Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113414210
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113414080
@squito, can you help me to review the test again. 3ks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113414174
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113415556
[Test build #35247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35247/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113418472
[Test build #35248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35248/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113437368
[Test build #35247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35247/console)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113437398
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113438626
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113438608
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113416966
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113417006
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113432930
[Test build #35251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35251/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32811839
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerMaster(conf:
SparkConf)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113438818
[Test build #35248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35248/console)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113438854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113438222
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113439039
[Test build #35255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35255/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113432541
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113432599
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32811940
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1193,8 +1193,10 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// TODO: This will
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113169097
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113169123
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113166545
@andrewor14 @srowen Already refine with the comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113166266
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113166319
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113166827
[Test build #35133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35133/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113169866
[Test build #35134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35134/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113167204
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113167200
[Test build #35133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35133/console)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113191005
[Test build #35134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35134/console)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113191053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32799824
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113356815
@andrewor14 The rest failed, because I change the
`DagScheduler.executorLost` logical
DAGSCheduler.scala:
Origin version: Change mapOutPutTracker epoch
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32800016
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113284343
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113284614
[Test build #35169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35169/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113285019
I think its actually a real test failure -- ignore late map task
completions in DAGSchedulerSuite was failing for me when run locally as well.
---
If your project is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113283506
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32778875
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113284364
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32778983
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32781070
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32781253
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -598,6 +598,49 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113297759
Hi @suyanNone I'm still trying to understand this. Your high-level
description of the problem makes sense, but I'm confused by the test case. I
put in a few comments,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113300261
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-113300218
[Test build #35169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35169/console)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r32600352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-93883077
@andrewor14 that problem occurs while have stage-retry.
Our user had been meet that problem under having a Executor Lost because of
killed by yarn or sth, while we
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-93013150
Hi @suyanNone do you have a small example application code that reproduces
the hanging issue? @kayousterhout @markhamstra it would be good if you could
take a look at
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r28356812
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -543,6 +543,53 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends FunSuiteLike
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r28356730
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -543,6 +543,53 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends FunSuiteLike
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-93014371
Hi @suyanNone do you have a small example application code that reproduces
the hanging issue? @kayousterhout @markhamstra it would be good if you could
take a look at
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r28356278
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -543,6 +543,53 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends FunSuiteLike
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-83422662
This patch is forgotten by us...
@srowen @markhamstra @kayousterhout
this patch can prevent from endless retry which may occurs after a
executor is killed or
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-77404911
@markhamstra do you have any thoughts on this one? would love to get
another set of eyes on this for a yea or nay. I don't feel like I know this
code well enough.
---
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76916713
@cloud-fan yeah I hear you although this method is defined in the
superclass, not just made up for this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76870332
I'm still a little against the `canEqual` method. In this particular
context, I think (stageId, partitionId) is meaningful enough to identify a
task.
---
If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76462511
cc @markhamstra and @kayousterhout also
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76464316
I'll take a look over the weekend.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76362137
[Test build #28061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28061/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76375414
[Test build #28061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28061/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76375421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76378618
@cloud-fan @rxin do you have any final thoughts on this? it's looking
reasonable to me though I admit I don't know this scheduler code well enough to
be confident.
---
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25414968
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25416698
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
// a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76321748
[Test build #28038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28038/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76326132
[Test build #28038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28038/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-76326137
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25333545
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25333773
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
// a
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r24806228
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
// a
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-74646530
@srowen @JoshRosen can some one verify this patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r24806252
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r24806282
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72167520
[Test build #26386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26386/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72167526
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71993494
[Test build #26307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26307/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71993235
[Test build #26307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26307/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71993498
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72147882
jenkins retests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72148555
[Test build #26374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26374/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72148352
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72150515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72150509
[Test build #26373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26373/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72150939
[Test build #26374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26374/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72150943
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72148180
[Test build #26373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26373/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72148232
@cloud-fan--!
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala:69:
class ResultTask
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72162266
[Test build #26386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26386/consoleFull)
for PR 4055 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r23827693
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-72163353
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r23592779
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r23592724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -106,7 +106,21 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](val stageId:
Int, var
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71458822
Last week and current week, my work is not in Spark, so reply was slower
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71457733
@cloud-fan
According current code, it may not easy to change to not re-submit task in
pendingTasks. To be honest, current DAGScheduler is complicated but at some
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71460355
@suyanNone Thanks for the explanation of re-submit!
What's the Chinese name of HarryZhang? We don't use English name in the
labâ¦â¦
---
If your project is set
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71458406
@cloud-fan btw, Do you know HarryZhang?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r23589337
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -65,4 +65,6 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
override def
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#issuecomment-71579227
@cloud-fan ZhangLei, SunHongLiang, HanLi, ChenXingYu, blabla...I am
ZhangLei's classmate in ZJU.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r23589410
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +540,52 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
