Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186#discussion_r91240700
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerBus.scala
---
@@ -63,18 +83,29 @@ class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user lklong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16191
hi ,could somebody help to rely this question?
thanks very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
**[Test build #69782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69782/consoleFull)**
for PR 16192 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
[SPARK-18764][Core]Add a warning log when skipping a corrupted file
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It's better to add a warning log when skipping a corrupted file. It
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69780/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69780/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16191
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zhuangxue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16191
spark decision tree
What algorithm is used in spark decision tree (is ID3, C4.5 or CART)?
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user sarutak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
@viirya Thanks! I've fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
I think the jira number should be SPARK-18762, instead of SPARK-18761.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
**[Test build #69781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69781/consoleFull)**
for PR 16190 at commit
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
[SPARK-18761][WEBUI] Web UI should be http:4040 instead of https:4040
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When SSL is enabled, the Spark shell shows:
```
Spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69780/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
**[Test build #69779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69779/consoleFull)**
for PR 16187 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
@zsxwing shouldn't we at least log the exception?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69777/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69777/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69778/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69778/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69778/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69772/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
**[Test build #69772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69772/consoleFull)**
for PR 16187 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168
@hvanhovell @nsyca @gatorsmile @rxin Thank you for your suggestions! I will
try to make a better approach ASAP! Thank youï¼
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16173
ok, the BroadcastFactory' comment shows `SparkContext uses a user-specified
BroadcastFactory implementation to instantiate a particular broadcast for
the
entire Spark job.` so I think it
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91235259
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -448,19 +476,105 @@ class SQLViewSuite extends
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91235206
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -55,16 +55,19 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91235152
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +146,55 @@ private[hive] class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91235127
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91235062
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91235005
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -161,12 +163,7 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
* @param
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91234885
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -114,9 +117,26 @@ private[hive] class
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91234770
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -114,9 +117,26 @@ private[hive] class
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91234781
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/JobCancellationSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,6 +209,41 @@ class JobCancellationSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121#discussion_r91234665
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -278,50 +278,51 @@ def __repr__(self):
return "AutoBatchedSerializer(%s)" % self.serializer
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121#discussion_r91232276
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ def load_stream(self, stream):
raise NotImplementedError
def
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121#discussion_r91234619
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -278,50 +278,51 @@ def __repr__(self):
return "AutoBatchedSerializer(%s)" % self.serializer
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91234733
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91234634
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -229,9 +230,11 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69777/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91234685
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -192,13 +189,17 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
serializedTask:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #69776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69776/consoleFull)**
for PR 16189 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91234443
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -207,31 +205,56 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69775/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
[SPARK-18761][CORE][WIP] Introduce "task reaper" to oversee task killing in
executors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark's current task cancellation / task
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69775/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91234292
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -207,31 +205,56 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #69775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69775/consoleFull)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16168#discussion_r91234171
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -207,31 +205,56 @@ case class CreateViewCommand(
}
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16131
@srowen Is this ready to be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91232450
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1389,7 +1399,9 @@ setMethod("spark.gaussianMixture", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula =
# Get the
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
@marmbrus @zsxwing @brkyvz Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91232063
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1852,9 +1867,9 @@ summary.treeEnsemble <- function(model) {
# Get the summary of a Random Forest
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
Actually if possible please merge this in branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #3471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3471/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #69774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69774/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91231575
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -661,7 +665,10 @@ setMethod("fitted", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
# Get the summary of a k-means model
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16165
**[Test build #69773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69773/consoleFull)**
for PR 16165 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91231272
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -1389,7 +1399,9 @@ setMethod("spark.gaussianMixture", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula =
# Get the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16186
**[Test build #69769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69769/consoleFull)**
for PR 16186 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91231151
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -661,7 +665,10 @@ setMethod("fitted", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
# Get the summary of a k-means model
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16188
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69771/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user zhuangxue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16188
Branch 1.6 decision tree
What algorithm is used in spark decision tree (is ID3, C4.5 or CART)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16182
**[Test build #69771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69771/consoleFull)**
for PR 16182 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
Merging this to master and 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
**[Test build #69772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69772/consoleFull)**
for PR 16187 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16187
[SPARK-18760][SQL] Consistent format specification for FileFormats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently rely on FileFormat implementations to override toString in
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
ping?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15628
ping @dbtsai :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6848
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16181
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8318
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9543
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7265
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69767/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16184
**[Test build #69767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69767/consoleFull)**
for PR 16184 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9543
I'm going to close this one for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785
@tribbloid is this a problem that needs to be fixed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7265
I'm gong to close this for now. Next year we might actually come back and
revisit this - probably not with the current parquet implementation since it is
not very efficient, but some sort of columnar
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6848
I'm going to close this for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
cc @ericl can you take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
This LGTM. Now that I'm looking at it, the test suite **never actually
tests for correctness**, just basic input/output sizes. We really should have
better tests, but it's ok with me if it's done in
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
I haven't been able to get a proper unit test environment running where the
embedded metastore conf is different from the client conf. I did validate that
Spark without this patch failed to execute
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
The schema inferring is replaced with metastore schema completely in
#14690. I think we can close this now? cc @cloud-fan @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69764/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
