---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34976/#review87679
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [34976]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34976/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 6:23 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Dave Lester.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34976/#review87686
---
LGTM, but I'd still like to see a Mac user review the Mac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35179/#review87699
---
Looks like Cody already made path::join() variadic in commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34720/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 2:48 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Bartek Plotka,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34720/#review87767
---
src/slave/slave.hpp
On April 20, 2015, 5:55 a.m., Adam B wrote:
LGTM, barring a question about ordering/synchronization. I'll let another
committer take a look before we commit it.
Adam B wrote:
Would also like to see a successful ReviewBot pass. That MasterFailover
segfault seems like it could be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35405/
---
Review request for mesos and Niklas Nielsen.
Repository: mesos
Description
On June 12, 2015, 6:43 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
src/slave/slave.cpp, lines 4383-4400
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34720/diff/4/?file=983235#file983235line4383
First of all, we don't need to check if 'executor' is NULL or not here.
If you looked at the callers, it's guaranteed that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14960/#review87773
---
Hi Du!
I am sorry this ended up being a stale reviewl: If you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14460/#review87772
---
Hi Damien,
I am sorry that this ended up being a stale review: do
On June 12, 2015, 6:21 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Are (1) and (2) independent changes?
Any performance implications from (1)? A benchmark for 'synchronized' would
be great!
Are (1) and (2) independent changes?
Yeah, they're more or less independent.
Any performance implications from
On June 12, 2015, 10 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 875
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34719/diff/4/?file=983929#file983929line875
REASON_EXECUTOR_PREEMPTED ?
cc @vinod @bmahler
SGTM.
- Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35404/
---
Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
Bugs: MESOS-2519
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35164/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 8:39 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu, Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34068/#review87743
---
Ship it!
Minor style issue, I'll clean it up for you and get this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33793/#review87745
---
Ship it!
Just some minor style items, I'll clean them up and get
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35157/#review87755
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jie Yu
On June 12, 2015, 8:40 p.m., Bartek
framework 20150612-182649-1787367596-40122-13591-
18:26:49 DEBUG: I0612 18:26:49.245582 13610 sched.cpp:448] Framework registered
with 20150612-182649-1787367596-40122-13591-
18:26:49 DEBUG: I0612 18:26:49.245728 13609 master.cpp:4108] Sending 1 offers
to framework 20150612-182649-1787367596
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35179/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 7:04 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Cody
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35157/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 8:40 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34721/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 3:37 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Bartek Plotka,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34721/#review87784
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [35079, 34631, 34632, 34633,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14460/#review87786
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [14460]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14309/#review87791
---
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [14309]
Failed command:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35404/#review87795
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [35403, 35404]
All tests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35411/
---
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone.
Bugs: MESOS-2866
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35410/
---
Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone.
Repository: mesos
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35404/#review87781
---
Ship it!
Have you tested this?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35403/#review87780
---
3rdparty/libprocess/src/socket.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35405/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 11:08 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Niklas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35403/#review87779
---
Maybe add @joris to this review?
- Niklas Nielsen
On June 12,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14960/#review87790
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [14960]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35179/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 5:17 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and Cody
On June 12, 2015, 11:15 a.m., Adam B wrote:
Looks like Cody already made path::join() variadic in commit
b08fccf8f5ea325b8c38055b5f2c03509744dd9b Switched path::join() to be
variadic. How is your patch an improvement? What problem is it solving?
Please remove the Might have some
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35395/
---
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Joris Van Remoortere.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29406/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 6:06 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29406/#review87735
---
Are the changes to process.cpp, libevent.{hpp|cpp} independent?
On June 12, 2015, 6:17 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Are the changes to process.cpp, libevent.{hpp|cpp} independent? Hard to
tell if these are related to SSL, can you pull them out into separate
reviews?
Ben: I've been reviewing this closely with Joris and asked him to keep these in
the
On June 12, 2015, 6:17 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
Are the changes to process.cpp, libevent.{hpp|cpp} independent? Hard to
tell if these are related to SSL, can you pull them out into separate
reviews?
Benjamin Hindman wrote:
Ben: I've been reviewing this closely with Joris and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35395/#review87737
---
Are (1) and (2) independent changes?
Any performance implications
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35395/
---
(Updated June 12, 2015, 6:24 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman
42 matches
Mail list logo