Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73405/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73405/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user highfei2011 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17035
PreferredLocation calculation is more complex, reflected in the code which
part of it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user watermen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r102892814
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputStatistics.scala ---
@@ -23,5 +23,9 @@ package org.apache.spark
* @param shuffleId ID of the
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17000
cc @yanboliang - it seems actually similar in effect to the VL-BFGS work
with RDD-based coefficients?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
**[Test build #73410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73410/testReport)**
for PR 17056 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r102891969
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -39,16 +40,18 @@ private[spark] sealed trait MapStatus {
* necessary
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
[SPARK-17495] [SQL] Support Decimal type in Hive-hash
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Hive hash to support Decimal datatype. [Hive internally normalises
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73409/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
**[Test build #73408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73408/testReport)**
for PR 17055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17050
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73397/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17050
**[Test build #73397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73397/testReport)**
for PR 17050 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73400/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
[SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an non-existent location
should work
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This JIRA is a follow up work after SPARK-19583
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73400/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053#discussion_r102890922
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalog.scala
---
@@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73396/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73396/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17054
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user HarshSharma8 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17054
Refactored the code to remove redundency of count operation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Removed the redundant count operation which is generating same result
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73407/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053#discussion_r102889140
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalog.scala
---
@@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog {
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r10239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -398,6 +398,27 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
LGTM, pending test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r102888024
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -398,6 +398,27 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
**[Test build #73406 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73406/testReport)**
for PR 17053 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r102887733
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -398,6 +398,27 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73405 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73405/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
**[Test build #73404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73404/testReport)**
for PR 17051 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17053
[SPARK-18939][SQL] Timezone support in partition values.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr of #16308 and #16750.
This pr enables timezone
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r102887655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -1,511 +1,509 @@
-/*
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r102887355
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -1,511 +1,509 @@
-/*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
**[Test build #73403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73403/testReport)**
for PR 17052 at commit
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
[SPARK-19690][SS] Join a streaming DataFrame with a batch DataFrame which
has an aggregation may not work
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
@cloud-fan @gatorsmile I've updated this pr and also added test cases,
please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594#discussion_r102887155
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -794,6 +795,7 @@ EXPLAIN: 'EXPLAIN';
FORMAT: 'FORMAT';
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051#discussion_r102887105
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -1,511 +1,509 @@
-/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73393/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16594
**[Test build #73402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73402/testReport)**
for PR 16594 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73393/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
**[Test build #73401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73401/testReport)**
for PR 17051 at commit
GitHub user lins05 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
[SPARK-17075][SQL] Follow up: fix file line ending and improve the tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed the line ending of `FilterEstimation.scala`. Also improved
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17051
cc @ron8hu @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73400/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73399 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73399/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
**[Test build #73398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73398/testReport)**
for PR 17049 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049#discussion_r102882775
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -71,6 +75,242 @@ class
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049#discussion_r102882772
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -781,12 +780,12 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049#discussion_r102881875
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -781,12 +780,12 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73391/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696
**[Test build #73391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73391/testReport)**
for PR 16696 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17050
**[Test build #73397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73397/testReport)**
for PR 17050 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73390/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
**[Test build #73390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73390/testReport)**
for PR 15125 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17050
[SPARK-19722] [SQL] [MINOR] Clean up the usage of EliminateSubqueryAliases
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403, we
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Looks good except that comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049#discussion_r102881054
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -71,6 +75,242 @@ class HashExpressionsSuite
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15047
@gatorsmile + @rxin : I had made a note of your comments but was not able
to get to it that time because I had other time critical projects to be worked
on. I have put out a PR which improves
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
**[Test build #73395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73395/testReport)**
for PR 17049 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73395/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
**[Test build #73395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73395/testReport)**
for PR 17049 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73396/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17049
[SPARK-17495] Add more tests for hive hash
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds tests hive-hash by comparing the outputs generated against
Hive 1.2.1.
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
yes,it is for HiveExternalCatalog.
when I do this [PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996), I found
the logic.
>The hive.metastore.warehouse.dir in sparkConf still take
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73394/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
**[Test build #73394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73394/testReport)**
for PR 17048 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17038
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73387/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17038
**[Test build #73387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73387/testReport)**
for PR 17038 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
**[Test build #73394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73394/testReport)**
for PR 17048 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
ping @jkbradley , backport for branch2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17048
[SPARK-14772][PYTHON][ML] Fixed Params.copy method to match Scala
implementation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixed the PySpark Params.copy method to behave like the
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73389/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73385/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16996
**[Test build #73389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73389/testReport)**
for PR 16996 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
**[Test build #73385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73385/testReport)**
for PR 17047 at commit
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73388/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #73388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73388/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73393/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17036
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
