Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470346
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470296
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -60,6 +62,12 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169233
**[Test build #50493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50493/consoleFull)**
for PR 11004 at commit
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178179456
Can you include the generated code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51481347
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamProgress.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006
[SPARK-10820][SQL] Support for the continuous execution of structured
queries
This is a follow up to 9aadcffabd226557174f3ff566927f873c71672e that
extends Spark SQL to allow users to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178133344
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-178139026
jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51480080
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamProgress.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178188600
**[Test build #2486 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2486/consoleFull)**
for PR 10989 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#discussion_r51481128
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterSchedulerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51482277
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -180,6 +221,46 @@ case class Join(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51483011
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user huaxingao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11005
[SPARK-12506][SPARK-12126][SQL]use CatalystScan for JDBCRelation
As suggested
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#issuecomment-178132065
I did not merge this into 1.6 or before because of 2 reasons:
- It doesn't merge cleanly, and more importantly
- This changes internal semantics and it's not
Github user iyounus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10702#issuecomment-178134675
For the case (3), I'm assuming that the label and features are not
standardized. So, in that case, the solution exists. Here is my perspective on
this.
The
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-178139377
Thanks, merging to master and 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178146931
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470974
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51470918
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#discussion_r51472337
--- Diff:
core/src/test/resources/spark-events/local-1425081759268/EVENT_LOG_1 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+{"Event":"SparkListenerBlockManagerAdded","Block
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178166829
sure - that was just to make sure it doesn't get picked up, as a negative
test. I can purge all of that since it seems both you and @vanzin have the same
feedback?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178166922
**[Test build #50494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50494/consoleFull)**
for PR 10998 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51476814
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51476822
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51476807
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51480355
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamProgress.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178189170
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178189155
**[Test build #50500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50500/consoleFull)**
for PR 10949 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10995#issuecomment-178197729
Since Hadoop doesn't shade `protobuf`, I think this won't fix the issue in
the PR description. Right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51482050
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -89,9 +89,27 @@ case class Generate(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51482081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -180,6 +221,46 @@ case class Join(
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10921#issuecomment-178204415
LGTM merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178128143
**[Test build #50494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50494/consoleFull)**
for PR 10998 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178141964
@zsxwing Other than the PR title - I think everything else says inflight in
code/documentation. Did you see anything to the contrary ?
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178143411
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178143406
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-178151143
Looks like this is failing real tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#issuecomment-178161088
LGTM, thanks for adding a bunch of tests!
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51471308
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -364,7 +379,27 @@ private[spark] class
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10915#issuecomment-178167383
Thanks, merged to branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178167285
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178167283
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178169324
Can you include the generated code?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178169396
I see, that seems unnecessary. We deleted all the code path that would
parse the format so it's pretty much impossible for it to be picked up right?
---
If your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10991#issuecomment-178169443
cc @andrewor14, @squito for thoughts on above
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11004#issuecomment-178169642
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10996#issuecomment-178169426
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-178173549
Also, follow-up question: have you tested this with cluster mode and/or
with dynamic allocation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178178205
By the way, I'd just like to point out that there is another patch that
fixes the same issue #10768. @tnachen @dragos what's the difference and which
one should we
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10768#issuecomment-178178342
FYI #10949 is another patch for the same issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10921
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#discussion_r51462281
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedRleValuesReader.java
---
@@ -180,6 +188,152 @@ public void
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#discussion_r51462376
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedPlainValuesReader.java
---
@@ -52,15 +55,49 @@ public void
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178129985
@tgravescs in general, this patch doesn't limit number of concurrent
outbound connections. Instead, it just limits number of in flight blocks. Could
you update the
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178144361
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10431#issuecomment-178158109
Yeah, since its labeled experimental, I'd like to fix as many Dataset bugs
as we can for 1.6.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#discussion_r51477107
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/BufferedRowIterator.java
---
@@ -54,13 +54,27 @@ public void setInput(Iterator iter) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178189166
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178191589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#discussion_r51481006
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -525,14 +531,14 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178191582
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51482488
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/ConstraintPropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#discussion_r51463360
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/CheckpointSuite.scala ---
@@ -821,6 +821,75 @@ class CheckpointSuite extends TestSuiteBase
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10934#issuecomment-178130645
Merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178133351
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178151805
**[Test build #50498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50498/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10901#issuecomment-178163321
Merging to master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#issuecomment-178159771
Could we merge this please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10901
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10915#issuecomment-178172474
Can you close this PR now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178177036
Also cc @tnachen who wrote this code originally. From the JIRA:
> CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend have constraints feature but dispacher deploy
use
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#discussion_r51480776
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -497,28 +505,28 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11007#issuecomment-178190454
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11005#issuecomment-178126949
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-178142661
hi @steveloughran sorry for another really long delay on my end. mostly
this looks fine, there are some style nits and a couple of comments that need
updating. I also
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178146926
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-178153656
Hm, I think `block` is also not `accurate`. Never mind, just update the
title should be enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11002#issuecomment-178160294
This change looks good to me, maybe @JoshRosen who was the last to touch
that line can take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#issuecomment-178168455
**[Test build #50499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50499/consoleFull)**
for PR 10908 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178174598
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#issuecomment-178179904
**[Test build #50499 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50499/consoleFull)**
for PR 10908 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#discussion_r51480535
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -456,34 +460,36 @@ private[spark] class
GitHub user gabrielenizzoli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11007
java mapwithstate, broken java mapping
java mapwithstate with Function3 has wrong conversion of java Optional to
scala Option, now code uses same conversion used in the mapwithstate call
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178147379
**[Test build #2486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2486/consoleFull)**
for PR 10989 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10860#discussion_r51472679
--- Diff: .rat-excludes ---
@@ -63,14 +63,15 @@ logs
.*dependency-reduced-pom.xml
known_translations
json_expectation
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51476990
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#discussion_r51478445
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -180,6 +221,46 @@ case class Join(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-178181958
**[Test build #50500 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50500/consoleFull)**
for PR 10949 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51478334
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178190775
**[Test build #50498 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50498/consoleFull)**
for PR 11006 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-178195492
@tnachen echoing my comment from another PR: it seems that this feature is
already supported in client mode but not in cluster mode. Is there something we
can do
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51483601
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StreamTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10995#issuecomment-178202908
This would still benefit Spark standalone and Spark on Mesos, right ?
For Spark on YARN, status quo is maintained.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#issuecomment-178205092
Looks great! Just some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
1 - 100 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
