Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17239
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user nischay21 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17239
Using map function in spark for huge operation
We need to calculate distance matrix like jaccard on huge collection of
Dataset in spark.
Facing couple of issues. Kindly help us to give
Github user jbax commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177
Doesn't seem correct to me. All test cases are using broken CSV and trigger
the parser handling of unescaped quotes, where it tries to rescue the data and
produce something sensible. See my test case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74305/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74305/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
just found out that we didn't implement a type coercion rule for `stack`...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
For me, LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188#discussion_r105343821
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17238
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user morenn520 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17238
getRackForHost returns None if host is unknown by driver
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19894
## How was this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74305/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175#discussion_r105342800
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicPhysicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -78,9 +78,42 @@ case class ProjectExec(projectList:
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17224
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17224
I am closing this per
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226#issuecomment-285597434
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
I see. So, `count` in "**Spark 2.1.0** (and presumably 2.0.x/master)" was
unexpectedly introduced by the optimization in SPARK-13749 and this behaviour
change between 1.6 and master (whether it
Github user dongjinleekr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17225#discussion_r105342714
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/io/CompressionCodec.scala ---
@@ -49,13 +50,14 @@ private[spark] object CompressionCodec {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188#discussion_r105342563
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74304/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74303/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74301/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74301 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74301/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
**[Test build #74301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74301/testReport)**
for PR 17237 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
**[Test build #74302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74302/testReport)**
for PR 17188 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user VinceShieh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17237
[SPARK-19852][PYSPARK][ML] Update Python API setHandleInvalid for
StringIndexer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to maintain API parity with changes made
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
cool! merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
**[Test build #74300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74300/testReport)**
for PR 17236 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
cc @yhuai @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17236
[SPARK-][SQL] Cannot run intersect/except with map type
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In spark SQL, map type can't be used in equality test/comparison, and
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17138
@nsyca Yes you're right. There's still much room of optimization. We will
improve Spark's optimizer gradually :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user tnachen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
@srowen @mgummelt PTAL
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r105337154
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1339,6 +1339,11 @@ test_that("column functions", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177#discussion_r105337093
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -693,8 +697,8 @@ def text(self, path, compression=None):
@since(2.0)
def
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17164
@hvanhovell ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r105336865
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1339,6 +1339,11 @@ test_that("column functions", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192#discussion_r105336776
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1339,6 +1339,11 @@ test_that("column functions", {
expect_equal(collect(select(df,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234#discussion_r105336208
--- Diff: R/pkg/DESCRIPTION ---
@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ Collate:
'types.R'
'utils.R'
'window.R'
-RoxygenNote: 5.0.1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
**[Test build #74299 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74299/testReport)**
for PR 17109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74299/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17170
I can see your point, but renaming it only on the R side is not really
addressing the issue.
Please feel free to open a JIRA on spark.ml FPGrowth and start a discussion
there.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17109
**[Test build #74299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74299/testReport)**
for PR 17109 at commit
Github user ep1804 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177
Documentation for DataFrameReader, DataFrameWriter, DataStreamReader,
readwriter.py and streaming.py are written. Check please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74298/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
**[Test build #74298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74298/testReport)**
for PR 17232 at commit
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
@HyukjinKwon There is an inconsistency/regression but its not being
introduced in this PR, its already there. Take an example without null as a
pivot column value like below. The only difference is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17235
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user yanji84 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17235
[SPARK-19320][MESOS][WIP]allow specifying a hard limit on number of gpus
required in each spark executor when running on mesos
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user benradford commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234
ok to test
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user benradford opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17234
[SPARK-19892][MLlib] Implement findAnalogies method for Word2VecModel
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added findAnalogies method to Word2VecModel for performing
Github user tanejagagan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174#discussion_r105333124
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -324,14 +324,22 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user carsonwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan @yhuai , can you help review and merge this minor
one line fix? The code change itself is straightforward.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user crackcell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
@cloud-fan Would you please review my code again? I'm now using `Option` to
handle NULLs. :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ep1804 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177
An issue is raised for uniVocity parser:
https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers/issues/143
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user crackcell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17233
[SPARK-11569][ML] Fix StringIndexer to handle null value properly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to enhance StringIndexer with NULL values handling.
Github user ep1804 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17177
Thank you @HyukjinKwon .
I made changes following your comments:
* `escapeQuoteEscaping` instead of `escapeEscape`
* defalutl value to `\u` (unset)
* `withTempPath`
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74297/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
**[Test build #74297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74297/testReport)**
for PR 17172 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17172
**[Test build #74296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74296/testReport)**
for PR 17172 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74295/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
**[Test build #74295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74295/testReport)**
for PR 17226 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
**[Test build #74298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74298/testReport)**
for PR 17232 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17232
[SPARK-18112] [SQL] Support reading data from Hive 2.1 metastore [WIP]
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to support reading data from Hive 2.1 metastore. Need
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74294/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
> we're not introducing a regression in this PR by fixing the NPE, the
answer given by 1.6 was incorrect under any interpenetration
Right, if it was a bug, then this PR introduces an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
**[Test build #74293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74293/testReport)**
for PR 17231 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
**[Test build #74294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74294/testReport)**
for PR 17231 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17231
**[Test build #74292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74292/testReport)**
for PR 17231 at commit
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
@HyukjinKwon we're not introducing a regression in this PR by fixing the
NPE, the answer given by 1.6 was incorrect under any interpenetration. Again,
there is a completely separate issue of what the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17224#discussion_r105327492
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -524,15 +529,21 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
cc @cloud-fan and @yhuai could you pick up one of them? Let me follow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
> Spark 2.0+ with PivotFirst gives a NPE when one of the pivot column
values is null. The main thing fixed in this PR.
I meant to say it is not fully fixed because it does not NPE but
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
BTW for 3 above if we decide it should be 0, we can add an initial value
for `PivotFirst` to make the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
There are three things going on here in your one example.
1. Spark 1.6 [first version with pivot] (and Spark 2.0+ with an aggregate
output type unsupported by PivotFirst) gives incorrect
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226#discussion_r105325964
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105323172
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105322928
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105324269
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConvertersSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105321731
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105322470
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105322707
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17226
@aray, this is a regression as I described in my PR that is introduced by
this optimization.
Spark 1.6.
```
+++---+
| a|null| 1|
+++---+
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105322098
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105322283
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user julienledem commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r105321652
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software
1 - 100 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
