Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73401/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73407/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73402/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73398/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73404/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73399/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73406/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73410/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73408/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73409/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73403/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73403/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73411/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Jenkins retest this please
last failure was weird termination of jenkins:
```
[info] NaiveBayesClusterSuite:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Jenkins retest this please
The failure in last run was from SparkR tests. All SQL tests had passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73412/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Seems a flaky test, let me trigger the build
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032#discussion_r102899614
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ library(SparkR)
sparkR.session(appName = "SparkR-ML-glm-example")
#
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73413/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73422/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976#discussion_r102913028
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVSuite.scala
---
@@ -961,56 +978,135 @@ class CSVSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #73415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73415/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976#discussion_r102914694
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -269,3 +273,89 @@ private[csv] class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976#discussion_r102916301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73413/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #73415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73415/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
**[Test build #73416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73416/testReport)**
for PR 16907 at commit
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
@hvanhovell @gatorsmile I agree that would be a better solution however I
don't know how to achieve that being unfamiliar with this code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17046
LGTM - merging to 2.1. Thanks!
Can you close?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17046
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17046
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73415/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907#discussion_r102896255
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/api/r/SQLUtils.scala
---
@@ -48,13 +48,14 @@ private[sql] object SQLUtils extends Logging {
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73417/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73411/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976#discussion_r102913767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73424 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73424/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
**[Test build #73414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73414/testReport)**
for PR 17051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73418/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #73419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73419/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73423 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73423/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Hi @marmbrus, does this sounds good to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Let me update this after https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976 gets
merged as that changes the related code path rapidly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jaceklaskowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17042
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17042
Makes sense. Thanks @srowen!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057#discussion_r102916099
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1952,4 +1952,54 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
**[Test build #73414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73414/testReport)**
for PR 17051 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r102897015
--- Diff: docs/graphx-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -708,7 +708,9 @@ messages remaining.
> messaging function. These constraints allow additional
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73420/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
[SPARK-19724][SQL]create a managed hive table with an existed default
location should throw an exception
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This JIRA is a follow
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73421/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055#discussion_r102915883
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1952,4 +1952,49 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
**[Test build #73416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73416/testReport)**
for PR 16907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73421/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73418/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17027
**[Test build #73425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73425/testReport)**
for PR 17027 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
It seems too tirival. The `default` seems even always `null`. I don't think
this is an improvement if there is no other specific reason. The original codes
are more readable to me.
---
If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73422/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73420/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user HarshSharma8 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
Refactored code to remove null representation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed the null value that was returned directly with null representation
and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73423/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73423/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73426/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17057
**[Test build #73428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73428/testReport)**
for PR 17057 at commit
Github user HarshSharma8 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
May be this is right and readable from your point of view, this code is
returning nothing else, just null again and again as default value if user
along its other values are not present.
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052#discussion_r102922775
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -393,6 +393,17 @@ case class
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052#discussion_r102922659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ case class Range(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73417/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
