Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093#discussion_r103627943
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileIndexSuite.scala
---
@@ -179,6 +180,21 @@ class FileIndexSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73667/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103627873
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
**[Test build #73667 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73667/testReport)**
for PR 17111 at commit
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103627459
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093#discussion_r103627064
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileIndexSuite.scala
---
@@ -179,6 +180,21 @@ class FileIndexSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
LGTM. cc @cloud-fan for final signing-off
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17105
@felixcheung Thanks for the clarification. I will close this then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user actuaryzhang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17105
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Thank you! I checked Hive 2.1. It has the exactly same hash values.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Ok. I will put it in inline-table.sql.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Put the test case in a sql file?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
cc @ueshin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73672/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17062
Updated comments with the corresponding hive queries used to generate the
expected outputs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103622591
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -621,6 +615,80 @@ class
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r103622493
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -454,33 +452,15 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
**[Test build #73671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73671/testReport)**
for PR 17114 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
@gatorsmile : I really appreciate your help in reviewing this PR to the
extent that you are manually checking the hashes over Hive. If you haven't
already embarked on that, here is the set of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73664/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
[SPARK-19758][SQL] Resolving timezone aware expressions with time zone when
resolving inline table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we resolve inline tables in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17088
**[Test build #73664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73664/testReport)**
for PR 17088 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73665/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73665 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73665/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73660/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #73660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73660/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73658/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
**[Test build #73658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73658/testReport)**
for PR 16867 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
**[Test build #73670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73670/testReport)**
for PR 17056 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73666/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73666/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103618852
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -732,6 +743,51 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103618856
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -732,6 +743,51 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17032
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
merged to master and branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73662/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16677
**[Test build #73662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73662/testReport)**
for PR 16677 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
**[Test build #73669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73669/testReport)**
for PR 17099 at commit
Github user stanzhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Thanks for @gatorsmile 's help.
`ConstantFolding` will affect other test cases in
`FoldablePropagationSuite`.
It's fine without adding `ConstantFolding`.
Before fix:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056
Let me manually check whether the results are consistent with Hive.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103616628
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -732,6 +743,51 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17056#discussion_r103616585
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
---
@@ -732,6 +743,51 @@ object HiveHashFunction extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73656/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
LGTM except https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093#discussion_r103616280
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #73668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73668/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17001
**[Test build #73656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73656/testReport)**
for PR 17001 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093#discussion_r103616280
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileIndexSuite.scala
---
@@ -179,6 +180,21 @@ class FileIndexSuite extends
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
[SPARK-13669][Core]Improve the blacklist mechanism to handle external
shuffle service unavailable situation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we are running
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17105
so tl; dr; I think we should support duplicated name like everything else
in Spark does.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17105
@actuaryzhang there's a bit of a history about this... but long story
short, Spark does support DataFrame with multiple columns having the same name,
for example
```
# in pyspark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73659/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73651/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
**[Test build #73659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73659/testReport)**
for PR 17099 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17047
**[Test build #73651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73651/testReport)**
for PR 17047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
**[Test build #73667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73667/testReport)**
for PR 17111 at commit
Github user pwoody commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16959#discussion_r103612654
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/OutputCommitCoordinatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -195,6 +195,17 @@ class OutputCommitCoordinatorSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73653/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73653/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73666/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73643/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16883
**[Test build #73643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73643/testReport)**
for PR 16883 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73665/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099#discussion_r103611097
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -130,6 +130,20 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099#discussion_r103610959
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -130,6 +130,20 @@ class
Github user Gauravshah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16842
@brkyvz Thank you for taking this forward. We have batch interval of 2
minutes & takes ~1.1 minutes to process. With older code it takes 10-12 minutes
to recover and with limit fix it recovers
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73648/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73649/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17111
**[Test build #73649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73649/testReport)**
for PR 17111 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73648/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73663/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73663/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73646/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #73646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73646/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10307
**[Test build #73647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73647/testReport)**
for PR 10307 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
**[Test build #73661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73661/testReport)**
for PR 16910 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73661/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 781 matches
Mail list logo
