Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13447
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13447
Thanks. LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67463353
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -276,7 +267,42 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Hi, @shivaram . The followings are updated and become ready for review
again.
- The param description is improved.
- The size and ratio of returned list is compared with those of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60680/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
Hi, @tdas .
This is the PR to care the reported corner case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13728
**[Test build #60680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60680/consoleFull)**
for PR 13728 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730#discussion_r67462488
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -339,6 +339,9 @@ private[sql] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
**[Test build #60686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60686/consoleFull)**
for PR 13730 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13730
[SPARK-16006][SQL] Attemping to write empty DataFrame with no fields throws
non-intuitive exception
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the error
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60679/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
**[Test build #60679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60679/consoleFull)**
for PR 13727 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13717
**[Test build #60685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60685/consoleFull)**
for PR 13717 at commit
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
LGTM,
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13722#discussion_r67462006
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ setMethod("createOrReplaceTempView",
invisible(callJMethod(x@sdf,
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13652
@JoshRosen How does this look now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60684/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
**[Test build #60684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60684/consoleFull)**
for PR 13721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60682/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
**[Test build #60682 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60682/consoleFull)**
for PR 13721 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67460691
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -276,7 +267,42 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460632
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460610
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460540
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60681/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
**[Test build #60681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60681/consoleFull)**
for PR 13729 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
**[Test build #60684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60684/consoleFull)**
for PR 13721 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460480
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
lgtm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460323
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460344
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460294
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/macros.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
**[Test build #60683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60683/consoleFull)**
for PR 13727 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460169
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ statement
| CREATE TEMPORARY?
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460139
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -590,6 +591,38 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r67460021
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ statement
| CREATE TEMPORARY?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721
**[Test build #60682 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60682/consoleFull)**
for PR 13721 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
@hvanhovell okay, I'll finish the fix soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
@liancheng I've updated the benchmark. Please take a look. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60677/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
**[Test build #60677 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60677/consoleFull)**
for PR 13720 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
**[Test build #60681 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60681/consoleFull)**
for PR 13729 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
cc @jkbradley @dbtsai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13729
[SPARK-16008] Remove unnecessary serialization in logistic regression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`LogisticAggregator` stores references to two arrays of dimension
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13728
**[Test build #60680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60680/consoleFull)**
for PR 13728 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13722
LGTM. I just had a couple of points about the docs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13728
[SPARK-16010] [SQL] Code Refactoring, Test Case Improvement and Description
Updates for SQLConf spark.sql.parquet.filterPushdown
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457739
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2264,6 +2264,14 @@ test_that("createDataFrame sqlContext parameter
backward
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
**[Test build #60679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60679/consoleFull)**
for PR 13727 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457591
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2264,6 +2264,14 @@ test_that("createDataFrame sqlContext parameter
backward
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457577
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2884,3 +2884,39 @@ setMethod("write.jdbc",
write <- callJMethod(write, "mode", jmode)
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457504
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2264,6 +2264,14 @@ test_that("createDataFrame sqlContext parameter
backward compatibility", {
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457476
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2264,6 +2264,14 @@ test_that("createDataFrame sqlContext parameter
backward compatibility", {
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13721#discussion_r67457426
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2884,3 +2884,39 @@ setMethod("write.jdbc",
write <- callJMethod(write, "mode", jmode)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60678/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67457343
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -276,7 +267,42 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67457308
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -146,18 +140,15 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13722#discussion_r67457292
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ setMethod("createOrReplaceTempView",
invisible(callJMethod(x@sdf,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
Thank you, @shivaram !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727#discussion_r67457293
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -119,13 +119,7 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
@marmbrus @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13727
[SPARK-15982][SPARK-16009] Harmonize the behavior of
DataFrameReader.text/csv/json/parquet/orc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Issues with current reader behavior.
-
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13722#discussion_r67457183
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -455,6 +455,17 @@ setMethod("createOrReplaceTempView",
invisible(callJMethod(x@sdf,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13617
Thanks for the PR (with a great description)! FYI review on a big new
feature may need to wait until 2.0 QA is done.
Also, @mengxr @avulanov have discussed regression before, and IIRC it
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13684
LGTM. Merging into master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
Oh, I see. I will fix tonight.
Thank you, @tdas !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60675/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
**[Test build #60675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60675/consoleFull)**
for PR 13726 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
@dongjoon-hyun There is a corner case that this check does not handle. When
there are zero columns, the error is very non-intuitive.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16006
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60674/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13723
**[Test build #60674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60674/consoleFull)**
for PR 13723 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13394
LGTM
Merging with master
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60676/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
**[Test build #60676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60676/consoleFull)**
for PR 13725 at commit
Github user lw-lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
@ajbozarth Got it, that's a fatal bug. I will fix it in this PR. Thanks
again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13371
@liancheng Thanks! I didn't notice that. I will rerun the benchmark. I've
re-submitted this PR at #13701.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
They actually share the core majority of their code so your pagination is
already there, it just can't change pages or change the number of shown jobs. I
think its has to do with how your calling
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13720
**[Test build #60677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60677/consoleFull)**
for PR 13720 at commit
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
@ajbozarth Thanks for your checking and reporting. I didn't notice that the
UI for history servers are different and just changed the AllJobsPage.
I will try to check the page for history
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13708
@ajbozarth Thanks for pointing it out. It is true for both the stages page
and the job page. It doesn't keep track of the status of other tables when one
table is changed.
I will try to
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
**[Test build #60675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60675/consoleFull)**
for PR 13726 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
**[Test build #60676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60676/consoleFull)**
for PR 13725 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13726
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13725
cc @jkbradley I am sure that this tests this patch correctly anyway but
less sure that checking `scale` is sensible. I am not familiar with ML although
I know a bit. I will close it does not
1 - 100 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
