Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16272
**[Test build #70107 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70107/consoleFull)**
for PR 16272 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
**[Test build #70108 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70108/consoleFull)**
for PR 16270 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r92286111
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -455,15 +458,10 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232#discussion_r92289268
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeKVExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -96,13 +98,35 @@ public UnsafeKVExternalSorter(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232#discussion_r92289384
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeKVExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -96,13 +98,35 @@ public UnsafeKVExternalSorter(
Github user bdwyer2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247#discussion_r92289217
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
enableHiveSupport = TRUE,
...) {
+ if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
**[Test build #70099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70099/consoleFull)**
for PR 16270 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70104/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
**[Test build #70111 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70111/consoleFull)**
for PR 16266 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16272#discussion_r92279982
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/progress.scala ---
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
**[Test build #70104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70104/consoleFull)**
for PR 16270 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16271
**[Test build #70100 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70100/consoleFull)**
for PR 16271 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
**[Test build #70106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70106/consoleFull)**
for PR 16273 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16246#discussion_r92286561
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -136,24 +142,36 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #70096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70096/consoleFull)**
for PR 16189 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018
Thanks for pinging about this---it looks important!
One request: Do you know if there is a resource with a clearer statement of
this precise algorithm for the L2 norm? That'd be nice to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70098/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70099/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16149
@srowen @sethah
Thanks for all the helpful discussions!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70097/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16195
@daisukebe can you close the PR please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270#discussion_r92284372
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ import scala.language.existentials
Github user daisukebe closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255#discussion_r92293834
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -416,8 +418,8 @@ object ColumnPruning extends
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018#discussion_r92298204
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -344,27 +344,30 @@ class IsotonicRegression private
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70122/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
**[Test build #70123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70123/consoleFull)**
for PR 16274 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70123/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
okay, I'll try to fix in that way, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #70122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70122/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r92335449
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,93 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r92337930
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -400,10 +402,19 @@ def toLocalIterator(self):
>>> list(df.toLocalIterator())
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
Good point. This make me think of the usage of `instr.logParams(params:
_*)` in training instrumentation [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671].
IMIO, params are copied from its
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277#discussion_r92331760
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -557,9 +562,10 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277
**[Test build #70125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70125/consoleFull)**
for PR 16277 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263#discussion_r92332668
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -400,10 +402,19 @@ def toLocalIterator(self):
>>> list(df.toLocalIterator())
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
@srowen, I think it is ready for a second look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
After an offline discussion with @liancheng , here is the result:
**Why does the test fail?**
1. We write a parquet file with schema `[a: long, b: int]` to path
`/data/a=1`.
2.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70121/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277
[SPARK-18854][SQL] numberedTreeString and apply(i) inconsistent for
subqueries
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a bug introduced by subquery handling.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018#discussion_r92331409
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala
---
@@ -344,27 +344,30 @@ class IsotonicRegression private
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277#discussion_r92331508
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -534,19 +539,16 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16277
cc @yhuai @liancheng @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vijoshi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119#discussion_r92333556
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -72,8 +72,13 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, sparkSession=None,
jsqlContext=None):
self._sc
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16142
cc @vanzin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16176
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16257
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16246
**[Test build #70110 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70110/consoleFull)**
for PR 16246 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16246
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70110/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16246
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Jenkins retest this please
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM UCB AMPLab wrote:
> Test FAILed.
>
>
> Refer to this link for build results (access
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
But yes other Spark config properties would be set by the user in
sparkConfig parameter of sparkR.session method. We would just add to that
without adding another parameter to sparkR.session
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70115/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16176
Thanks for the review. @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #70122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70122/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915#discussion_r92322708
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStoreSuite.scala ---
@@ -303,6 +303,34 @@ class MemoryStoreSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
**[Test build #70123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70123/consoleFull)**
for PR 16274 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
@maropu @brkyvz Sorry for the delay, I was blocked by some other tasks
during the last a few days.
@cloud-fan and I just did some investigation and we think we came up with a
minimal fix
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
**[Test build #70106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70106/consoleFull)**
for PR 16273 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Can you also add a test into MemoryStoreSuite?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
Thanks for submitting this. We need a much better description for both the
JIRA ticket and the pull request. If I understand it correctly, you are fixing
an issue to support broadcasting blocks that
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
cc @zsxwing also
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16275
[SPARK-18588][Tests]Ignore KafkaSourceStressForDontFailOnDataLossSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Disable KafkaSourceStressForDontFailOnDataLossSuite for now.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
**[Test build #70117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70117/consoleFull)**
for PR 16253 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
**[Test build #70111 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70111/consoleFull)**
for PR 16266 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
**[Test build #70112 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70112/consoleFull)**
for PR 16273 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
**[Test build #70113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70113/consoleFull)**
for PR 16274 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16266
Build started: [TESTS] `org.apache.spark.ShuffleSuite`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
**[Test build #70115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70115/consoleFull)**
for PR 15915 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70117/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255
**[Test build #70114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70114/consoleFull)**
for PR 16255 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70114/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
Current change looks good to me. cc @JoshRosen @srowen to check it again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16247
But yes _other_ Spark config properties would be set by the user in
sparkConfig parameter of sparkR.session method. We would just add to that like
```
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r92329696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -877,6 +877,35 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70106/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16270
**[Test build #70108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70108/consoleFull)**
for PR 16270 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70105/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16273
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16274
**[Test build #70113 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70113/consoleFull)**
for PR 16274 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255
**[Test build #70114 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70114/consoleFull)**
for PR 16255 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16275
**[Test build #70116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70116/consoleFull)**
for PR 16275 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70109/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user saturday-shi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16253
> Looks like a compile-time check for the listener API.
I think that's right. I was confused with the test suites in Scala. But
this is for Java.
---
If your project is set up for
101 - 200 of 472 matches
Mail list logo