Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#discussion_r48332590
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +48,34 @@ trait Predicate extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166850088
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166850081
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166850935
**[Test build #48236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48236/consoleFull)**
for PR 10444 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166852843
cc @nongli @rxin @marmbrus @yjshen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8200#discussion_r48333880
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -464,6 +465,24 @@ object OptimizeIn extends
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#issuecomment-166854056
@tribbloid let's wrap this up at last. Can you please review all the
outstanding comments and address them or else close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10442#issuecomment-166853471
Why does this need to be added?
The Guava exceptions are going away in 2.x anyway.
This also doesn't follow
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10442#discussion_r48333932
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -99,14 +99,14 @@
sql/hive
unsafe
assembly
-external/twitter
-external/flume
-
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334101
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -107,7 +135,7 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
isPublic: Boolean =
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334129
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334144
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334160
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334198
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#discussion_r48334213
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +101,33 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
}
},
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10314#issuecomment-166855061
Are there other configs that should take a memory string?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#issuecomment-166856069
**[Test build #2251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2251/consoleFull)**
for PR 10289 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166867696
**[Test build #48236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48236/consoleFull)**
for PR 10444 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166868044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166868043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10445
[SPARK-12498][SQL][MINOR] BooleanSimplication simplification
Scala syntax and existing Catalyst expression DSL allows us to refactor the
`BooleanSimplification` optimization rule to a clearer
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166869105
**[Test build #48232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48232/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166869266
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166869262
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10445#issuecomment-166870629
**[Test build #48237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48237/consoleFull)**
for PR 10445 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166870843
**[Test build #48238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48238/consoleFull)**
for PR 10444 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10289#issuecomment-166878686
**[Test build #2251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2251/consoleFull)**
for PR 10289 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166879266
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#discussion_r48346325
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ case class NewInstance(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166924872
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166924875
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user abridgett opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448
[SPARK-12499] [build] don't force MAVEN_OPTS
allow the user to override MAVEN_OPTS (2GB wasn't sufficient for me)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#discussion_r48344118
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ case class NewInstance(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166916883
**[Test build #48242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48242/consoleFull)**
for PR 10443 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10310#issuecomment-166918642
@QiangCai thanks that looks good, but this needs a rebase now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166923370
**[Test build #48243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48243/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449
[SPARK-12500] [CORE] Fix Tachyon deprecations; pull Tachyon dependency into
one class
Fix Tachyon deprecations; pull Tachyon dependency into
`TachyonBlockManager` only
CC @calvinjia as I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166899721
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166899666
**[Test build #48239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48239/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166899720
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-166901054
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-166901014
**[Test build #48241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48241/consoleFull)**
for PR 10435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10445#issuecomment-166891869
**[Test build #48237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48237/consoleFull)**
for PR 10445 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166891798
**[Test build #48238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48238/consoleFull)**
for PR 10444 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166896497
**[Test build #48242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48242/consoleFull)**
for PR 10443 at commit
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10310#issuecomment-166912120
@srowen I have modified all the code, and try to keep them to be the same.
At first, the var numPartsToTry and partsScanned have been set to Long.
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166925236
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448#issuecomment-166931510
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10445#issuecomment-166891943
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166891882
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10445#issuecomment-166891946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10444#issuecomment-166891883
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#discussion_r48346034
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ case class NewInstance(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#discussion_r48350913
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ case class NewInstance(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10384#discussion_r48355484
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -23,15 +23,23 @@ import org.apache.spark.Logging
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449#issuecomment-166934193
**[Test build #48247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48247/consoleFull)**
for PR 10449 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10435#issuecomment-166901052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166917017
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10443#issuecomment-166917016
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166926556
**[Test build #48245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48245/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166928166
**[Test build #48246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48246/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166948106
**[Test build #48246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48246/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48363721
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364543
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10449#issuecomment-166957539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48367142
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -69,36 +83,53 @@ follows:
+### Spark configuration options
+
Property
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48368082
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -69,36 +83,53 @@ follows:
+### Spark configuration options
+
Property
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10450#issuecomment-166950936
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364727
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364720
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166960152
**[Test build #2253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2253/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-166963932
**[Test build #48248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48248/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10438#issuecomment-166969653
Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10447#issuecomment-166969718
**[Test build #48249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48249/consoleFull)**
for PR 10447 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372722
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializerSuite.scala ---
@@ -154,6 +155,19 @@ class KryoSerializerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166947653
**[Test build #48243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48243/consoleFull)**
for PR 10446 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166947721
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10446#issuecomment-166947723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364439
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -430,8 +517,55 @@ private[history] class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364502
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48366527
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -21,15 +21,28 @@ import java.net.{HttpURLConnection, URL}
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48366891
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +296,191 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10447#issuecomment-166967310
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10447#issuecomment-166970244
Changes LGTM. I'll merge this once tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48371027
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48363399
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48364066
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -430,8 +517,55 @@ private[history] class
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10374#issuecomment-166949939
I would prefer to change the implementation of toSeq.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48366085
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r48366097
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCacheSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10448#issuecomment-166958625
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48370672
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +215,19 @@ class TaskMetrics extends Serializable {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-166970399
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
var
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166946807
**[Test build #48245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48245/consoleFull)**
for PR 10391 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166946901
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166948261
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10391#issuecomment-166948262
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yzhou2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10450#issuecomment-166974291
This change is actually very close to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9548. Sorry I did not look at the code
changes carefully there, except for the detailed
Github user yzhou2001 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10450
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
