Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
**[Test build #59984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59984/consoleFull)**
for PR 13508 at commit
Github user zhonghaihua commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12258#discussion_r65797802
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -343,17 +343,31 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Can you try to write a design doc on this? Would be great to discuss the
reasons why we might want this, the kind of queries that can be answered,
corner cases, and how it should be implemented.
Github user zhonghaihua commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12258#discussion_r6579
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -343,17 +343,31 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user zhonghaihua commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12258#discussion_r65797773
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -343,17 +343,31 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
**[Test build #59984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59984/consoleFull)**
for PR 13508 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
hm probably shouldn't happen in this pr but i'm wondering if it'd make
sense to generalize AttributeSeq and use it everywhere, rather than
Seq[Attribute].
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65797603
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
/**
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13508
[SPARK-15766][SparkR]:R should export is.nan
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reviewing SPARK-15545, we found that is.nan is not exported, which
should be
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
LGTM other than that small comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504#discussion_r65797565
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Metadata.scala ---
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ sealed class Metadata private[types] (private[types]
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13506#discussion_r65797550
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1441,6 +1441,32 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13507
**[Test build #59983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59983/consoleFull)**
for PR 13507 at commit
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13507
[SPARK-15765][SQL][Streaming] Make continuous Parquet writing consistent
with non-consistent Parquet writing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently there are some
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13442
@rxin plz check this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13442
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59982/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13442
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13442
**[Test build #59982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59982/consoleFull)**
for PR 13442 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r65796528
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -88,14 +106,6 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r65796510
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -58,15 +59,32 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13413#discussion_r65796505
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -1481,17 +1481,7 @@ def test_list_functions(self):
spark.sql("CREATE DATABASE some_db")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59981/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59981 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59981/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13461
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59979/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403
**[Test build #59979 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59979/consoleFull)**
for PR 13403 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13442
**[Test build #59982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59982/consoleFull)**
for PR 13442 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13444
@yhuai ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59977/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
**[Test build #59977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59977/consoleFull)**
for PR 13486 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12173
@falaki ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59978/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
**[Test build #59978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59978/consoleFull)**
for PR 13436 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59976/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59976/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Here's a flame graph of bindReferences dominating the CPU used for a 10k
column query:
[profile](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/298644/slow-bind-refs.svg.zip)
---
If your project is
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
[hash code
profile](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/298642/hashcode.svg.zip)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59980/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59980 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59980/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
@rxin I have updated PR description. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
@rxin, @ericl has some new benchmarks which operate on even wider schemas
and which uncovered this bottleneck. Adding the caching of the map here
resulted in a huge scalability improvement. Maybe
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
@rxin, I don't have the specific performance numbers handy but in an
optimizer stress-test benchmark run by @ericl, these hashCode calls accounted
for roughly 40% of the total CPU time and this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59974/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13407
Thanks @vanzin for review and merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59974/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59981/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65795007
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65794996
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/package.scala
---
@@ -86,11 +86,31 @@ package object expressions {
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248
@praveendareddy21 Just made a first pass. Also please run PEP8 on your code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794904
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794836
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794779
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59970/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59972/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13503
**[Test build #59970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59970/consoleFull)**
for PR 13503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
**[Test build #59972 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59972/consoleFull)**
for PR 13061 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794427
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65794395
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794325
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794293
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59971/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13504
**[Test build #59971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59971/consoleFull)**
for PR 13504 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794126
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59973/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13472
**[Test build #59973 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59973/consoleFull)**
for PR 13472 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59980 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59980/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65794056
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65793951
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13506
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user kevinyu98 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13506
[SPARK-15763][SQL] Support DELETE FILE command natively
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Hive supports these cli commands to manage the resource [Hive
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13248#discussion_r65793865
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/stat/distribution.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59976/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13403
**[Test build #59979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59979/consoleFull)**
for PR 13403 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
**[Test build #59978 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59978/consoleFull)**
for PR 13436 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
**[Test build #59977 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59977/consoleFull)**
for PR 13486 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65793015
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -84,17 +84,27 @@ object BindReferences
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12938#discussion_r65792982
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -183,7 +191,7 @@ def getThresholds(self):
If :py:attr:`thresholds` is set, return its value.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59975/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59975/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65792855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -84,17 +84,27 @@ object BindReferences
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
**[Test build #59975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59975/consoleFull)**
for PR 13505 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505#discussion_r65792692
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/BoundAttribute.scala
---
@@ -84,17 +84,27 @@ object BindReferences
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13505
[SPARK-15764][SQL] Replace N^2 loop in BindReferences
BindReferences contains a n^2 loop which causes performance issues when
operating over large schemas: to determine the ordinal of an
1 - 100 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
