Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17018
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17018
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73237/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17018
**[Test build #73237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73237/testReport)**
for PR 17018 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16979#discussion_r102335119
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -63,8 +63,34 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17018
**[Test build #73237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73237/testReport)**
for PR 17018 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73235/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73235/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17018
[SPARK-19684] [DOCS] Remove developer info from docs.
This commit moves developer-specific information from the release-
specific documentation in this repo to the developer tools page on
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r102330772
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73229/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73230/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73229/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17002
Yeah. Will be more careful in the future. Sorry for that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user e-m-m commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Wow, thanks for the quick answer, @Yunni! Sounds great. I'll definitely be
using it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73226/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73223/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
**[Test build #73226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73226/testReport)**
for PR 16499 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499
**[Test build #73223 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73223/testReport)**
for PR 16499 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991#discussion_r102324213
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerBus.scala
---
@@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ class
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Hi @e-m-m, I think the Python API will be included in Spark 2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Anyone I can ping to help get this merged? The PR is going on a
month old at this point and I know that lack of STS support is an issue that
several interested parties would like to see get
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16970
**[Test build #73236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73236/testReport)**
for PR 16970 at commit
Github user e-m-m commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Hey, super excited about this feature! Was actually thinking of writing
this, myself, until I saw this. What version of Spark is this slated to hit the
Python API? Thanks :)
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73224/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #73224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73224/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user eric-mccaleb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Hey, super excited about this feature! Was actually thinking of writing
this, myself, until I saw this. What version of Spark is this slated to hit the
Python API? Thanks :)
---
If your
Github user eric-mccaleb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Hey, super excited about this feature! Was actually thinking of writing
this, myself, until I saw this. What version of Spark is this slated to hit the
Python API? Thanks :)
---
If your
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Many thanks @kayousterhout and @markhamstra.
Also minor scala style issue is fixed with new patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Thanks for working on this, however I'm not sure if we want to go with this
approach. In Spark 2.2, I think we should consider deprecating the manifest
files and instead use deterministic file
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73235/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73234/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73234/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73234/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73233/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73233/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015
**[Test build #73233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73233/testReport)**
for PR 17015 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
nope, he's not in the admin list. i'll add him now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Thanks, Shane & Kay!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Awesome thanks Shane!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73232/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #73232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73232/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
@shaneknapp is @markhamstra on the Jenkins whitelist? Wanted to double
check since his attempt to trigger the build above didn't work
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73222/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16977
**[Test build #73222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73222/testReport)**
for PR 16977 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
@erenavsarogullari the reason this was happening on past PRs is that Imran
and I weren't on the Jenkins whitelist (which neither of us realized -- and has
since been fixed). I think Mark is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
**[Test build #73232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73232/testReport)**
for PR 16905 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73231/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user Naresh523 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10405
I'm seeing similar logs errors [1] on spark v1.6.0.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12339
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73231/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r102308292
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16905
Thanks @markhamstra.
I encounter the same problem in my every PR and tech-ops team helps to
trigger Jenkins. Problem may be related with Github Jenkins PR Builder plugin.
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Pinging participants from #16797 once more to get any feedback on the new
proposal: @gatorsmile, @viirya, @ericl, @mallman and @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16945
@felixcheung I have made suggested changes. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16970
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16970
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73225/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16970
**[Test build #73225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73225/testReport)**
for PR 16970 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015#discussion_r102303660
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -349,36 +350,42 @@ object CatalogTypes {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73231/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17015#discussion_r102302366
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -138,27 +153,35 @@ case class HiveTableScanExec(
Github user JasonMWhite commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896
Ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004#discussion_r102300022
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedWriteSuite.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,29 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.sources
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16608#discussion_r102299867
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -163,9 +163,11 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
lgtm assuming tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004
LGTM with a minor nit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17004#discussion_r102298105
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/BucketedWriteSuite.scala
---
@@ -20,19 +20,29 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.sources
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
@windpiger :
- what does `throw exception(...)` mean ? Operation is supported OR not ?
it might throw exception but the operation itself might have happened.
- for 2nd point, you said
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #73230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73230/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16978
**[Test build #73229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73229/testReport)**
for PR 16978 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73228/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73228/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16946
trying to get some eyes on this: @squito
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Jenkins, ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r102292628
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
// Task
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73228/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r102292835
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -911,14 +916,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867#discussion_r102293021
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -911,14 +916,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user dding3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r102294384
--- Diff: docs/graphx-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ messages remaining.
> messaging function. These constraints allow additional
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r102289626
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1018,7 +1025,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r102293681
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -317,6 +317,9 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
/**
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16499#discussion_r102293219
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -843,7 +852,15 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r102292537
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -122,27 +125,39 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73227/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73227/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
**[Test build #73227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73227/testReport)**
for PR 17017 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17017
@felixcheung
Simple example to illustrate this
```
df <- suppressWarnings(createDataFrame(iris))
df[[1:2]]
```
Instead of issuing warning and taking the first element,
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r102290972
--- Diff: docs/graphx-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ messages remaining.
> messaging function. These constraints allow additional
301 - 400 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
