Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16054
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69299/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user Aegeaner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16054
dstreaming receiver for twitter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
implement a streaming receiver for twitter
## How was this patch tested?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
**[Test build #69309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69309/consoleFull)**
for PR 16048 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
**[Test build #69299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69299/consoleFull)**
for PR 15935 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
**[Test build #69308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69308/consoleFull)**
for PR 15954 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r89954432
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/SerializerManager.scala ---
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ private[spark] class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r89953368
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/CountMinSketchImpl.java
---
@@ -152,6 +153,16 @@ public void add(Object item) {
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15788
@jkbradley I agree that exposing probabilities is also useful to R users.
Think more about this issue, I think we can add a new argument ```type``` to
```predict```, this argument controls the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69307/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69305/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
**[Test build #69306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69306/consoleFull)**
for PR 16017 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69302/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
**[Test build #69302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69302/consoleFull)**
for PR 13557 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949
Merging this to master and 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
Thanks, @gatorsmile . Resolved the conflicts, and also added test case for
empty in clause with mixed case column name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
**[Test build #69304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69304/consoleFull)**
for PR 16045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017#discussion_r89949760
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -107,25 +107,41 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69301/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #69301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69301/consoleFull)**
for PR 16053 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
**[Test build #69303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69303/consoleFull)**
for PR 16052 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@witgo I took a look at this and had an idea for an alternate approach that
is much simpler. Can you take a look at #16053 and let me know what you think?
If we decide to go with the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
**[Test build #69302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69302/consoleFull)**
for PR 13557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
**[Test build #69301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69301/consoleFull)**
for PR 16053 at commit
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16053
[SPARK-17931] Eliminate unncessary task (de) serialization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the existing code, there are three layers of serialization
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69294/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949
**[Test build #69294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69294/consoleFull)**
for PR 15949 at commit
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
I'm not sure whether I understand the problem completely. It seems
WholeStage CodeGen wants the complete stage code in a single function. The fix
I made violates this because it creates
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
**[Test build #69300 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69300/consoleFull)**
for PR 16052 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69300/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16011
That's OK. I will improve the docs in another 2.1 QA PR and close this one.
Thanks for all your clarification. @MLnick @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16011
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69297/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
**[Test build #69297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69297/consoleFull)**
for PR 15848 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
cc @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
**[Test build #69300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69300/consoleFull)**
for PR 16052 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255#discussion_r89946590
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -148,6 +148,52 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
[SPARK-18617][CORE][STREAMING] Close "kryo auto pick" feature for Spark
Streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
#15992 provided a solution to fix the bug, i.e.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
cc @cloud-fan Could you review this PR? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89946424
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -76,9 +76,6 @@ class JDBCOptions(
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r89946344
--- Diff:
common/sketch/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/sketch/CountMinSketchImpl.java
---
@@ -152,6 +153,16 @@ public void add(Object item) {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89946224
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,6 +209,14 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user ChorPangChan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000#discussion_r89945721
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -145,6 +146,10 @@ private[ui] class StreamingPage(parent:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89945683
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,13 +667,13 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517#discussion_r89945485
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -747,16 +800,25 @@ def _test():
except py4j.protocol.Py4JError:
spark =
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
@kapilsingh5050 any update?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
Why is this a blocker thing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
**[Test build #69284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69284/consoleFull)**
for PR 16048 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69284/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16041
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16041
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000#discussion_r89943946
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingPage.scala ---
@@ -145,6 +146,10 @@ private[ui] class StreamingPage(parent:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69298/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69298/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69290/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
**[Test build #69290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69290/consoleFull)**
for PR 15954 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16033#discussion_r89942478
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/partial/ApproximateActionListener.scala ---
@@ -34,11 +34,13 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
**[Test build #69299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69299/consoleFull)**
for PR 15935 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15981
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15981
LGTM. The build for the latest commit passed. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
gentle ping @vectorijk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16051
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16051
Merging to master and 2.1 to unblock other PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16051
**[Test build #69296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69296/consoleFull)**
for PR 16051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16051
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16051
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69288/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69298/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
**[Test build #69288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69288/consoleFull)**
for PR 15954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16050
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16050
**[Test build #69285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69285/consoleFull)**
for PR 16050 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16044
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16044
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16044
**[Test build #69287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69287/consoleFull)**
for PR 16044 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
**[Test build #69293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69293/consoleFull)**
for PR 15954 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69293/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user skanjila commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
I've changed the underlying trait for LogisticRegressionSuite and
OneVsRestSuite to use local[2], will add in python changes next , want to get
this PR across with this set of changes
---
If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16049
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848
**[Test build #69297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69297/consoleFull)**
for PR 15848 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16049
Merging to master/2.1! Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69286/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
**[Test build #69286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69286/consoleFull)**
for PR 16045 at commit
1 - 100 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
