Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15251
**[Test build #3290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3290/consoleFull)**
for PR 15251 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15168
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR again, please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65945/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
**[Test build #65945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65945/consoleFull)**
for PR 15252 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65947/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
**[Test build #65947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65947/consoleFull)**
for PR 15242 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14897
**[Test build #65948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65948/consoleFull)**
for PR 14897 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15253
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15253
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65944/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15253
**[Test build #65944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65944/consoleFull)**
for PR 15253 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80623063
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/api/v1/ApplicationListResource.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,14 @@ private[v1] class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248#discussion_r80623021
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -178,6 +178,23 @@ class HistoryServer(
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15246
Hm, I see why this happens to work, because the file is not packaged inside
a jar file. Normally that's what getResource is for, and if it were in a jar
this wouldn't work. It's not a bad idea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65943/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
**[Test build #65943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65943/consoleFull)**
for PR 15252 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
... Hit a bug in the write path... Need to fix it at first...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
cc @JoshRosen and @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
Also need to add a test case for data source tables. Will do it later
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65942/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
**[Test build #65942 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65942/consoleFull)**
for PR 15250 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
Let me update the PR description just in case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
**[Test build #65947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65947/consoleFull)**
for PR 15242 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15242
@srowen I just took a scan twice and I think they should be all.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
I guess we can also remove another workaround
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v2.0.0/python/pyspark/rdd.py#L2320-L2328)
?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
**[Test build #65946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65946/consoleFull)**
for PR 15255 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
[SPARK-17680] [SQL] [TEST] Added a Testcase for Verifying Unicode Character
Support for Column Names and Comments
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When the version of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65941/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65941/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JasonMWhite commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
@davies you authored https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5570 and reported
the issue in Py4J https://github.com/bartdag/py4j/issues/160. I happened across
this while spelunking through Py4J
GitHub user JasonMWhite opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15254
[SPARK-17679] [PYSPARK] remove unnecessary Py4J ListConverter patch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes a patch on ListConverter from
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
This is awesome to separate this out. I should have time to review this
tomorrow and then hopefully we can (finally) merge this in the next few days!
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213
@scwf I understand that you were trying to make the least invasive fix
possible to deal with the problem. That's usually a good thing to do, but even
when that kind of fix is getting to the
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13998
I ran that test 100 times locally w/out error... you have any suggestions
on repro?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Cody Koeninger wrote:
> Sure I'll
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65939/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #65939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65939/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65938/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
**[Test build #65938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65938/consoleFull)**
for PR 15249 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80617904
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618
The changes in this PR becomes completely out-of-dated. Will resubmit a new
PR for it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Ok, finished a line-by-line compare + comment.
The biggest thing I'm having trouble reconciling is the stated emphasis on
limiting user options in order to give guarantees, yet throwing
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80617145
--- Diff: external/kafka-0-10-sql/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15221
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15221
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65940/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15221
**[Test build #65940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65940/consoleFull)**
for PR 15221 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80617036
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80616878
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
**[Test build #65945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65945/consoleFull)**
for PR 15252 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15213
@markhamstra in my fix i just want to make the minor changes for the
dagscheduer, and your fix is also ok to me, i can update this according your
comment. Thanks:)
/cc @zsxwing may also have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15253
**[Test build #65944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65944/consoleFull)**
for PR 15253 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15253
[SPARK-17678][REPL][Branch-1.6] Honor spark.replClassServer.port in
scala-2.11 repl
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark 1.6 Scala-2.11 repl doesn't honor
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80616386
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80616098
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cjjnjust commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172#discussion_r80615974
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/sasl/aes/SparkAesCipher.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15251
**[Test build #3290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3290/consoleFull)**
for PR 15251 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15251
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80615842
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
cc @hvanhovell for review. This is mostly simple copy/paste. I did look
over the warnings in IntelliJ and spacing issues.
Also @yhuai and @hvanhovell - I noticed there was virtually 0 unit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
**[Test build #65943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65943/consoleFull)**
for PR 15252 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15252
[SPARK-17677][SQL] Break WindowExec.scala into multiple files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As of Spark 2.0, all the window function execution code are in
WindowExec.scala.
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80615307
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090#discussion_r80615261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeColumnCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80614899
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80614481
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15251
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user danix800 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15243
Hi, @dongjoon-hyun . Fixed!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user danix800 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15243#discussion_r80614009
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerWatcher.scala ---
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
import
GitHub user danix800 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15251
Comment fixing
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix two comments since Actor is not used anymore.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
**[Test build #65942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65942/consoleFull)**
for PR 15250 at commit
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15250
[SPARK-17676][CORE] FsHistoryProvider should ignore hidden files
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
FsHistoryProvider was writing a hidden file (to check the fs's clock).
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80613358
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80613155
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80612809
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80612619
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15090
**[Test build #65941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65941/consoleFull)**
for PR 15090 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80612293
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80611556
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80611465
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user djvulee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
I would say this is a very important PR. As our experience, sometimes we
just need to skip some nodes for the bad disks,the exist blacklist mechanism
effects little.
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15221
**[Test build #65940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65940/consoleFull)**
for PR 15221 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80610814
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80610748
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80610562
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65937/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102
**[Test build #65937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65937/consoleFull)**
for PR 15102 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80610210
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
for anyone else who might be watching, I've carved out part of this change
here: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15102#discussion_r80609930
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
**[Test build #65938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65938/consoleFull)**
for PR 15249 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #65939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/65939/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
@kayousterhout after your suggestion to pull out a helper for blacklisting
with a TAskSet, I thought it might make sense to actually pull out everythign
related to TaskSets, so that we can make
1 - 100 of 536 matches
Mail list logo