Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16409
**[Test build #70612 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70612/testReport)**
for PR 16409 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16409
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70612/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70620/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
**[Test build #70617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70617/testReport)**
for PR 16404 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898349
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898300
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70626/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #70626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70626/testReport)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
[SPARK-19005][SQL] Keep column ordering when a schema is explicitly
specified
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to keep column ordering when a schema is explicitly
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #70613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70613/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
> Should use dataType.containsNull for allowNull?
no we shouldn't, `containsNull` is kind of an optimizing hint that
guarantees the value will not be null, and it's guaranteed by the
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
@cloud-fan Hmm, I agree that it's guaranteed by the source, but I thought
that's why we should use `containsNull` for `allowNull` to guarantee the value
will not be null when `containsNull == false`
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
@yhuai @hvanhovell @cloud-fan @gatorsmile Could you please review this PR
when you have time? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70624/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405#discussion_r93886149
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ PATHS_TO_CHECK="./python/pyspark/
./examples/src/main/python/ ./dev/sparktestsup
# TODO: fix pep8
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405#discussion_r93886392
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ PATHS_TO_CHECK="./python/pyspark/
./examples/src/main/python/ ./dev/sparktestsup
# TODO: fix pep8
GitHub user cnZach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16412
[SPARK-19006][DOCS]mention spark.kryoserializer.buffer.max must be less
than 2048m in doc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
On configuration doc
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70613/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #70613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70613/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user Kevy123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16413
Branch 1.3
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #70621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70621/testReport)**
for PR 15721 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16413
Hi @Kevy123, it seems this pull request is mistakenly open. Could you
please close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70622/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70622/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373
@yhuai @hvanhovell @gatorsmile Would you please review this PR when you
have time? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #70621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70621/testReport)**
for PR 15721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392#discussion_r93894368
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391
**[Test build #70619 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70619/testReport)**
for PR 16391 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898018
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898130
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898210
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +510,94 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
I'll try and take a more detailed look later on tonight.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user xiaochang-wu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16411
[SPARK-17984][YARN][Mesos][Deploy][WIP] add executor launch prefix support
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Complete Standalone, Yarn, Mesos support from #15579 and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16412
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70616/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70616/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70616/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70618/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70618/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70618/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70620/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70620 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70620/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
@ueshin That will be a big mess if we validate the null here and there, I
think we should only do it at the source side. If we do not trust the source
side, there are a lot of other places that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70614/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #70623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70623/testReport)**
for PR 15721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
@cloud-fan Hmm, I didn't mean we don't trust the source side.
Currently we DO validate the null regardless of `allowNull` value.
The difference by the `allowNull` is setting null or
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
I'm looking into the failure...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
**[Test build #70625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70625/testReport)**
for PR 16392 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #70626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70626/testReport)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16409
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
**[Test build #70615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70615/testReport)**
for PR 16402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16411
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
**[Test build #70617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70617/testReport)**
for PR 16404 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891849
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -182,34 +182,18 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891892
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -224,4 +208,59 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891859
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -182,34 +182,18 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891724
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -1810,52 +1810,23 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891824
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/NaiveBayesSuite.scala
---
@@ -157,50 +162,26 @@ class NaiveBayesSuite extends
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891797
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/NaiveBayesSuite.scala
---
@@ -25,31 +25,36 @@ import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891844
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -18,15 +18,15 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.util
import
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721#discussion_r93891833
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +49,11 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70622/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16413
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70614/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70615/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392#discussion_r93896288
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -262,7 +252,7 @@ class
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16388#discussion_r93897706
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +408,15 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
**[Test build #70624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70624/testReport)**
for PR 16405 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898653
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -551,17 +551,26 @@ class SessionCatalog(
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70624/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70614/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
cc @srowen, could I please ask to review this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r93898801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -860,6 +864,24 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16409#discussion_r93898675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCWriteSuite.scala ---
@@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ class JDBCWriteSuite extends SharedSQLContext with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16405
Ah, this seems complaining in Python 3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391
**[Test build #70619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70619/testReport)**
for PR 16391 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16397
Here, I concatenated all the logs into single file -
https://gist.github.com/HyukjinKwon/58567451773f87322c7009007e4fdc34
I just found each in PR description.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
**[Test build #70623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70623/testReport)**
for PR 15721 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16402
**[Test build #70615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70615/testReport)**
for PR 16402 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70619/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320#discussion_r93897319
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchemaSuite.scala
---
@@ -114,4 +114,11 @@ class
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16344
@srowen @yanboliang
Any additional issues regarding this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 302 matches
Mail list logo
