Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64526546
[Test build #23884 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23884/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64536426
[Test build #23884 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23884/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64671123
@brkyvz Thanks! I've merged this into master. Will submit another PR for
branch-1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468
[SPARK-4614][MLLIB] Slight API changes in Matrix and Matrices
Before we have a full picture of the operators we want to add, it might be
safer to hide `Matrix.transposeMultiply` in 1.2.0. Another
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64510830
[Test build #23870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23870/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#discussion_r20916331
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/MatricesSuite.scala ---
@@ -112,4 +116,50 @@ class MatricesSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64515054
Looks good to me! Just made one comment, no biggie though, it's fine as is
(but if you decide to change it, there are 4 exact copies of it).
One comment/question about
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64515619
[Test build #23870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23870/consoleFull)
for PR 3468 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64515623
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#discussion_r20920325
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/MatricesSuite.scala ---
@@ -112,4 +116,50 @@ class MatricesSuite extends FunSuite {
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3468#issuecomment-64526447
@brkyvz `XORShiftRandom` implements `Random`. So users can use it directly.
Using seed will create problems when we want to generate a sequence of
matrices, e.g.,
12 matches
Mail list logo
