Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
Ah right this is open vs 2.1. That much makes sense, disregard me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80352/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18820#discussion_r131731670
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -366,11 +370,15 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
**[Test build #80353 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80353/testReport)**
for PR 18421 at commit
[`2233b2c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80353/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r131732850
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -37,31 +37,19 @@ case class AnalyzeTableComman
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18421#discussion_r131733047
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18801
**[Test build #80351 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80351/testReport)**
for PR 18801 at commit
[`1ace5cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
GitHub user yoonlee95 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
[SPARK-21656][CORE] spark dynamic allocation should not idle timeout
executors when tasks still to run
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now spark lets go of exec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18801
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80351/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18801
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user goldmedal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875
[SPARK-21513][SQL] Allow UDF to_json support converting MapType to json
# What changes were proposed in this pull request?
UDF to_json only supports converting `StructType` or `ArrayType` of
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r131735748
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -547,35 +533,11 @@ object SummaryBuilderImpl extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18875
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18814
**[Test build #80354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80354/testReport)**
for PR 18814 at commit
[`3b3d822`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18814
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18814
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80354/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80361/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`d62154c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
**[Test build #80360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80360/testReport)**
for PR 18874 at commit
[`3c2cf90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18840
**[Test build #80356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80356/testReport)**
for PR 18840 at commit
[`578e26d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18840
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80356/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18840
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18840
Thanks! Merging to master and branch-2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
In my Windows10 environment, to leave temp result does not occur for
`"on-disk storage"`.
It happens for `"SPARK-20640: Shuffle registration timeout and maxAttempts
conf are working"`. I am lookin
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18840
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user dirkraft closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user dirkraft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18850
Closing out this noise for now. Discussions continue in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18838
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user adrian-ionescu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18876
WriteStatsTracker API
WIP
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/adrian-ionescu/apache-spark
write-stats-tracker-api
Alternati
Github user adrian-ionescu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18876
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
@wangjiaochun, let's close this if you are unable to explain why this
occurs in a certain environment. Looks hard to reproduce.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
@wangjiaochun, let's close this if you are unable to explain why this
happens in a certain environment. Looks hard to reproduce.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user dmvieira commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
removed other PR related code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18499
**[Test build #80355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80355/testReport)**
for PR 18499 at commit
[`70c93b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80355/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873#discussion_r131746369
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ def determine_modules_to_test(changed_modules):
if modules.root in modules_to_test:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
Is this a backport of another fix? If so you the PR title / summary should
reflect that.
If not, you need to open a bug and provide a better explanation in the PR
title / summary.
S
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
@vanzin, I remember [this
issue](http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Tests-failing-with-run-tests-py-SyntaxError-td22030.html)
was fixed roughly 5 days ago, which might be
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
Tests are already running on the PR, so we can see whether things still
fail.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r131749037
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -283,3 +333,201 @@ def numFeatures(self):
Returns the number of features the model was trained on.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r131749278
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -283,3 +333,201 @@ def numFeatures(self):
Returns the number of features the model was trained on.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18864
@dongjoon-hyun `paritionColumn` is wrong. It lacks a `t`. That is why the
existing assert is pretty confusing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849#discussion_r131750071
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -611,21 +640,39 @@ private[spark] class HiveExternalCatalog(conf
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18864
Thanks! Merging to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18864
Oh, I see. It's about typo. Thank you for fixing the error message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18864
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18692
**[Test build #80362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80362/testReport)**
for PR 18692 at commit
[`281f955`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/28
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869#discussion_r131754182
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -484,7 +501,20 @@ object Equality {
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18869
Could you check all of binary predicates you are trying to modify? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
**[Test build #80363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80363/testReport)**
for PR 18798 at commit
[`6053d0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/60
Github user radford1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18607
@viirya I have not had a chance to build out the docker tests like
@gatorsmile suggested. Will that be a requirement in order to merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
**[Test build #80357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80357/testReport)**
for PR 18802 at commit
[`7b419b4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80361/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`d62154c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80361/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80357/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80364/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`860132e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/86
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18851
Looks like the strip global limit is used by at least some test cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18820#discussion_r131756595
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1393,6 +1393,16 @@ def replace(self, to_replace, value=None,
subset=None):
|null| null|
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18607
@radford1 Yes. That is needed for merging this PR. Could you check it?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855#discussion_r131758308
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/DiskStore.scala ---
@@ -165,6 +147,62 @@ private[spark] class DiskStore(
}
+privat
Github user joseph-torres commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18790#discussion_r131761258
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +886,25 @@ object PushDownPredicate exten
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18790
**[Test build #80365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80365/testReport)**
for PR 18790 at commit
[`f0dd408`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
**[Test build #80359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80359/testReport)**
for PR 18798 at commit
[`4f32e27`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80359/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80366/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`2f216b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
**[Test build #80358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80358/testReport)**
for PR 18849 at commit
[`40ebc96`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80358/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18849
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14326#discussion_r131762320
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RobustRegression.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14326#discussion_r131764683
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RobustRegression.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,466 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14326#discussion_r131763824
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RobustRegression.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18861#discussion_r131766593
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -746,8 +746,20 @@ abstract class Re
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18861#discussion_r131766797
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2662,6 +2662,30 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
Merging to 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
@dmvieira please close the PR since github doesn't do it automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r131767248
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r131766119
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r131766525
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apa
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18873
@dmvieira the other PR passed tests, doesn't seem like this is necessary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18861#discussion_r131768761
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -596,14 +596,15 @@ object CollapseProject extends R
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
**[Test build #80360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80360/testReport)**
for PR 18874 at commit
[`3c2cf90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80364/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`860132e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80360/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18874
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80364/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818#discussion_r131771278
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -453,6 +453,14 @@ case class Or(left: Expression
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18764
Thanks, @yanboliang @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r131771002
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1158,6 +1165,33 @@ def test_decisiontree_regressor(self):
except OSError:
pas
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r131772274
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -61,33 +66,86 @@ def _randomUID(cls):
@inherit_doc
-class MLWriter(object):
+class B
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80366/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
[`2f216b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80366/
Test PASSed.
---
301 - 400 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
