Github user mauropalsgraaf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
Sorry for my absence, will look into it now
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user mauropalsgraaf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807#discussion_r206142897
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -68,9 +68,18 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user mauropalsgraaf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
@hvanhovell Do you know what this unknown error code, -9 means?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user mauropalsgraaf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807#discussion_r206322253
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -68,9 +68,18 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user mauropalsgraaf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
I've added a test case and now it works properly for the given example in
the description. Regarding the comment: "make sure eval is only called once",
is this wha
GitHub user mauropalsgraaf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
[SPARK-24536] Validate that limit clause cannot have a nullable expression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It proposes a version in which nullable expressions
