Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17401
**[Test build #75322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75322/testReport)**
for PR 17401 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75313/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
**[Test build #75313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75313/testReport)**
for PR 17406 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15192
sure. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75320/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #75320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75320/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458
They are suggestions in my point of view. it doesn't necessarily mean you
should follow if there are some reasons.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17442
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17442
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75321/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17442
**[Test build #75321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75321/testReport)**
for PR 17442 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457#discussion_r108475528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SessionState.scala ---
@@ -160,15 +140,36 @@ class SessionStateBuilder(
* Session
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17442
**[Test build #75321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75321/testReport)**
for PR 17442 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75312/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
**[Test build #75312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75312/testReport)**
for PR 17208 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
**[Test build #75320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75320/testReport)**
for PR 17170 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
ISTM the solution you suggested does not work because the planner actually
compares references (that is, `AttributeReferences` output by
`child.outputPartioning`) instead of `Alias`. So, IMO we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16985
**[Test build #75319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75319/testReport)**
for PR 16985 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user johnc1231 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459
[SPARK-20109][MLlib] Added toBlockMatrixDense to IndexedRowMatrix
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
-I added the method `toBlockMatrixDense` to the IndexedRowMatrix
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450
**[Test build #75318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75318/testReport)**
for PR 17450 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
@sitalkedia This change is pretty contentious, there are lot of questions
about whether or not this is a good change. I don't think discussing this here
in github comments on a PR is the best form.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108441341
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108450311
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108442588
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108449521
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108441411
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108442407
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17398
**[Test build #75317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75317/testReport)**
for PR 17398 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17398#discussion_r108448204
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -581,17 +592,24 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75311/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
**[Test build #75311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75311/testReport)**
for PR 17457 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #75316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75316/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75314/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #75314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75314/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #75314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75314/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13932
**[Test build #75315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75315/testReport)**
for PR 13932 at commit
Github user shubhamchopra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13932
Rebased to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406
**[Test build #75313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75313/testReport)**
for PR 17406 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406#discussion_r108441033
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -169,30 +169,76 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435#discussion_r108437512
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -57,7 +57,25 @@ def __ne__(self, other):
@classmethod
def typeName(cls):
-
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458
Probably, I guess this should be fine. Just in my experience, IntelliJ's
inspection was quite okay except the case of breaking Scala 2.10. It might be
better if they can be manually tested via
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17406#discussion_r108434080
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -169,30 +169,76 @@ class DataTypeSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108433133
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -786,8 +786,8 @@ private[ui] object StagePage {
info: TaskInfo,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108432518
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagesTab.scala ---
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ private[ui] class StagesTab(parent: SparkUI) extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17417
I'm going to merge the two PRs with your comments applied (i.e. excluding
changes that are not necessarily doc-only). Thanks a lot for your time, Sean.
Appreciate a lot.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75310/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
**[Test build #75310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75310/testReport)**
for PR 17453 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
**[Test build #75312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75312/testReport)**
for PR 17208 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
Looks like the tests were manually killed (-9).
Thanks for catching that and fixing @liujianhuiouc
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17208
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dbolshak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108421849
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
def
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
btw I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20128 for the test
timeout -- fwiw I don't think its a problem w/ the test but a potential real
issue with the metrics system, though I don't
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458
There're many changes related to UI part, actually we don't have many unit
tests covered in this part, so I'm afraid these change may potentially
introduce regression.
---
If your project is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108420602
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
def
Github user MasterDDT commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Here is a sort example:
```
scala> val df1 = Seq((1, 2), (3, 4)).toDF("a", "b").sort("a")
df1: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = [a: int, b:
int]
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108418582
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
def
Github user MasterDDT commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
For example here is a similar bug for sorting:
>scala> Seq((1, 2), (3, 4)).toDF("a", "b").sort("a").selectExpr("a as
newA", "b").sort("newA")
res3:
Github user MasterDDT commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
Just curious, how come the fix is not in this code?
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108414149
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/SparkUI.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ private[spark] class SparkUI private (
with Logging
with
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108414360
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -513,8 +513,8 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
param
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108414748
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458#discussion_r108414675
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobsTab.scala ---
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ private[ui] class JobsTab(parent: SparkUI) extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user dbolshak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17458
[SPARK-20127][CORE] few warning have been fixed which Intellij IDEA
reported Intellij IDEA
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Few changes related to Intellij IDEA inspection.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75309/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
**[Test build #75309 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75309/testReport)**
for PR 17428 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
**[Test build #75311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75311/testReport)**
for PR 17457 at commit
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
[SPARK-20126][SQL] Remove HiveSessionState
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Commit
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ea361165e1ddce4d8aa0242ae3e878d7b39f1de2
moved
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17457
cc @cloud-fan @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452#discussion_r108407452
--- Diff: R/check-cran.sh ---
@@ -20,14 +20,14 @@
set -o pipefail
set -e
-FWDIR="$(cd `dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"`; pwd)"
-pushd
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75305/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
**[Test build #75305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75305/testReport)**
for PR 17453 at commit
Github user zuotingbing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452#discussion_r108400132
--- Diff: R/check-cran.sh ---
@@ -20,14 +20,14 @@
set -o pipefail
set -e
-FWDIR="$(cd `dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"`; pwd)"
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453
**[Test build #75310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75310/testReport)**
for PR 17453 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17456
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17456
@lnmohankumar please close this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user lnmohankumar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17456
Branch 2.1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75308/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17428
**[Test build #75308 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75308/testReport)**
for PR 17428 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453#discussion_r108392855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/PlanTest.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ abstract class PlanTest extends
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453#discussion_r108391785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/PlanTest.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ abstract class PlanTest extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17453#discussion_r108389791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/PlanTest.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ abstract class PlanTest extends
201 - 300 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
