Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
**[Test build #71280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71280/testReport)**
for PR 16566 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
**[Test build #71281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71281/consoleFull)**
for PR 16565 at commit
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541#discussion_r95921320
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -589,6 +590,171 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
ok thanks~ I am working to find out the reason why it failed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16467
**[Test build #71283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71283/testReport)**
for PR 16467 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
@yhuai I was trying to do that yesterday and found that JIRA went something
wrong, will try again later today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71282/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
**[Test build #71282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71282/testReport)**
for PR 16566 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
okay!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
Could you change the PR title to `[SPARK-17237][SQL][Backport-2.0] Remove
backticks in a pivot result schema`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16524
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
**[Test build #71287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71287/testReport)**
for PR 16550 at commit
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16542#discussion_r95935489
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/JobScheduler.scala
---
@@ -200,19 +200,19 @@ class JobScheduler(val ssc:
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95935452
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500#discussion_r95937423
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -392,7 +392,9 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
```
* checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
Duplicated \argument entries in documentation object 'fitted':
'object' 'method' '...'
```
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
**[Test build #71289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71289/testReport)**
for PR 16355 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512#discussion_r95938844
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ test_that("create DataFrame from RDD", {
expect_equal(dtypes(df),
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564#discussion_r95938778
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -898,11 +899,15 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16542
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
**[Test build #71292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71292/testReport)**
for PR 16528 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16542
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71292/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16542
**[Test build #71288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71288/testReport)**
for PR 16542 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
**[Test build #71292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71292/testReport)**
for PR 16528 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16559
we already have `GetArrayItem` and `GetMapValue`, and we have special
parser rules to support it, e.g. `SELECT array_col[3], map_co['key']`. We can
just treat `index` as an alias if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71289/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
Could you also update the JIRA and the PR description after your changes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
Discussed with @tdas offline. Regarding the changes to the append mode,
it's unknown that if adding the filter is better because it will apply the
filter on all rows but there are usually only few
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
**[Test build #71278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71278/testReport)**
for PR 16557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71278/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541#discussion_r95923580
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -307,54 +307,11 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71281/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
**[Test build #71281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71281/consoleFull)**
for PR 16565 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16546#discussion_r95927063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +120,32 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Thanks for the updates!
For docConcentration and quantileProbabilities, I agree it could be
problematic if these are too large. How about:
* We don't log docConcentration since that
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16524
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16527
I use following code log trim stages/jobs time consuming:
```:scala
/** If stages is too large, remove and garbage collect old stages */
private def trimStagesIfNecessary(stages:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
**[Test build #71284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71284/testReport)**
for PR 16503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16542
**[Test build #71288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71288/testReport)**
for PR 16542 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
@jkbradley thanks, I've updated the code based on your latest comments - I
removed k and the verification for the setters.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355
**[Test build #71289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71289/testReport)**
for PR 16355 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15324
@jkbradley What's your opinion about whether GNB should be a separated
Classifier or a modeltype in existing NB?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
[SPARK-17237][SQL] Remove backticks in a pivot result schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Pivoting adds backticks (e.g. 3_count(\`c\`)) in column names and, in some
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
**[Test build #71282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71282/testReport)**
for PR 16566 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
@yanboliang Updated! Thanks for reviewing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
Thanks for the feedback! Ah, sure, let me update accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71283/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95933009
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -52,7 +55,43 @@ private[spark] class TaskDescription(
val
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564#discussion_r95942576
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -898,11 +899,15 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71276/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564
**[Test build #71275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71275/testReport)**
for PR 16564 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564
Discussed with @marmbrus offline and decided to not support using
`df("col")` like `ds.dropDuplicates("_1").select(ds("_1").as[String],
ds("_2").as[Int])`.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564
Also cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user tygert commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16556
Maybe @hl475 could add his remark about how "we don't use LAPACK here since
there is no pivoted QR in LAPACK that stops when the rank is exhausted" to the
inline comments he highlighted?
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512#discussion_r95910083
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ objectFile <- function(sc, path, minPartitions = NULL) {
#' will write it to disk and send the file
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512#discussion_r95909536
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -128,12 +135,15 @@ parallelize <- function(sc, coll, numSlices = 1) {
objectSize <- object.size(coll)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71277/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95916520
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
[SparkR]: add bisecting kmeans R wrapper
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add R wrapper for bisecting Kmeans.
As JIRA is down, I will update title to link
Github user infinitymittal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498
Hi,
There is the limitation of "Can't insert bucketed data into existing hive
tables.". Do we have any plans to relax the same? I want to insert data using a
query into an already
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15018
@zapletal-martin Pinging since you wrote the original PR: There's
discussion here about whether IsotonicRegression should support negative
weights. Is there a good reason to? I haven't seen
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
**[Test build #71280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71280/testReport)**
for PR 16566 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71280/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16208
@sureshthalamati Could you resolve the conflicts in both PRs? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16514#discussion_r95928814
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -555,6 +557,61 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95929443
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/view.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
Let me think whether we can improve the existing verification mechanism for
both caches in the test cases. It can help us to know what the caches actually
contain.
---
If your project is set
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
I'll update JIRA once the service is back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
LGTM, merging to master!
It conflicts with branch-2.1, can you send a new PR? thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512#discussion_r95939102
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ test_that("create DataFrame from RDD", {
expect_equal(dtypes(df),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71284/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
**[Test build #71284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71284/testReport)**
for PR 16503 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
@jkbradley Updated. Thanks for reviewing!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71286/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541#discussion_r95922004
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -589,6 +590,171 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71279/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541#discussion_r95923248
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -307,54 +307,11 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500#discussion_r95929082
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -392,7 +392,9 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #71285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71285/testReport)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16467
**[Test build #71283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71283/testReport)**
for PR 16467 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71286/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #71285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71285/testReport)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
**[Test build #71291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71291/testReport)**
for PR 16557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481
**[Test build #71279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71279/testReport)**
for PR 16481 at commit
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541#discussion_r95923927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -589,6 +590,171 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355#discussion_r95928035
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -160,6 +162,17 @@ object KMeansSuite {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16355#discussion_r95928023
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/BisectingKMeansSuite.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +54,21 @@ class BisectingKMeansSuite
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
@ash211
Thanks a lot for your comment. I've already fixed the failing Scala style
tests. Running `./dev/scalastyle` passed. Could you give another look?
---
If your project is set up for
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
