Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
@viirya Thank you for a quick fix. The change looks good to me. I have a
question. Before the fix, we changed the output partitioning of relation's
child. But how come it was not reflected on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75926/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
**[Test build #75926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75926/testReport)**
for PR 17679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75927/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
**[Test build #75927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75927/testReport)**
for PR 17679 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75925/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #75925 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75925/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660
As we don't know the details of UDF, shall we skip UDF for
`canFilterOutNull` and directly return false?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112117272
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
@srowen, could you take a look please? I think this is a simplest temp fix
but might look a bit funny though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
@srowen, could you take a look please? I think this is a simplest temp fix
might look a bit funny though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660#discussion_r112117203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ case class EliminateOuterJoin(conf:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112116955
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,22 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
**[Test build #75929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75929/testReport)**
for PR 17669 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112115780
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,26 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112115405
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,22 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75928/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112114553
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,26 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112114110
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1003,6 +1009,8 @@ class SQLConf extends Serializable with Logging
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75924/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495
**[Test build #75924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75924/testReport)**
for PR 17495 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112111971
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,26 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112111734
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -1003,6 +1009,8 @@ class SQLConf extends Serializable with Logging
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112110655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596#discussion_r112110181
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -308,16 +305,17 @@ private[spark] object TaskMetrics extends Logging {
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16609
ok, are we closing this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
**[Test build #75927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75927/testReport)**
for PR 17679 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17640
@wangmiao1981 do you want to get this into 2.2?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112109737
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -421,6 +421,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112106597
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/group-by.sql ---
@@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ FROM testData;
-- Aggregate with foldable input and
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112109609
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisErrorSuite.scala
---
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ class AnalysisErrorSuite
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @dilipbiswal
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
**[Test build #75926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75926/testReport)**
for PR 17679 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
[SPARK-20356][SQL] Pruned InMemoryTableScanExec should have correct output
partitioning and ordering
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The output of
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
I think we want to bring GraphFrames to feature/performance parity with
GraphX - @mallman would love to understand the challenges you have run into.
Better yet, would be great to get some
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r112108440
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/PeriodicCheckpointer.scala ---
@@ -128,6 +128,16 @@ private[mllib] abstract class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r112108549
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/PeriodicRDDCheckpointer.scala ---
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r112108759
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -122,27 +125,39 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r112108958
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/util/PeriodicGraphCheckpointer.scala
---
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ private[mllib] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #75925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75925/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17678
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user yucai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17678
[SPARK-20381][SQL] Add SQL metrics of numOutputRows for ObjectHashAggâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ObjectHashAggregateExec is missing numOutputRows, add this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112107602
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17596
cc @mridulm any more comments on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
merged to master/2.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
thanks, merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r112106741
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/BaseSessionStateBuilder.scala
---
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r112106631
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -98,11 +98,12 @@ case class
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112106253
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112106499
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -942,6 +942,14 @@ setGeneric("countDistinct", function(x, ...) {
standardGeneric("countDistinct")
#' @export
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112105680
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r112106542
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CastSuite.scala
---
@@ -41,13 +41,17 @@ class CastSuite extends
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112106243
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112106399
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112106422
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r112106304
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
---
@@ -99,12 +99,9 @@ case class
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112106251
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17641#discussion_r112105799
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
---
@@ -99,12 +99,9 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660#discussion_r112105721
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/joins.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ case class EliminateOuterJoin(conf:
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112105361
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,43 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112105500
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1714,6 +1714,28 @@ test_that("group by, agg functions", {
expect_true(abs(sd(1:2) -
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112105477
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -918,6 +918,14 @@ setGeneric("cbrt", function(x) {
standardGeneric("cbrt") })
#' @export
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112105238
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,43 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112105346
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/group-by.sql ---
@@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ FROM testData;
-- Aggregate with foldable input and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112105286
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisErrorSuite.scala
---
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ class AnalysisErrorSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112105230
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -421,6 +421,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112105172
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112105086
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,26 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
Thanks @tgravescs for your reply.
> on the history server I would expect spark.acls.enable=false and
spark.history.ui.acls.enable=true, I can see where that could be confusing,
perhaps
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75922/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
@gatorsmile Could you check again? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75921/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75921/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17673
Thanks for sharing the work. To help make the review easier, I would
recommend:
1. Provide some background info.
Is the new algorithm better than the existing one and in which cases?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495
**[Test build #75924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75924/testReport)**
for PR 17495 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75920/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17677
**[Test build #75920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75920/testReport)**
for PR 17677 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112096685
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112096515
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112096284
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112095984
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112095876
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.deploy.yarn.security.ServiceCredentialProvider
---
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17495#discussion_r112095408
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtilSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75923/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #75923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75923/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #75923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75923/testReport)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75918/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
