Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2956#issuecomment-66246533
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2956#issuecomment-66246526
[Test build #24239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24239/consoleFull)
for PR 2956 at commit
[`c73ee63`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3634
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3634#discussion_r21511496
--- Diff:
external/flume-sink/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/sink/SparkAvroCallbackHandler.scala
---
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ private[flume] class
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3634#issuecomment-66246264
Merging into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66244346
[Test build #24240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24240/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`396c0e1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66244351
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3641#issuecomment-66243872
[Test build #24241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24241/consoleFull)
for PR 3641 at commit
[`45cbfd0`](https://githu
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3641
[SPARK-4793] [Deploy] ensure .jar at end of line
sometimes I switch between different version and do not want to rebuild
spark, so I rename assembly.jar into .jar.bak, but still caught by
`comp
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66239947
[Test build #24240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24240/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`396c0e1`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2956#issuecomment-66239252
[Test build #24239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24239/consoleFull)
for PR 2956 at commit
[`c73ee63`](https://githu
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66238332
Any word on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66235605
[Test build #24236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24236/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
[`b09c309`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66235607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66234312
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66234309
[Test build #24238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24238/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`e9c3212`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66234140
[Test build #24235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24235/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
[`ab16bb5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66234144
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66233507
[Test build #24237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24237/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`19cbd46`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66233511
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66232292
[Test build #24238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24238/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`e9c3212`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640#issuecomment-66231529
[Test build #24237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24237/consoleFull)
for PR 3640 at commit
[`19cbd46`](https://githu
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3640
[SPARK-4785] [SQL] Support udf instance ser/de after initialization
UDF contract change in Hive 0.13.1. In Hive 0.12.0, it's always safe to
construct and initialize a fresh UDF object on work
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#issuecomment-66231241
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#issuecomment-66231235
[Test build #24234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24234/consoleFull)
for PR 3574 at commit
[`edb989d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66231049
[Test build #24236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24236/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
[`b09c309`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66229430
[Test build #24235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24235/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
[`ab16bb5`](https://githu
Github user jeffsteinmetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2872#issuecomment-66229322
The EC2 docs could also be updated to include these new switches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3602#issuecomment-66226961
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#issuecomment-66225436
[Test build #24234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24234/consoleFull)
for PR 3574 at commit
[`edb989d`](https://githu
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#issuecomment-66224947
@JoshRosen I refine the code according your comments.
If still have problem, it OK for you to fix up including the title and
comments, and thanks for you to check m
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3634#discussion_r21503445
--- Diff:
external/flume-sink/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/flume/sink/SparkAvroCallbackHandler.scala
---
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ private[flume] class
Github user CodEnFisH commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3421#issuecomment-66223296
Sure, we can close this PR first.
I will spare more time next week to work on #3515 and keep you posted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user CodEnFisH closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3421
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#issuecomment-66222053
Left a couple more comments. This is looking _much_ better than the code
that was there before; thanks for your patience with the really late review. I
have to run no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3336
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#discussion_r21502123
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +408,85 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#discussion_r21501964
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +408,85 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66220273
Alright, merging this into `master`. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#discussion_r21501514
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +408,85 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-66219789
QA results for PR 1269:- This patch FAILED unit tests.For more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/542/conso
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-66219684
O.K, I'll close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user sarutak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#discussion_r21501367
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +408,85 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2848#discussion_r21501389
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -412,6 +408,85 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66218996
[Test build #24233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24233/consoleFull)
for PR 3630 at commit
[`150e7e0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66219000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66214972
This LGTM, pending Jenkins. I just wanted to retest it to avoid a
build-break.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3624
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21499038
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21498969
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3624#issuecomment-66214551
I grepped through the code and this LGTM, too, so I'm going to merge this
into `master` and `branch-1.2`. Thanks @sryza!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66214045
Hey @WangTaoTheTonic I left a few comments. Also, could you document this?
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user kanzhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1082
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2661#issuecomment-66213955
Yeah, it looks like this has been subsumed by Andrew's changes in
723a86b04cfbc178fbd57bb78f4a2becc5cb1ef1, so do you mind closing this PR?
Thanks!
---
If your proje
Github user kanzhang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1082#issuecomment-66213985
OK, closing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r21498649
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +46,25 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3584#issuecomment-66213786
This looks good to me, although I wanted to note that we have some more
detailed IntelliJ instructions over at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Useful+
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r21498553
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +46,25 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r21498518
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +46,25 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3421#issuecomment-66213595
Do you mind closing this PR for now? I'd be happy to discuss more
DAGScheudler refactorings later, but it would be nice get this out of the
review queue for now unless
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3587#issuecomment-66213344
Merged to `branch-1.1`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3622#issuecomment-66213467
@JoshRosen One thing I was wondering about here that I couldn't figure out:
what does "private" actually mean in this context? I would have thought it
meant that i
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r21498374
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +46,25 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3587
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3587#issuecomment-66213074
LGTM, too. Merging into `master` and tagging for `branch-1.2` backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21498173
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66212933
[Test build #24233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24233/consoleFull)
for PR 3630 at commit
[`150e7e0`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3622#issuecomment-66212544
```
[error] * method GC_TIME()java.lang.String in object
org.apache.spark.ui.jobs.TaskDetailsClassNames does not have a correspondent in
new version
[error]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-66212417
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3630#issuecomment-66212396
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-66212407
[Test build #24232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24232/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
[`e3f9abe`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3635#issuecomment-66212364
Mind creating a JIRA for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21497595
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-66211199
QA tests have started for PR 1269. This patch DID NOT merge cleanly!
View progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/542/consoleFull
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-66210825
@akopich
The test failure seems unrelated (from a Python SQL test). I'll re-run the
tests.
(2) Regular and Robust in the same class
Would i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-66209979
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21496412
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3426#issuecomment-66208947
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3612#issuecomment-66209014
LGTM. I'm going to merge this into `master` and add a `backport-needed`
tag so we don't forget to merge this into `branch-1.2`.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1379#issuecomment-66208868
@avulanov Nice tests! A few comments:
* Computing accuracy: It would be good to test on the original MNIST test
set, rather than a subset of the training set. The
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21495884
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
Github user Lewuathe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#discussion_r21494740
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66204818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66204811
[Test build #24231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24231/consoleFull)
for PR 3633 at commit
[`f370a4e`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3624#issuecomment-66204351
@tgravescs It should be fine to pull docs-only changes into `branch-1.2`.
We're trying to hold off on merging code changes that aren't addressing 1.2.0
release blocker
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#discussion_r21493950
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala
---
@@ -54,8 +46,25 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user Lewuathe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#issuecomment-66203442
@jkbradley Thank you for reviewing. I'll update these points soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-66203211
The test failure reveals an issue in Spark SQL (ScalaReflection.scala:121
in schemaFor) where it gets confused if the case class includes multiple
constructors. The de
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-66202544
[Test build #24232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24232/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
[`e3f9abe`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-66201380
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3638#issuecomment-66201371
[Test build #24230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24230/consoleFull)
for PR 3638 at commit
[`94844d7`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#issuecomment-66199309
Left one minor code organization comment; aside from that, this looks good
to me and should be ready to merge after you fix that up (I can do it if you
don't have time,
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3574#discussion_r21491375
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -1010,7 +1010,10 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
info.sync
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3486#discussion_r21491005
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -183,6 +193,16 @@ trait SparkListener {
* Called when the driver re
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3486#discussion_r21490919
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -183,6 +193,16 @@ trait SparkListener {
* Called when the driver re
Github user orenmazor closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3639
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
