Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10322#issuecomment-165221194
LGTM, so I'm going to merge this into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#issuecomment-165221379
**[Test build #47844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47844/consoleFull)**
for PR 10268 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165224554
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#discussion_r47823645
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/CheckpointSuite.scala ---
@@ -715,6 +736,35 @@ class CheckpointSuite extends TestSuiteBase with
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#discussion_r47823739
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/CheckpointSuite.scala ---
@@ -715,6 +736,35 @@ class CheckpointSuite extends TestSuiteBase with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10208#issuecomment-165226014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165226009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113#issuecomment-165225983
**[Test build #47849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47849/consoleFull)**
for PR 9113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165226005
**[Test build #47845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47845/consoleFull)**
for PR 10329 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165225775
@skyluc looks like there is a style violation with this patch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165227460
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10235#issuecomment-165227363
OK thanks!
Merging with master and branch-1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165227299
**[Test build #47830 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47830/consoleFull)**
for PR 10332 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113#issuecomment-165231454
**[Test build #47849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47849/consoleFull)**
for PR 9113 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113#issuecomment-165231601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165233024
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165238477
Sure, will do It! Thank you for your guidance!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-165241236
**[Test build #47838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47838/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10301#issuecomment-165244297
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10301#issuecomment-165244293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10337#issuecomment-165246287
**[Test build #47854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47854/consoleFull)**
for PR 10337 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#issuecomment-165220595
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165223713
**[Test build #2221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2221/consoleFull)**
for PR 10329 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9888#issuecomment-165225716
**[Test build #47848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47848/consoleFull)**
for PR 9888 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9888#issuecomment-165225719
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165222829
**[Test build #47845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47845/consoleFull)**
for PR 10329 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9888#issuecomment-165225722
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10334#issuecomment-165226512
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165230905
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165232112
**[Test build #47852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47852/consoleFull)**
for PR 10335 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47829608
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +127,69 @@ case class Sample(
}
}
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47830240
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10301#issuecomment-165244012
**[Test build #47834 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47834/consoleFull)**
for PR 10301 at commit
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10337
[SPARK-12350] [core] Don't log errors when requested stream is not found.
If a client requests a non-existent stream, just send a failure message
back, without logging any error on the server
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47834244
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10334#issuecomment-165247391
**[Test build #47842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47842/consoleFull)**
for PR 10334 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10311#issuecomment-165175811
**[Test build #47819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47819/consoleFull)**
for PR 10311 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8885#issuecomment-165184442
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165194859
**[Test build #47830 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47830/consoleFull)**
for PR 10332 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165202252
I will go ahead and do a quick test on standalone cluster mode with this
fix and report back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165202088
This seems like a better place to filter it out. My only concern is that
this one also affects standalone cluster mode, whereas #10332 is totally a
Mesos thing.
Github user skyluc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165204770
Code LGTM. Unfortunately, I cannot try it before a couple of hours.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165204839
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10290#issuecomment-165204897
LGTM. Merging into master (and not `branch-1.6` as we probably don't want
to change the API in a minor release like 1.6.1).
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165210134
LGTM merging into master and 1.6. Just FYI I might revert this patch in
master because I believe #10329 is a better fix in the long run, but for now
let's just
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#discussion_r47816823
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/mesos/MesosRestServer.scala ---
@@ -94,7 +94,12 @@ private[mesos] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10311#issuecomment-165209891
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10320#issuecomment-165209976
I compared JDBCRDD.scala with JdbcRDD.scala
From what I can tell according to the usage of java.sql.Connection and
java.sql.ResultSet, the proposed change is needed
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9952#issuecomment-165210239
LGTM, merging with master and branch-1.6
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#issuecomment-165221624
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10268#issuecomment-165221626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10277#issuecomment-165221559
**[Test build #47827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47827/consoleFull)**
for PR 10277 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10326#issuecomment-165224832
ok to test (@dragos you can also say this by the way)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#issuecomment-165224917
Just two nits. Otherwise LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10325#issuecomment-165229350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10325#issuecomment-165229169
**[Test build #47831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47831/consoleFull)**
for PR 10325 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165232552
**[Test build # has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder//consoleFull)**
for PR 10333 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165232881
**[Test build #47835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47835/consoleFull)**
for PR 10333 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165233027
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-165233108
ping @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47828090
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +127,69 @@ case class Sample(
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10180#issuecomment-165233273
**[Test build #47839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47839/consoleFull)**
for PR 10180 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47828506
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10180#issuecomment-165240392
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165230907
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47827840
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +127,69 @@ case class Sample(
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10180#issuecomment-165233362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user evanyc15 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10336
[SPARK-12376][TESTS] Spark Streaming Java8APISuite fails in
assertOrderInvariantEquals method
org.apache.spark.streaming.Java8APISuite.java is failing due to trying to
sort immutable list in
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47829468
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165236262
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165236260
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10336#issuecomment-165236230
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165236228
**[Test build #47852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47852/consoleFull)**
for PR 10335 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#issuecomment-165238312
The high level structure of this look pretty good to me. Could you also
post some numbers from a micro benchmark? It would be good to make sure we're
actually
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10324#issuecomment-165242279
LGTM, and it worked when I tested it locally.
I'll go ahead and merge it with master and branch-1.6.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9888#issuecomment-165222363
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10208#issuecomment-165222160
Okey. I just removed my last 2 commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10208#issuecomment-16557
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9888#issuecomment-165225457
**[Test build #47848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47848/consoleFull)**
for PR 9888 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9113#issuecomment-165224194
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10208#issuecomment-165227079
**[Test build #47847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47847/consoleFull)**
for PR 10208 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10326#issuecomment-165229364
Don't have anything else to add besides what @dragos said, but seems like
it takes a while to get this updated. I vote for trying to merge this first as
this adds more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10325#issuecomment-165229352
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#issuecomment-165220327
**[Test build #47832 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47832/consoleFull)**
for PR 9765 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9765#issuecomment-165220591
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165224558
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10333#issuecomment-165224493
**[Test build #47843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47843/consoleFull)**
for PR 10333 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10208#issuecomment-165226020
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10329#issuecomment-165226015
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10326#issuecomment-165226384
**[Test build #47850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47850/consoleFull)**
for PR 10326 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10332#issuecomment-165227464
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335
[Spark-12374][SPARK-12150][SQL] Adding logical/physical operators for Range
Based on the suggestions from @marmbrus , added logical/physical operators
for Range for improving the performance.
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47830128
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10335#discussion_r47830108
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +210,37 @@ case class Sort(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10334#issuecomment-165247573
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10334#issuecomment-165247566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9553#issuecomment-165249868
The use case here is that I want to build one common spark that is used
across many different clusters. Those clusters may not have Hive running yet,
or perhaps I
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10293#issuecomment-165249935
Okay, I'm going to merge this into master while removing the unnecessary
deletion. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user ygcao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r47822243
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -281,17 +295,28 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
1 - 100 of 806 matches
Mail list logo
