Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#discussion_r35480567
--- Diff: unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/ByteArray.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7559#issuecomment-124814662
@KaiXinXiaoLei I think there are still some issues with your code, mostly
that you're not explaining the change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#discussion_r35480542
--- Diff: unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/ByteArray.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124814035
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124814023
[Test build #38418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38418/console)
for PR 7658 at commit
[`2a56d7e`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7659#issuecomment-124813993
[Test build #38421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38421/consoleFull)
for PR 7659 at commit
[`7510447`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7659#issuecomment-124813956
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7659#issuecomment-124813953
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7659#issuecomment-124813910
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7659
[SPARK-9336][SQL] Remove extra JoinedRows
They were added to improve performance (so JIT can inline the JoinedRow
calls). However, we can also just improve it by projecting output out to
UnsafeRow in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124811599
[Test build #38420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38420/consoleFull)
for PR 7658 at commit
[`ed19e6c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124811007
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124810908
[Test build #97 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/97/console)
for PR 4229 at commit
[`a6747cb`](https://github.co
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124809557
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124809588
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124809221
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124809153
[Test build #38417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38417/console)
for PR 4229 at commit
[`a6747cb`](https://github.
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7597#issuecomment-124806728
I have merged this to branch 1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7606#issuecomment-124806164
[Test build #1200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1200/consoleFull)
for PR 7606 at commit
[`ad7f607`](https://git
Github user JDrit commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7606#issuecomment-124804691
@rixn, now with the python added, is there anything else that is needed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124804563
[Test build #38419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38419/consoleFull)
for PR 7650 at commit
[`0401bd1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803572
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803609
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803354
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803449
[Test build #98 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/98/consoleFull)
for PR 7650 at commit
[`0401bd1`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803389
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JDrit commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7478#issuecomment-124803186
@rxin, @marmbrus So with the added way to add new functions to the
`FunctionRegistry`, does this look good?
Having this will also allow functions such as `input__f
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124803033
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user JDrit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7606#discussion_r35480045
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -375,6 +375,14 @@ def sparkPartitionId():
sc = SparkContext._active_spark_context
return Colum
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479809
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124800231
@feynmanliang Thanks for helping review. Sent an update
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124798287
[Test build #38418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38418/consoleFull)
for PR 7658 at commit
[`2a56d7e`](https://gith
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479737
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#discussion_r35479724
--- Diff: unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/ByteArray.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124797668
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124797684
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#discussion_r35479711
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/UnsafeRowSerializerSuite.scala
---
@@ -22,29 +22,22 @@ import java.io.{ByteArrayInputStream,
B
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479705
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658
[SPARK-9334][SQL] Remove UnsafeRowConverter in favor of UnsafeProjection.
The two are redundant.
Once this patch is merged, I plan to remove the inbound conversions from
unsafe aggregates.
Y
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7658#issuecomment-124797268
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479695
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479613
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124796143
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124796141
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124796147
[Test build #97 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/97/consoleFull)
for PR 4229 at commit
[`a6747cb`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124795663
[Test build #38417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38417/consoleFull)
for PR 4229 at commit
[`a6747cb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124795348
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124795334
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user prabeesh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-124795267
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user massie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124795158
Still failing with...
```
[info] KinesisBackedBlockRDDSuite:
[info] Exception encountered when attempting to run a suite with class
name: org.apache.spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124794698
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124794500
[Test build #38415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38415/console)
for PR 7388 at commit
[`589e93d`](https://github.
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479531
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35479315
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124792889
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124792884
[Test build #38414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38414/console)
for PR 7403 at commit
[`59abe01`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6955#issuecomment-124792224
[Test build #38416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38416/console)
for PR 6955 at commit
[`b810127`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6955#issuecomment-124792225
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6955#issuecomment-124791928
[Test build #38416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38416/consoleFull)
for PR 6955 at commit
[`b810127`](https://gith
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7609#issuecomment-124791909
@mengxr Sorry for the surprise. The code was actually written based on a
customer requirement and I just shared it hoping it will help.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6955#issuecomment-124791814
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6955#issuecomment-124791817
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124790836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124790818
**[Test build #38409 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38409/console)**
for PR 7650 at commit
[`0401bd1`](https://github
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35478785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -573,4 +573,109 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
dayIn
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124790013
[Test build #38415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38415/consoleFull)
for PR 7388 at commit
[`589e93d`](https://gith
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656#issuecomment-124789906
Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656#issuecomment-124789712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124789688
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7388#issuecomment-124789683
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656#issuecomment-124789694
[Test build #38413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38413/console)
for PR 7656 at commit
[`5ba0e90`](https://github.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7654
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7654#issuecomment-124789484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7654#issuecomment-124789466
[Test build #38412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38412/console)
for PR 7654 at commit
[`b491a09`](https://github.
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7014#discussion_r35478432
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -97,13 +103,27 @@ case class ExceptionFailure(
description: String,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-124787659
[Test build #38408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38408/console)
for PR 5423 at commit
[`44a0d4f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-124787740
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yjshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7589#discussion_r35478407
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeFunctions.scala
---
@@ -258,3 +305,125 @@ case class DateFormatClass(l
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124785284
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124785269
[Test build #96 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/96/console)
for PR 7650 at commit
[`0401bd1`](https://github.co
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7657#issuecomment-124784178
Jenkins, this is ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124782551
[Test build #38414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38414/consoleFull)
for PR 7403 at commit
[`59abe01`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124781626
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7657#issuecomment-124781617
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124781618
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7657#issuecomment-124781566
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user massie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124781545
The error isn't related to this PR...
```
[info] *** 1 SUITE ABORTED ***
[error] Error: Total 21, Failed 0, Errors 1, Passed 20
[error] Error during te
Github user massie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124781553
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user neurons opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7657
[SPARK-9092] Fixed incompatibility when both num-executors and dynamic...
⦠allocation are set. Now, dynamic allocation is set to false when
num-executors is explicitly specified as an argument. C
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7652#issuecomment-124780680
@badriub I just added some thoughts on the JIRA. Could you please take a
look and respond there? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7559#issuecomment-124780545
I think my change code is not the reason of this failed test , And in my
machine, this test passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124780496
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7650#issuecomment-124780487
[Test build #38407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38407/console)
for PR 7650 at commit
[`0401bd1`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656#issuecomment-124780442
[Test build #38413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38413/consoleFull)
for PR 7656 at commit
[`5ba0e90`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124780285
[Test build #38406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/38406/console)
for PR 7403 at commit
[`59abe01`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#issuecomment-124780294
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7656#issuecomment-124780227
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
1 - 100 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
