Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68557 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68557/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837
**[Test build #68556 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68556/consoleFull)**
for PR 13837 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837
[SPARK-16126] [SQL] Better Error Message When using DataFrameReader without
`path`
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When users do not specify the path in
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87688739
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,66 @@ case class
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
So the simplest thing sounds like updating the error message, for now I'll
avoid changing the maven build since that might have some unintended collateral
effects and this change is currently
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563#discussion_r87688574
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ package object config {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
Any update on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
**[Test build #68555 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68555/consoleFull)**
for PR 15854 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87688495
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,66 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854#discussion_r87688482
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68554/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68554 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68554/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563#discussion_r87688398
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2578,26 +2579,38 @@ private[util] object CallerContext extends Logging {
*
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563#discussion_r87688391
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ package object config {
.booleanConf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68553/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68553 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68553/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68552/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860
**[Test build #68552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68552/consoleFull)**
for PR 15860 at commit
Github user minrk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
> Any ideas on how we could follow up and support that install pattern?
To go all the way to the two commands I expected to work based on Python
tradition:
```bash
./build/mvn
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854#discussion_r87687899
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types.MetadataBuilder
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563#discussion_r87687846
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2578,26 +2579,38 @@ private[util] object CallerContext extends Logging {
* @param
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Thanks @JoshRosen for taking time to review this. The factoured out fix is
at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860 :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68551/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
**[Test build #68551 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68551/consoleFull)**
for PR 15763 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68550/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68550 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68550/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68554 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68554/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
@minrk thanks :) Any ideas on how we could follow up and support that
install pattern?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68553 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68553/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87686589
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
org.apache.spark
spark-parent_2.11
+
--- End diff --
@JoshRosen so we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860
**[Test build #68552 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68552/consoleFull)**
for PR 15860 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
I agree that this case is fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
@joshrosen Is `shellcheck` intended to be part of our standard linting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87686249
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -187,10 +208,10 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
# We increment the Zinc port each time to
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15860
[SPARK-18418] Fix flags for make_binary_release for hadoop profile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the flags used to specify the hadoop version
## How was
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68548/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
**[Test build #68551 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68551/consoleFull)**
for PR 15763 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68548 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68548/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68547/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68549/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68547 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68547/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68549 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68549/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
@hvanhovell The PR description is updated. How about the latest change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68544/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15838
Is it good to go? @srowen @vanzin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
**[Test build #68544 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68544/consoleFull)**
for PR 15854 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
@kiszk I have not checked all the case yet but I think the case that we
need to generate else-clause doesn't match the case we discuss here.
Of course we can add the method you suggested when we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68546/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68546/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87685165
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -43,11 +43,38 @@ trait
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
Thanks a lot for the review, @tgravescs @mridulm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68550 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68550/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87684919
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +226,111 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
Merging into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68543/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
**[Test build #68543 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68543/consoleFull)**
for PR 15857 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r87684528
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystTypeConverters.scala
---
@@ -421,6 +421,17 @@ object CatalystTypeConverters {
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
Looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87683697
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +226,111 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87683492
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,66 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Thanks @dbtsai!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
@jkbradley Sounds making sense more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Thanks all for working on this PR. I merged this into master, and I'll
create a followup task and PR to handle the abstraction together with handling
the smoothing in the initialization of
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
@dongjoon-hyun Thanks! It has been merged. Could you close it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68542/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15856
**[Test build #68542 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68542/consoleFull)**
for PR 15856 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68549 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68549/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68548/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15853
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68545/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15853
**[Test build #68545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68545/consoleFull)**
for PR 15853 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68547 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68547/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
**[Test build #68546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68546/consoleFull)**
for PR 15859 at commit
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
Fixed state store bug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
StateStore.get() causes temporary files to be created immediately, even if
the store is not used to make updates for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15855
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68540/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15855
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15855
**[Test build #68540 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68540/consoleFull)**
for PR 15855 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15853
**[Test build #68545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68545/consoleFull)**
for PR 15853 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15854
**[Test build #68544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68544/consoleFull)**
for PR 15854 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87678827
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests-2 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87679919
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -187,10 +208,10 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
# We increment the Zinc port each time to
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87678482
--- Diff: dev/run-pip-tests ---
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659#discussion_r87677806
--- Diff: bin/beeline ---
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ set -o posix
# Figure out if SPARK_HOME is set
if [ -z "${SPARK_HOME}" ]; then
- export
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
