Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617#discussion_r119275824
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -143,14 +144,18 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
**[Test build #77575 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77575/testReport)**
for PR 17113 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119275552
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1077,7 +1080,8 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617#discussion_r119275510
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -143,14 +144,18 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
*
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18151#discussion_r119275319
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVCSuite.scala ---
@@ -127,6 +127,14 @@ class LinearSVCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18151
**[Test build #77574 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77574/testReport)**
for PR 18151 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617#discussion_r119275374
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -143,14 +144,18 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77569/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18151#discussion_r119275003
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_classification.R ---
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ setClass("NaiveBayesModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
**[Test build #77569 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77569/testReport)**
for PR 17603 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77571/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153
**[Test build #77571 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77571/testReport)**
for PR 18153 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617#discussion_r119274153
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -143,14 +144,18 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
*
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617
LGTM, cc @cloud-fan @ueshin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77567/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617
**[Test build #77567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77567/testReport)**
for PR 17617 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147
LGTM except for @cloud-fan's comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18154
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18154
**[Test build #77572 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77572/testReport)**
for PR 18154 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18154
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77572/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119271935
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -37,11 +37,15 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// Exclude rules for 2.3.x
lazy val v23excludes = v22excludes
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18104
LGTM. Thanks @felixcheung for the update and @marmbrus for the ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119271662
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -441,12 +415,44 @@ private[ml] trait RandomForestParams extends
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119271607
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -420,18 +394,18 @@ private[ml] trait RandomForestParams extends
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119271552
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ private[ml] object TreeRegressorParams {
}
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153#discussion_r119271567
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -97,20 +97,30 @@ case class UnaryPositive(child:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119271262
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -533,13 +533,16 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) extends
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119271063
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressor.scala
---
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressor @Since("1.4.0")
Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118#discussion_r119270999
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -136,12 +136,20 @@ class GBTClassifier @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user pralabhkumar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
can any one of admin ,please review the pull request. It would be really
helpful. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18155
**[Test build #77573 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77573/testReport)**
for PR 18155 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18155
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119269498
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -569,7 +569,9 @@ primaryExpression
| '('
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119269209
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1077,7 +1080,8 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153#discussion_r119269154
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -97,20 +97,30 @@ case class UnaryPositive(child:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18152
**[Test build #77570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77570/testReport)**
for PR 18152 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18152
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18152
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77570/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119268299
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameHintSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18155
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
reverted, thanks for your understanding!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user 10110346 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18155
[SPARK-20876][SQL][Backport-2.2]If the input parameter is float type for
ceil or floor,the result is not we expected
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18154
**[Test build #77572 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77572/testReport)**
for PR 18154 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147#discussion_r119267756
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -191,6 +191,23 @@ def createGlobalTempView(self, name):
"""
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119267579
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119267472
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameHintSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18154
[SPARK-20932][ML]CountVectorizer support handle persistence
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
unpersist RDDs `input` & `wordCounts` after computation
## How was
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119266987
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/PlanParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -525,47 +525,117 @@ class PlanParserSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119266645
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/DSLHintSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119266605
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/DSLHintSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18086#discussion_r119266598
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/DSLHintSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147
cc @cloud-fan @ueshin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153
**[Test build #77571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77571/testReport)**
for PR 18153 at commit
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18153
[SPARK-20931][SQL] ABS function support string type.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ABS function support string type. Hive/MySQL support this feature.
Ref:
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119265202
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1077,7 +1080,8 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119265297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -569,7 +569,9 @@ primaryExpression
| '('
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17936
Hi @rxin, would you mind take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77568/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
**[Test build #77568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77568/testReport)**
for PR 17995 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
@cloud-fan Ok. No problem for me. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Hi @viirya , as this PR already missed the Spark 2.2 release, I'd like to
revert it and re-merge it at the end of Spark 2.3, so that future analyzer
related PRs won't get conflicted when
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
LGTM, merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18104
ok passes. @shivaram what do you think about this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user facaiy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18139#discussion_r119263608
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -187,8 +187,11 @@ def needConversion(self):
def toInternal(self, dt):
if dt is not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18152
**[Test build #77570 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77570/testReport)**
for PR 18152 at commit
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17998
#18064 is merged. Since it changes relative classes and code paths a lot.
And seems an alternative approach for showing the metrics of writing data out
is better. I'd close this and create a new PR
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18152
[SPARK-20930][ML] Destroy broadcasted centers after computing cost in
KMeans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Destroy broadcasted centers after computing cost
##
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17540
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18041
@srowen , this issue existed when reading from metrics.properties conf
file, I think we should fix this part. As for SparkConf part, I don't think it
is necessary to fix.
---
If your project is
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119261589
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2616,4 +2617,66 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r119261484
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -461,68 +462,269 @@ case class
Github user facaiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18120
Thanks, @BryanCutler.
It seems that #17849 copys `Params` from `Estimator` to `Model`
automatically, which is pretty useful. However, `getter` method is still
missing and need to be added
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
**[Test build #77569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77569/testReport)**
for PR 17603 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17603
@squito
Thank you so much :-) :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
Sorry, I will close it for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jinxing64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17312
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17634
@squito
Thanks a lot for merging :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113#discussion_r119260232
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{AccumulatorV2,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77562/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18064
**[Test build #77562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77562/testReport)**
for PR 18064 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17995
**[Test build #77568 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77568/testReport)**
for PR 17995 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
ping @MLnick Can you help reviewing this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77563/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77564/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18147
**[Test build #77563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77563/testReport)**
for PR 18147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
**[Test build #77564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77564/testReport)**
for PR 18075 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17617
**[Test build #77567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77567/testReport)**
for PR 17617 at commit
1 - 100 of 500 matches
Mail list logo
