Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19486
Ping @ash211
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ConeyLiu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19511#discussion_r145041400
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -890,32 +890,39 @@ class Analyzer(
/**
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19511
Hi, @cloud-fan @gatorsmile. Would you mind take a look?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19511
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480
@bdrillard thanks but we removed the "guilty" test case for many reasons.
Thank you anyway.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user aphasingnirvana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
@srowen So could I open another issue altogether?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19494
Merged to master/2.2
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19485
Less duplication is good but could we similar contents with
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sql-programming-guide.html#json-datasets?
It looks the examples are quite different.
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363
hi @cloud-fan jenkins ok
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19374#discussion_r145066047
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
**[Test build #82833 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82833/testReport)**
for PR 19476 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
**[Test build #82833 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82833/testReport)**
for PR 19476 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
**[Test build #82831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82831/testReport)**
for PR 19505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
**[Test build #82835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82835/testReport)**
for PR 19505 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19354
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
@ChenjunZou did you get a chance to look at my left comment?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r145039356
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -414,6 +415,43 @@ def _createFromLocal(self, data, schema):
data = [schema.toInternal(row)
GitHub user ConeyLiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19511
[SPARK-22293][SQL] Avoid unnecessary traversal in ResolveReferences
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We don't need traverse the children expression to determine whether
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82832/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82833/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #82832 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82832/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82831/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
Change itself LGTM if we are okay to go separating this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
**[Test build #82837 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82837/testReport)**
for PR 18747 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19263
@vanzin, do you have other comments?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19485#discussion_r145055873
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -462,7 +462,6 @@ names (`json`, `parquet`, `jdbc`, `orc`, `libsvm`,
`csv`, `text`). DataFrames lo
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19485
@gatorsmile WDYT?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664#discussion_r145037361
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/arrow/ArrowWriter.scala
---
@@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ object ArrowWriter {
case
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664#discussion_r145036404
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -1619,11 +1619,38 @@ def to_arrow_type(dt):
arrow_type = pa.decimal(dt.precision, dt.scale)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
**[Test build #82834 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82834/testReport)**
for PR 19476 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19509
>The effect of this change is that now it's possible to initialize multiple,
non-concurrent SparkContext instances in the same JVM.
@vanzin , do we support in now? As I remembered it
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
For the content type header, does the UI seem to work normally with it on?
I don't think we should have any problem with that restriction or else need to
fix it . You could move the defaults to on
Github user jomach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19485
Yes I'm viewing the docs with Jekyll. I addressed that on my previous
comment. I really don't think we should make a huge example as the json does.
It's a csv ...
What do you think ?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370#discussion_r145039851
--- Diff: bin/find-spark-home.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19354
merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #82836 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82836/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19494
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
No, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16599 is still open
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #82838 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82838/testReport)**
for PR 14151 at commit
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r145079551
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -17,10 +17,14 @@
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363
merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19512
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19514
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #82839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82839/testReport)**
for PR 14151 at commit
GitHub user FRosner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19514
[SPARK-21551][Python] Increase timeout for PythonRDD.serveIterator
Backport of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18752
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21551)
(cherry
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82838/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19513
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user pmackles opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19515
[SPARK-22287][MESOS] SPARK_DAEMON_MEMORY not honored by MesosClusterDâ¦
â¦ispatcher
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Allow JVM max heap size to be controlled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19515
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #82839 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82839/testReport)**
for PR 14151 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
**[Test build #82834 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82834/testReport)**
for PR 19476 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82837/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
**[Test build #82837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82837/testReport)**
for PR 18747 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r145079127
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -159,7 +160,8 @@
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19488
+1, before we figure out the semantic of nondeterministic aggregate
functions, let's be careful here.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82836/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
**[Test build #82835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82835/testReport)**
for PR 19505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82835/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #82836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82836/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269#discussion_r145096772
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/SimpleWritableDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19497
I guess one aspect of `saveAsNewAPIHadoopFile` is that it calls `
jobConfiguration.set("mapreduce.output.fileoutputformat.outputdir", path)`, and
`Configuration.set(String key, String value)`
GitHub user FRosner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19513
[SPARK-21551][Python] Increase timeout for PythonRDD.serveIterator
Backport of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18752
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21551)
(cherry
GitHub user FRosner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19512
[SPARK-21551][Python] Increase timeout for PythonRDD.serveIterator
Backport of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18752
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21551)
(cherry
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #82838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82838/testReport)**
for PR 14151 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19363
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82834/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ssaavedra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19469
I think that may be a good idea. I'd say this can depend on the scheduler.
Should that be discussed under a different JIRA number?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82839/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19513
**[Test build #3950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3950/testReport)**
for PR 19513 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19514
**[Test build #3949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3949/consoleFull)**
for PR 19514 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19512
**[Test build #3948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3948/testReport)**
for PR 19512 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19433
@smurching I found some issues and have some thoughts on the columnar
features format:
- In your doc, you said "Specifically, we only need to store sufficient
stats for each bin of a
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19517
[SPARK-20396][SQL][PySpark][FOLLOW-UP] groupby().apply() with pandas udf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up of #18732.
This pr modifies
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19516
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82840/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19517
**[Test build #82841 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82841/testReport)**
for PR 19517 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19517#discussion_r145149081
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2038,13 +2038,22 @@ def _wrap_function(sc, func, returnType):
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r145146799
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -23,21 +23,58 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19516
**[Test build #82840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82840/testReport)**
for PR 19516 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19516
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r145148278
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryRelation.scala
---
@@ -63,6 +64,23 @@ case class InMemoryRelation(
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19267
just reading through your description here all the yarn pieces aren't in
place so you have an admin type command to signal spark that a node is being
decommissioned. But that means someone has to
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19516
**[Test build #82840 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82840/testReport)**
for PR 19516 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r145137543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryRelation.scala
---
@@ -63,6 +64,23 @@ case class InMemoryRelation(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r145139806
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -23,21 +23,58 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r145139673
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -23,21 +23,58 @@ import
GitHub user mpjlu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19516
[SPARK-22277][ML]fix the bug of ChiSqSelector on preparing the output column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
To prepare the output columns when use ChiSqSelector, the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19505
**[Test build #82843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82843/testReport)**
for PR 19505 at commit
1 - 100 of 439 matches
Mail list logo
