GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17079
[SPARK-19748][SQL]refresh function has an wrong order to do cache
invalidate and regenerate the inmemory var for InMemoryFileIndex with
FileStatusCache
## What changes were proposed in this
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103147221
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -23,7 +23,10 @@ import java.util.Properties
import
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103143687
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
private val
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103143673
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -114,22 +116,34 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
@felixcheung I have made the changes per our review discussion. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r103140028
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputStatistics.scala ---
@@ -23,5 +23,9 @@ package org.apache.spark
* @param shuffleId ID of the
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r103140017
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -39,16 +40,18 @@ private[spark] sealed trait MapStatus {
* necessary
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r103139360
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2038,6 +2038,53 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(data,
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076#discussion_r103139054
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -440,19 +440,9 @@ private class LinearSVCAggregator(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r103138824
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,101 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076
ping @yanboliang @AnthonyTruchet
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
[SPARK-19746][ML] Faster indexing for logistic aggregator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JIRA: [SPARK-19746](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19746)
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17078
ping @dbtsai @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r103138278
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2038,6 +2038,53 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df =
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
Thanks for cc'ing me. Let me please @davies as he was reviewing it and it
seems close to be merged and also @holdenk.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r103138165
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -545,6 +545,55 @@ def partitionBy(self, *cols):
self._jwrite =
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077
[SPARK-16931][PYTHON][SQL] Add Python wrapper for bucketBy
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adds Python wrappers for `DataFrameWriter.bucketBy` and
Github user HarshSharma8 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17058
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HarshSharma8 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17054
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17052
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17076
[SPARK-19745][ML] SVCAggregator captures coefficients in its closure
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JIRA:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517#discussion_r103135331
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -747,16 +800,25 @@ def _test():
except py4j.protocol.Py4JError:
spark =
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517#discussion_r103134846
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -747,16 +800,25 @@ def _test():
except py4j.protocol.Py4JError:
spark =
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677#discussion_r103134610
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -90,25 +95,101 @@ trait BaseLimitExec extends UnaryExecNode with
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910#discussion_r103134443
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -114,22 +114,30 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath =
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16966
@MLnick I did some experiments with WEX datasets. I have put the results in
the description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17064
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
@tejasapatil Sorry to bother, is there still something need to modify?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16965
The number of rows would be O(LN). The memory usage will be different as
the size of each row has changed before and after the explode. Also the
Catalyst Optimizer may do projections during join
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17075
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user wojtek-szymanski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17075
[SPARK-19727][SQL] Fix for round function that modifies original column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix for SQL round function that modifies original
Github user lvdongr closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16879
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
@jkbradley Thanks for your reply! I quickly go through your suggestions. If
I understand correctly, you prefer making it a `Transformer`, as we previously
discussed, but changing the input
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17024
I wonder if adding an extension (to the file) helps based on codec ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17024
@aramesh117 looks good !
I would also like someone working on streaming to chime in - since that is
a common usecase for checkpoint.
+CC @tdas, @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Rebased to master and tests updated. @zsxwing would you take another look
when you've got a minute?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
I probably did not convey my idea properly ...
What I meant was, the only change required be :
`logTrace(s"Dropping events $event")` in `def onDropEvent(event:
SparkListenerEvent): Unit`
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517#discussion_r103122180
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -747,16 +800,25 @@ def _test():
except py4j.protocol.Py4JError:
spark =
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73497/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73497 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73497/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73496/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
**[Test build #73496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73496/testReport)**
for PR 16991 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
Thanks @BryanCutler for the patch! The fix looks reasonable to me, but let
me try to check with @davies to confirm.
If this is the right approach, then I think we should update the other
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73497 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73497/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Thanks for the thorough feedback.
In the latest update I refactored ```convertToLogicalRelation()``` to
update the schema of the ```catalogTable``` field of the value it returns
whenever a
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116512
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -161,22 +164,51 @@ private[hive] class
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116519
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116521
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116516
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116517
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSchemaInferenceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r103116509
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -226,6 +258,41 @@ private[hive] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
**[Test build #3586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3586/testReport)**
for PR 16782 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
**[Test build #3586 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3586/testReport)**
for PR 16782 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
**[Test build #73496 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73496/testReport)**
for PR 16991 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73495/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #73495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73495/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73494/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73494/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17060
Thank you @srowen @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
I decided to provide a few more bencharks in order to alleviate some of the
concerns raised by @srowen.
To reproduce the results add the following snippet in the ALSSuite class:
Github user taroplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
@holdenk
I believe this was introduced in this change
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fa0524fd02eedd0bbf1edc750dc3997a86ea25f5#diff-bb538fda94224dd0af01d0fd7e1b4ea0R39
the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #73495 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73495/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
@mridulm thanks, I have changed the code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73494/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
Thanks for working on this. It's been awhile since I looked at the
classloader bits so I'd need to refresh my memory a bit, but regardless this PR
probably needs better tests - specifically
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user taroplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
@holdenk @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user taroplus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
[SPARK-18646][REPL] Set parent classloader as null for ExecutorClassLoader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
By default, a class loader will have java's system class
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
Added support for Java Maps with support for pre-allocation (capacity
argument on constructor) and sensible defaults for interfaces/abstract classes.
Also includes implicit encoders.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73493 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73486/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73486 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73486/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73485/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73485 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73485/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73491/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73491 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73491/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73489/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73489/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73488/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73488 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73488/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
