Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48433215
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48433227
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48433291
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16447/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48433290
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kanzhang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-48433560
@MLnick @mateiz @ahirreddy @pwendell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-48433563
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1338#issuecomment-48433564
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16446/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1210#issuecomment-48433693
I'm not sure is that what you want, so I hope you can review it and give me
come comments. Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#issuecomment-48433888
@miccagiann Thanks for adding Java examples! Please add
`[SPARK-1945][MLLIB]` to the title of this PR so that it is easier to find.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48434077
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48434083
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48434137
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48434138
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16448/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695146
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -809,12 +810,24 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#issuecomment-48434585
@miccagiann In Spark, we follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Spark+Code+Style+Guide
for Scala code style, while Java code should be similar. I'm
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695237
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695308
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.ui.jobs
import java.util.Date
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695401
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulators.scala ---
@@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] (
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695421
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1270,4 +1270,10 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
def toJavaRDD() :
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#issuecomment-48435300
Not sure if this is just because you took the screenshot early on, but I
noticed that the accumulator totals in the screenshot are not correct based on
the updates
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695474
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -758,6 +758,16 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695528
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulators.scala ---
@@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] (
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695572
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -809,12 +810,24 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695670
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -809,12 +810,24 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695696
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -42,6 +44,12 @@ class TaskInfo(
var gettingResultTime: Long = 0
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695912
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -147,6 +155,11 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14695974
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -217,6 +223,7 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: JobProgressTab)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14695968
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/ShuffleManager.scala
---
@@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ private[spark] trait ShuffleManager {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14695993
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleBlockManager.scala
---
@@ -59,8 +64,10 @@ private[spark] trait ShuffleWriterGroup {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696031
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleBlockManager.scala
---
@@ -59,8 +64,10 @@ private[spark] trait ShuffleWriterGroup {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696062
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleBlockManager.scala
---
@@ -156,17 +162,25 @@ class ShuffleBlockManager(blockManager:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696089
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleManager.scala ---
@@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.shuffle._
* A
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696085
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleManager.scala ---
@@ -49,12 +52,21 @@ class HashShuffleManager(conf: SparkConf) extends
Github user colorant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696083
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/ShuffleManager.scala
---
@@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ private[spark] trait ShuffleManager {
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14696093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -945,6 +958,8 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// Unrecognized
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696114
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/HashShuffleWriter.scala ---
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.executor.ShuffleWriteMetrics
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-48437004
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-48437014
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696189
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -72,23 +74,48 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Actual storage of
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696261
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -72,23 +74,48 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Actual storage of
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#issuecomment-48437261
This feature looks awesome!! Mostly cosmetic comments about how to make
this as understandable as possible to users.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696245
--- Diff: docs/mllib-clustering.md ---
@@ -69,7 +69,55 @@ println(Within Set Sum of Squared Errors = + WSSSE)
All of MLlib's methods use Java-friendly
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696246
--- Diff: docs/mllib-clustering.md ---
@@ -69,7 +69,55 @@ println(Within Set Sum of Squared Errors = + WSSSE)
All of MLlib's methods use Java-friendly
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696298
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -72,23 +74,48 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Actual storage of
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1309#discussion_r14696305
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -758,6 +758,16 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696311
--- Diff: docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md ---
@@ -99,7 +99,83 @@ val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank,
numIterations, alpha)
All of MLlib's
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696323
--- Diff: docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md ---
@@ -99,7 +99,83 @@ val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank,
numIterations, alpha)
All of MLlib's
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696372
--- Diff: docs/mllib-clustering.md ---
@@ -69,7 +69,55 @@ println(Within Set Sum of Squared Errors = + WSSSE)
All of MLlib's methods use Java-friendly
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696398
--- Diff: docs/mllib-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -151,10 +151,10 @@ L(\wv;\x,y) := \log(1+\exp( -y \wv^T \x)).
Logistic regression algorithm outputs a
Github user colorant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696400
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -72,23 +74,48 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Actual
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696416
--- Diff: docs/mllib-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -242,7 +242,98 @@ Similarly, you can use replace `SVMWithSGD` by
All of MLlib's methods use Java-friendly
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1311#discussion_r14696472
--- Diff: docs/mllib-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -338,7 +429,76 @@ and
[`LassoWithSGD`](api/scala/index.html#org.apache.spark.mllib.regression.Lass
All of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48437951
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48437961
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-48438019
@vrilleup Thanks for merging my changes and testing axpy performance! I
believe the overhead is a small map lookup in breeze's multimethod registry,
but I may be wrong.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/993#issuecomment-48438100
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16450/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user colorant commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1241#discussion_r14696621
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -72,23 +74,48 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Actual
Github user BaiGang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1270#issuecomment-48439552
@avulanov Thanks Alexander! I just started to implement the base learner.
The algorithms described in the MultiBoost document and the paper are
straightforward but it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-48439775
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16449/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-48439773
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1339
[SPARK-2415] [SQL] RowWriteSupport should handle empty ArrayType correctly.
`RowWriteSupport` doesn't write empty `ArrayType` value, so the read value
becomes `null`.
It should write empty
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1339#issuecomment-48441763
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1339#issuecomment-48441776
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444310
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444324
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444518
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444519
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16452/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444818
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444834
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444966
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16453/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48444965
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446141
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446153
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446337
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446338
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16454/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446630
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446645
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446829
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48446830
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16455/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1339#issuecomment-48450714
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48456959
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48456977
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48459362
@mengxr
I've addressed your comments. Added: FP rate and TP rate. Do you think I
should add confusion matrix as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48459596
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-48459590
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1008
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user pwendell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340
SPARK-2416: Allow richer reporting of unit test results
The built-in Jenkins integration is pretty bad. It's very confusing to
users whether tests have passed or failed and we can't easily
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460030
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460025
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460019
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460115
QA tests have started for PR 1340. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16458/consoleFull
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460408
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460414
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48460518
QA tests have started for PR 1340. This patch merges cleanly. brView
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16459/consoleFull
---
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1341
*-history-server.sh load spark-env.sh
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark history_env
Alternatively you can review and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1341#issuecomment-48462480
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1341#issuecomment-48462487
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user ScrapCodes opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1342
Added Sql to mima checks
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ScrapCodes/spark-1 sql-mima-checks
Alternatively you can review
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-48463486
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1340#issuecomment-48463488
QA results for PR 1340:br- This patch FAILED unit tests.br- This patch
merges cleanlybr- This patch adds the following public classes
(experimental):brclass PublicClass
1 - 100 of 368 matches
Mail list logo
