Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17467
@HyukjinKwon What should be the next steps for this PR. Are there any
Spark-Kinesis experts who can review the patch ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
The test was interrupted and need a retest.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450#discussion_r108843221
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ case class Lower(child:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419#discussion_r108840757
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419#discussion_r108840709
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Thank you so much! :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17476
**[Test build #75379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75379/testReport)**
for PR 17476 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17476
cc @ericl, @bogdanrdc, @adrian-ionescu, @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17476
[SPARK-20151][SQL] Account for partition pruning in scan metadataTime
metrics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-20136, we report metadata timing metrics in scan
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
merged to master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Will review it tonight.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419#discussion_r108838518
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,746 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16019
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75378/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #75378 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75378/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17451
**[Test build #75378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75378/testReport)**
for PR 17451 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472#discussion_r108837689
--- Diff: common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/Platform.java
---
@@ -46,18 +46,22 @@
private static final boolean unaligned;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
**[Test build #75377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75377/testReport)**
for PR 17436 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450#discussion_r108837093
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ case class Lower(child:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17469#discussion_r108835449
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -124,6 +124,35 @@ def _(self, other):
return _
+like_doc = """ Return a Boolean
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108835232
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2747,6 +2747,17 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
Github user wesm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108834631
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2747,6 +2747,17 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108834618
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2828,4 +2839,16 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
Hi @squito , would you please review the code again? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452
OKï¼will do. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108834139
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2747,6 +2747,17 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108833855
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@
from pyspark.sql.utils import AnalysisException, ParseException,
IllegalArgumentException
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r108833416
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@
from pyspark.sql.utils import AnalysisException, ParseException,
IllegalArgumentException
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17424
I am not sure if it helps review by dumping the output of `DESC EXTENDED
FUNCTION` to the test. We may not frequently change the output as I see. IMHO,
It is hard to tell which is "correct" output
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r108830896
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/statsEstimation/FilterEstimationSuite.scala
---
@@ -450,6 +467,69 @@ class
Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
@cloud-fan Do you have comment on this version?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
**[Test build #75374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75374/testReport)**
for PR 17475 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75376/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
**[Test build #75376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75376/testReport)**
for PR 15334 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
Let me merge this now. I will send a follow-up PR to take the logical
planning time into account (otherwise in the vast majority of cases, i.e.
pruned partitions, the metadata operation time will be
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75375/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17470
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
Yea, it might be less important but I guess still it is a valid backport.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
tentative looks good, my only question is if someone wants to use Python
3.6 (first released December 2016) are they likely to want to use it with Spark
1.6 (first released January 2016)?
---
If
GitHub user zjffdu reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
[SPARK-19439][PYSPARK][SQL] PySpark's registerJavaFunction Should Support
UDAFs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support register Java UDAFs in PySpark so that user
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17222
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
LGTM, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394
**[Test build #75370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75370/testReport)**
for PR 17394 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75371/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17473
**[Test build #75371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75371/testReport)**
for PR 17473 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15334
**[Test build #75376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75376/testReport)**
for PR 15334 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75369/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75369/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75375/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
**[Test build #75374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75374/testReport)**
for PR 17475 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17417
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75368/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17417
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17475
[SPARK-20148] [SQL] Extend the file commit API to allow subscribing to task
commit messages
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The internal FileCommitProtocol interface
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17417
**[Test build #75368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75368/testReport)**
for PR 17417 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
So is the problem that it downloads `stanford-corenlp-3.4.1-models.jar` but
thinks it is `stanford-corenlp-3.4.1.jar`?
It looks like it might be possible to add the classifier to
Github user umehrot2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17445
@kayousterhout Thanks for your response, and for that link. Well it does
seem like #17088 addresses the same issue as this PR.
However, I would like the you all to review this PR as well,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r108810108
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,8 +565,143 @@ case
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450#discussion_r108809796
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ case class Lower(child:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
**[Test build #75373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75373/testReport)**
for PR 17474 at commit
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
**[Test build #75373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75373/testReport)**
for PR 17474 at commit
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17474
[Minor][SparkR]: Add run command comment in examples
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There are two examples in r folder missing the run commands.
In this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75372/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
**[Test build #75372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75372/testReport)**
for PR 17472 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
**[Test build #75372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75372/testReport)**
for PR 17472 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
Clear code comments can help code reading. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472#discussion_r108802741
--- Diff: common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/Platform.java
---
@@ -46,18 +46,22 @@
private static final boolean unaligned;
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17449
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r108802255
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -735,7 +749,12 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17449
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009#discussion_r108801550
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -735,7 +749,12 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75367/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user allengeorge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
I suggest the following code for `outputOrdering`:
```
override def outputOrdering: Seq[SortOrder] = child.outputOrdering.map {
case s @ SortOrder(e, _) =>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75367/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user samelamin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17472
@gatorsmile moved the comment per your suggestion, but to be honest if the
comment is unclear surly the first thing someone will do is check that JIRA?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16541
I sent a pr #17473.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
