Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70713/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70713/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #70717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70717/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70718/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #70719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user mpjlu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
[SPARK-17645][MLLIB][ML][FOLLOW-UP] document minor change
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr for #15212 to address @jkbradley comments on
Document change.
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
[SPARK-19027][SQL] estimate size of object buffer for object hash aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In object hash aggregate, we fall back to sort based
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
cc @yhuai @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
@mpjlu Thanks for the follow-up PR. @jkbradley Please feel free to shepherd
that PR, since I'm on travel these days. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Thanks @jkbradley , I will send a follow-up PR for your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
**[Test build #70721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/testReport)**
for PR 16434 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
hi @jkbradley @yanboliang , I have created a follow up PR for this PR.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
I have not added FDR test in ML Suite. The main reason is the current data
set is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
**[Test build #70722 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/testReport)**
for PR 16435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
**[Test build #70721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/testReport)**
for PR 16434 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70721/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
@jkbradley @srowen any comments on the changes? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
**[Test build #70722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70722/testReport)**
for PR 16435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16425
Yeah it contains the 'originals' of some graphics IIRC so we can leave it
for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94139716
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94141624
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16428
Do you mind if I ask wheather it writes the line separstor correctly as the
encoding specified in the option?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16377
ping @sethah
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user imatiach-msft opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
[SPARK-18698][ML][MLLIB] Adding public constructor that takes uid for
IndexToString
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on SPARK-18698, this adds a public
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
**[Test build #70713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70713/testReport)**
for PR 16371 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
**[Test build #70714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70714/testReport)**
for PR 16431 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
**[Test build #70714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70714/testReport)**
for PR 16431 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70712/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
**[Test build #70715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70715/testReport)**
for PR 16432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70716/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70716/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70714/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
**[Test build #70718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70718/testReport)**
for PR 16433 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
**[Test build #70715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70715/testReport)**
for PR 16432 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70709/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70708/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417#discussion_r94109872
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -92,46 +89,53 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70711/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70707/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16431
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70710/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
**[Test build #70718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70718/testReport)**
for PR 16433 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
[SPARK-19022][TESTS] Fix tests dependent on OS due to different newline
characters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two tests failing on Windows due to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16371#discussion_r94114431
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -44,39 +44,78 @@ abstract class Collect
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
**[Test build #70719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70719/testReport)**
for PR 16422 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70716/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #70717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70717/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70715/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16433
Build started: [TESTS]
`org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryStatusAndProgressSuite`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70717/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16430
**[Test build #70720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70720/testReport)**
for PR 16430 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
@mengxr @jkbradley @MLnick @HyukjinKwon @holdenk would you be able to take
a look at the changes - it looks like you have previously modified
StringIndexer.scala file.
---
If your project
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170820
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170722
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ new data.
### Saving to Persistent Tables
`DataFrames` can also be saved as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this `CREATE TABLE ... LOCATION` document issue when you
have sometime?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this `createTempViewCommand` PR again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16320
Could you review this `CSVInferSchema` issue again, @gatorsmile ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
> Note this is compatible with the views defined by older versions of
Spark(before 2.2), which have empty defaultDatabase and all the relations in
viewText have database part defined.
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16389
Can we just not reset `numRunningTasks` to 0? I think it should include
speculative tasks and we can add a comment about it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436#discussion_r94174586
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StringIndexerSuite.scala ---
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ class StringIndexerSuite
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r94175664
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -568,10 +617,9 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15212
Will do!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
[SPARK-19028] [SQL] Fixed non-thread-safe functions used in SessionCatalog
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed non-thread-safe functions used in SessionCatalog:
-
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
A related PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12915
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16434#discussion_r94165525
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2629,6 +2629,8 @@ class ChiSqSelector(JavaEstimator, HasFeaturesCol,
HasOutputCol, HasLabelCol, Ja
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16374
Some operators (e.g., window) may still need to use these RDD, dropping
them will slow your application. That's why `DStream` uses `rememberDuration`
to filter RDDs.
You can [tune the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664
Thank you for deep review again, @viirya and @gatorsmile .
I'll update the PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16436
**[Test build #70723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70723/testReport)**
for PR 16436 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16437
cc @zsxwing @cloud-fan @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16424#discussion_r94170967
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -526,11 +526,18 @@ By default `saveAsTable` will create a "managed
table", meaning that the locatio
be
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
