks side, @ericl has been testing
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82709228
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamMetrics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82709451
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamMetrics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82709478
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamMetrics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82707347
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -477,6 +478,15 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
cat
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82707709
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82707684
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82708474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/SessionFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Ap
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82709034
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -619,6 +620,44 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf:
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82708580
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PruneFileSourcePartitions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
We should also flag protect this (I am thinking of resolving to a
ListingFileCatalog when disabled), definitely until a directory metadata cache
is added back.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15416#discussion_r82710433
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -298,10 +298,11 @@ class Analyzer(
case other
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
**[Test build #66699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66699/consoleFull)**
for PR 15375 at commit
[`62ab47b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
[`d692e71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Adding an explicit cache call btw -- can actually slow things down due to
bad memory management.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15424
[SPARK-17338][SQL][follow-up] add global temp view
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
address post hoc review comments for
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15424
cc @rxin @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15395
**[Test build #3320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3320/consoleFull)**
for PR 15395 at commit
[`52b2b7d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15424
**[Test build #66701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66701/consoleFull)**
for PR 15424 at commit
[`b93841b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@rxin yeah, as I tried adding explicit cache call doesn't improve it. So I
remove it then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82712965
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -477,6 +478,15 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
c
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82713068
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
**[Test build #66692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66692/consoleFull)**
for PR 15423 at commit
[`3acd08f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66692/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66700/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
[`d692e71`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82713318
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
yea, making the parquet reader support case-insensitive field resolution is
an ultimate solution, but I think dropping the support for reading mixed-case
parquet files for catalog tables is also a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66700/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
**[Test build #66702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66702/consoleFull)**
for PR 15421 at commit
[`9e621eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
@shivaram can I nominate this patch for 2.0 branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
501 - 600 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
