Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
Avoid leak SparkContext in Signaling.cancelOnInterrupt
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Signaling.cancelOnInterrupt` leaks a SparkContext per call and it makes
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
@sethah @imatiach-msft Could you take another look and let me know if there
are any additional changes needed on this PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16825
**[Test build #72472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72472/testReport)**
for PR 16825 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> I'll double check, but I don't think
spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions=false would solve this issue since
we're still deriving the file relation's dataSchema parameter from the schema
of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
**[Test build #72470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/testReport)**
for PR 16625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72473 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72473/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r99531422
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -298,6 +299,8 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
**[Test build #72427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72427/testReport)**
for PR 16476 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13379
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r99534181
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
def
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
[SPARK-17213][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Re-enable Parquet filter tests for binary and
string
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to enable the tests for Parquet
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
cc @liancheng, could you see if it makes sense?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
**[Test build #72430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72430/testReport)**
for PR 16817 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
**[Test build #72431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72431/testReport)**
for PR 16476 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72431/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
LGTM if tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72429/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99538768
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1797,6 +1797,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99540244
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -49,10 +49,6 @@ component-specific configuration namespaces used to
override the default setting
Component
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72426/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72425/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
**[Test build #72427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72427/testReport)**
for PR 16476 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72427/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72429/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r99534380
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72428/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r99535380
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -31,10 +31,17 @@ import
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r99535960
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,99 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
**[Test build #72431 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72431/testReport)**
for PR 16476 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386
can we focus on supporting multiline json in this PR? We can leave the
improvements in new PRs, or this PR is kind of hard to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72429/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
Thank you, @cloud-fan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99540452
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -394,8 +410,7 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
[SPARK-19451][SQL][Core] Underlying integer overflow in Window function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
reproduce code:
```
val tw =
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
**[Test build #72432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72432/testReport)**
for PR 16818 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72433/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16819
[SPARK-16441][YARN] Set maxNumExecutor depends on yarn cluster resources.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Dynamic set `spark.dynamicAllocation.maxExecutors` by cluster
501 - 557 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
