Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75472 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75472/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109340165
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,220 @@ case
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517#discussion_r109336446
--- Diff: docs/building-spark.md ---
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ Developers who compile Spark frequently may want to
speed up compilation; e.g.,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517#discussion_r109336475
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ building for particular Hive and Hive Thriftserver
distributions.
Please refer to the [Configuration
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517#discussion_r109336405
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ In the API, an application is referenced by its
application ID, `[app-id]`.
When running on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517
**[Test build #75471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75471/testReport)**
for PR 17517 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517
cc @srowen. Could you take a look please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517#discussion_r109336173
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ In the API, an application is referenced by its
application ID, `[app-id]`.
When running on
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17517
[MINOR][DOCS] Replace non-breaking space to normal spaces that breaks
rendering markdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It seems there are several non-breaking
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
merged to branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
while we are skipping that one test here, the test actual will pass when
run - it's just that when running as `R CMD check`, `SPARK_HOME =
~/.cache/spark/spark*` whereas `spark-warehouse` and
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
LGTM. I think this fix is fine for 2.1 branch (though its a shame as this
was one of the main changes we were trying to get in 2.1 ?)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75470/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75470 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75470/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
So does the current patch pass `R CMD check` when run on the master branch ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
Looking at this now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109326608
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,225 @@ case
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
LGTM cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483#discussion_r109325537
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/catalog.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
See the [code
changes](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d9c24b3dc5ca64cf8aecebf58f22a3a2e5aab821)
I made in my private branch.
To generate the new result file after you add the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109324280
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,220 @@ case
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109323975
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,225 @@ case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415
**[Test build #75470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75470/testReport)**
for PR 17415 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
unlike in Jenkins, R CMD check looks to be running each test R file with
the current directory set to its directory (eg.
spark/R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/ for test_sparkSQL.R)
unless
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
**[Test build #75468 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75468/testReport)**
for PR 17515 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75468/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
AppVeyor doesn't run for branch-*, so the red mark is expected.
This should be good to go to branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109323394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,225 @@ case
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109323397
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,225 @@ case
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r109323376
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -550,6 +565,225 @@ case
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
WIP - testing this out in Jenkins, AppVeyor.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
**[Test build #75469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75469/testReport)**
for PR 17516 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75469/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
**[Test build #75469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75469/testReport)**
for PR 17516 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17516
[SPARK-20197][SPARKR][WIP] improve check for directory to cover differences
with R CMD check
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Check both SPARK_HOME and current
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326#discussion_r109322968
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -292,7 +290,100 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326#discussion_r109323006
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -292,7 +290,100 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326#discussion_r109322987
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -292,7 +290,100 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326#discussion_r109322980
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -292,7 +290,100 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15326
Jenkins this is OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
**[Test build #75468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75468/testReport)**
for PR 17515 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17515
[SPARK-20197][SPARKR] CRAN check fail with package installation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test failed because SPARK_HOME is not set before Spark is installed.
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17514
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17514
[SPARK-20197][SPARKR] CRAN check fail with package installation
Test failed because SPARK_HOME is not set before Spark is installed.
Also current directory is not == SPARK_HOME when tests
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17513
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17513
[SPARK-20197][SPARKR] CRAN check fail with package installation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Test failed because SPARK_HOME is not set before Spark is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
@gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user johnc1231 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459
Addressed comments where everything was clear, replied to the last one
about only having one toBlockMatrix. Back to you @viirya . Thanks for feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75466/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
**[Test build #75466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75466/testReport)**
for PR 17512 at commit
Github user johnc1231 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459#discussion_r109320701
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrixSuite.scala
---
@@ -89,11 +89,42 @@ class IndexedRowMatrixSuite
Github user johnc1231 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459#discussion_r109320642
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -113,6 +114,67 @@ class IndexedRowMatrix
Github user johnc1231 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459#discussion_r109320468
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -113,6 +114,67 @@ class IndexedRowMatrix
Github user johnc1231 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459#discussion_r109320386
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrixSuite.scala
---
@@ -89,11 +89,42 @@ class IndexedRowMatrixSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75464/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
**[Test build #75464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75464/testReport)**
for PR 17510 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
@gatorsmile @shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75467/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
**[Test build #75467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75467/testReport)**
for PR 17511 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
**[Test build #75467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75467/testReport)**
for PR 17511 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
**[Test build #75466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75466/testReport)**
for PR 17512 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75463/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
**[Test build #75463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75463/testReport)**
for PR 17487 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17512
[SPARK-20196][PYTHON][SQL] update doc for catalog functions, pyspark
refreshByPath API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Update doc to remove external for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75462/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
**[Test build #75462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75462/testReport)**
for PR 17487 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75465/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
**[Test build #75465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75465/testReport)**
for PR 17511 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
**[Test build #75465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75465/testReport)**
for PR 17511 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17511
[SPARK-20195][SPARKR][SQL] add createTable catalog API and deprecate
createExternalTable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Following up on #17483, add createTable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17483
merged to master. thanks for the review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
**[Test build #75464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75464/testReport)**
for PR 17510 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75461/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
**[Test build #75461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75461/testReport)**
for PR 17510 at commit
Github user samelamin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
FYI I can squash these commits to clean up the history once we agree on how
best to approach the testing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
**[Test build #75463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75463/testReport)**
for PR 17487 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Not related to this PR. It sounds like we have a bug in `HiveTableScans`.
The predicate orders matter. We should not prune the partitions if there exists
non-deterministic predicates that place
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
**[Test build #75462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75462/testReport)**
for PR 17487 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510#discussion_r109314055
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogUtils.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +126,37 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510#discussion_r109313930
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -436,6 +438,37 @@ abstract class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510#discussion_r109313904
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogUtils.scala
---
@@ -125,6 +126,37 @@ object
Github user samelamin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17487
Maybe @gatorsmile or @srowen have an idea. How can I test the case
insensitive unresolvedTableValuedFunction without using a var for the
functionName. I'm open to all ideas folks! introducing a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
**[Test build #75461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75461/testReport)**
for PR 17510 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17394#discussion_r109311325
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe.sql.out ---
@@ -1,205 +1,259 @@
-- Automatically generated by SQLQueryTestSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17510
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17481
I'm sorry I still don't understand the issue. In your example, you just
hit 'back' to go back from an unpaged view to paged. I think this should be
closed given feedback.
---
If your project is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17496
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
