AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641633573
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641633573
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437789267
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1167,6 +1172,17 @@ private[history] class
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16478:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16478#issuecomment-641647774
We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't
a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the
PR queue
SparkQA commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641614935
**[Test build #123709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123709/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641614950
**[Test build #123708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123708/testReport)**
for PR 28708 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641532764
**[Test build #123704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123704/testReport)**
for PR 28708 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641623473
**[Test build #123704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123704/testReport)**
for PR 28708 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28771#issuecomment-641625470
**[Test build #123703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123703/testReport)**
for PR 28771 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28771#issuecomment-641532792
**[Test build #123703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123703/testReport)**
for PR 28771 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641627813
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/28333/
SparkQA commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641635256
**[Test build #123709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123709/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437784544
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1197,6 +1213,78 @@ private[history] class
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437784544
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1197,6 +1213,78 @@ private[history] class
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641650249
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
srowen commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641650646
We can implement AutoCloseable instead (superinterface of Closeable) but I
don't think that by itself helps if there's some code path that leaks. It's a
bit of a band-aid but
agrawaldevesh commented on a change in pull request #27636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27636#discussion_r437795234
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DecommissionTracker.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,405 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
maropu opened a new pull request #28773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28773
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR intends to add `TYPE` in the ANSI non-reserved list because it is
not reserved in the standard. See SPARK-26905 for a full
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641650246
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641655790
In many spots in AppStatusStore, they call `view` but never explicitly call
`close`. The implementation is focused on being concise, not concerning about
the possible
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641662756
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641662475
**[Test build #123713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123713/testReport)**
for PR 28704 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641612877
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28593#issuecomment-641612468
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641612877
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641624125
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641624125
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #28773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28773#issuecomment-641651098
**[Test build #123711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123711/testReport)**
for PR 28773 at commit
jzhuge commented on pull request #28147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28147#issuecomment-641603964
@cloud-fan @dongjoon-hyun @brkyvz Could you comment on this WIP PR? Go or
no-go? Need more clarifications? Even though it is labeled as WIP, the code is
pretty stable and in
SparkQA commented on pull request #28593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28593#issuecomment-641611980
**[Test build #123701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123701/testReport)**
for PR 28593 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641622318
**[Test build #123710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123710/testReport)**
for PR 28733 at commit
zhli1142015 commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641626275
@squito , @srowen , @cloud-fan , could you please help review?
This is an automated message from the Apache
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28771#issuecomment-641625917
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28771#issuecomment-641625917
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641609954
**[Test build #123706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123706/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641633244
**[Test build #123706 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123706/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437784544
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1197,6 +1213,78 @@ private[history] class
zhli1142015 commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641658022
> In many spots in AppStatusStore, they call `view` but never explicitly
call `close`. The implementation is focused on being concise, not concerning
about the possible
gengliangwang commented on a change in pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#discussion_r437753240
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
##
@@ -198,6 +199,88 @@ trait PredicateHelper
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641610426
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641615414
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641615414
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641620349
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641620349
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641634288
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641634267
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/28333/
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641634288
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
zhli1142015 commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641652164
> I think this 'works', though I do wonder how many iterators are open at
once. It can't be like thousands, right?
>
> I guess we don't otherwise have a guess about
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656471
**[Test build #123712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123712/testReport)**
for PR 28704 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656994
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656985
**[Test build #123712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123712/testReport)**
for PR 28704 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641662756
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641663419
**[Test build #123705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123705/testReport)**
for PR 28733 at commit
baohe-zhang commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437811279
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1197,6 +1213,78 @@ private[history] class
huaxingao opened a new pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add instance weight support in LinearRegressionSummary
### Why are the changes needed?
LinearRegression and RegressionMetrics
SparkQA commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641612499
**[Test build #123707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123707/testReport)**
for PR 28733 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28593#issuecomment-641612459
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28593#issuecomment-641612459
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28593#issuecomment-641471490
**[Test build #123701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123701/testReport)**
for PR 28593 at commit
redsanket commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437780958
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStore.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
maropu commented on pull request #28764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28764#issuecomment-641636444
Could you review this? @HyukjinKwon @viirya @wangyum @yaooqinn
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437786292
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStore.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28773#issuecomment-641651407
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28773#issuecomment-641651407
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656999
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641610426
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641609954
**[Test build #123706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123706/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
gengliangwang commented on a change in pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#discussion_r437753240
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
##
@@ -198,6 +199,88 @@ trait PredicateHelper
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641635578
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641635578
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28772#issuecomment-641614935
**[Test build #123709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123709/testReport)**
for PR 28772 at commit
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28768#issuecomment-641644829
The change looks good - we may need to reflect the "actual change" into PR
title and description, as it's no longer same as initial proposal.
SparkQA commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641649996
**[Test build #123708 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123708/testReport)**
for PR 28708 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641650246
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28708#issuecomment-641614950
**[Test build #123708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123708/testReport)**
for PR 28708 at commit
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641649819
I guess the interface matters - in-memory KV store doesn't need to have
close in its iterator of course, but level DB KV store should. The code picked
"Iterator" as common
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641649819
I guess the interface matters - in-memory KV store doesn't need to have
close in its iterator of course (it has, but no-op), but level DB KV store
should. The code
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641664046
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
shaneknapp commented on pull request #28627:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28627#issuecomment-641652740
sorry, i don't watch github for @mentions... if this is still a problem,
file a build/infra jira and assign it to me. :)
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:00 PM Kousuke
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641652906
Oh I was pointing out innocent one. `KVStoreView` is the culprit, though the
class doc describes the warning.
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641652906
Oh I was pointing out innocent one. `KVStoreView` is the culprit, though the
class doc describes the warning.
SparkQA commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641656471
**[Test build #123712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123712/testReport)**
for PR 28704 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641549973
**[Test build #123705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/123705/testReport)**
for PR 28733 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28733#issuecomment-641664046
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
redsanket commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437780461
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala
##
@@ -1167,6 +1172,17 @@ private[history] class
srowen commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641636134
I think this 'works', though I do wonder how many iterators are open at
once. It can't be like thousands, right?
I guess we don't otherwise have a guess about what is
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437788564
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStore.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #28412:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28412#discussion_r437788564
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HybridStore.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641655003
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
zhli1142015 commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641655009
if we see description from below comments, i think even caller calls close,
it may still have leaking issue.
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641655003
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
srowen commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641655314
I'm not sure, I don't see any usages of it that don't close the iterator in
a finally block. I do wonder where these are allocated, if there is a
straightforward fix to the
viirya edited a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641655170
Added fold number check and test case both in Scala and Python.
This is an automated message from the
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641655007
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
viirya commented on pull request #28704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28704#issuecomment-641655170
Added fold number check both in Scala and Python.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641668567
IMHO, KVStoreView shouldn't implement Iterable directly - this leads callers
to simply call `iterator` or wrap with asScala and completely forget about the
resource close.
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #28769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28769#issuecomment-641668567
IMHO, KVStoreView shouldn't implement `Iterable` directly - this leads
callers to simply call `iterator` or wrap with `asScala` and completely forget
about the
HyukjinKwon commented on pull request #28745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28745#issuecomment-641674305
> will this cause perf regression? e.g. if grouping expr is expensive, with
the Project we only need to evaluate it once.
I would say this is kind of a design choice.
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28774#issuecomment-641674275
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
1 - 100 of 678 matches
Mail list logo