Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #3461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3461/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16127
The my comment was
> Hi, @rxin , @gatorsmile , @hvanhovell , @srowen .
> Could you give some opinion? What I hoped here is having these 6 commits
in branch-1.6.
> But, if backports
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90601340
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
**[Test build #69555 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69555/consoleFull)**
for PR 15795 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69559/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16118
**[Test build #69560 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69560/consoleFull)**
for PR 16118 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69562/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90600774
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90600716
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,38 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
I'm sure this will be net positive, and _shouldn't_ cause any regression.
Still, we must be certain. @AnthonyTruchet can you provide for posterity the
detailed test results for the vector sizes you
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
cc @wangmiao1981 @felixcheung @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030#discussion_r90619967
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetPartitionDiscoverySuite.scala
---
@@ -969,4 +969,15 @@ class
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030#discussion_r90620033
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -174,22 +185,18 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030#discussion_r90620001
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -174,22 +185,18 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Do you happen to know if the changes to the SBT build will still work with
earlier versions of SBT? that is, is it just some cleanup or some required
change?
Regarding plugins, maven
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
**[Test build #69555 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69555/consoleFull)**
for PR 15795 at commit
Github user yanboliang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16058
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69554/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
**[Test build #69554 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69554/consoleFull)**
for PR 16110 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
**[Test build #69554 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69554/consoleFull)**
for PR 16110 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90600966
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,38 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116#discussion_r90609056
--- Diff:
repl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoaderSuite.scala ---
@@ -118,8 +115,17 @@ class ExecutorClassLoaderSuite
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
**[Test build #69561 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69561/consoleFull)**
for PR 16116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12968
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
L-BFGS is the only optimizer I've used so far. I'm not sure how much time I
can free to take care of the other ones, but I'll try :-)
Regarding the bench, I'll check if we have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Build started: [Tests] `org.apache.spark.repl.ExecutorClassLoaderSuite`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16118
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69560/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16118
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16118
**[Test build #69560 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69560/consoleFull)**
for PR 16118 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
**[Test build #69557 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69557/consoleFull)**
for PR 16116 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69556/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
**[Test build #69556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69556/consoleFull)**
for PR 16117 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69553/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
@brkyvz How should we handle this query? I think we have some overheads to
check the constant value (`1480617712537`) in path matches all the data in
DataFrame and to throw an exception if illegal
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
CC @yanboliang ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69549/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16110
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69548/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69550/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69552/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69557/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69558/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69558/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
I didn't find any failure/error message in the PR Builder job logs apart
from:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./dev/run-tests-jenkins.py", line 232, in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
**[Test build #69563 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69563/consoleFull)**
for PR 16115 at commit
Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
ping @holdenk @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69564/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69562/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69562/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030#discussion_r90620083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -132,13 +132,24 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69565/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
cc @srowen and @mridulm, Could I please ask to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16058
Since we decided revert SPARK-18291 for 2.1 and add it back after
SPARK-18618 resolved, I can directly add this change at that time. So I will
close this PR. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your
GitHub user vijoshi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
reuse SparkSession if sparkContext specified same as active one
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Change is for SQLContext to reuse the active SparkSession during
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
**[Test build #69553 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69553/consoleFull)**
for PR 16115 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
**[Test build #69557 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69557/consoleFull)**
for PR 16116 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
**[Test build #69556 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69556/consoleFull)**
for PR 16117 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16117
[SPARK-18686][SparkR][ML] Several cleanup and improvements for spark.logit.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Several cleanup and improvements for ```spark.logit```:
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69558/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076#discussion_r90603174
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -60,152 +60,37 @@ MLlib is under active development.
The APIs marked `Experimental`/`DeveloperApi` may change in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
**[Test build #69559 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69559/consoleFull)**
for PR 16076 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116#discussion_r90604612
--- Diff:
repl/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/ExecutorClassLoaderSuite.scala ---
@@ -118,8 +115,17 @@ class ExecutorClassLoaderSuite
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
**[Test build #69559 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69559/consoleFull)**
for PR 16076 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69555/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16118
[SPARK-18291][SPARKR][ML] Revert "[SPARK-18291][SPARKR][ML] SparkR glm
predict should output original label when family = binomial."
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16115
**[Test build #69553 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69553/consoleFull)**
for PR 16115 at commit
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795#discussion_r90736878
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1478,3 +1478,139 @@ for more details on the API.
{% include_example python/ml/chisq_selector_example.py %}
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15795#discussion_r90736862
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1478,3 +1478,139 @@ for more details on the API.
{% include_example python/ml/chisq_selector_example.py %}
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16113#discussion_r90739276
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -605,34 +629,64 @@ class StreamExecution(
case
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16124
[SPARK-12446][SQL] Add unit tests for JDBCRDD internal functions
No tests done for JDBCRDD#compileFilter.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO
Closes #10409 from
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16124
This is the first commit for #16021.
cc @gatorsmile .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125
**[Test build #69597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69597/consoleFull)**
for PR 16125 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16123
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16124
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16128
[SPARK-18671][SS] Added tests to ensure stability of that all Structured
Streaming log formats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To be able to restart StreamingQueries
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16127
**[Test build #69604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69604/consoleFull)**
for PR 16127 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16092
**[Test build #3465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3465/consoleFull)**
for PR 16092 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16125
**[Test build #69596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69596/consoleFull)**
for PR 16125 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16113#discussion_r90743054
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -605,34 +629,64 @@ class StreamExecution(
case
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16076
LGTM
I'll merge this with master and branch-2.1
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16113#discussion_r90743078
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQuery.scala ---
@@ -32,21 +32,33 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16113
**[Test build #69593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69593/consoleFull)**
for PR 16113 at commit
101 - 200 of 500 matches
Mail list logo