Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116251762
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116251692
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116251880
[Test build #35935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35935/consoleFull)
for PR 7069 at commit
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#discussion_r33421311
--- Diff:
repl/scala-2.11/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/repl/SparkILoop.scala ---
@@ -1,88 +1,64 @@
-/* NSC -- new Scala compiler
- * Copyright
Github user dragos commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#discussion_r33421316
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1227,6 +1222,7 @@
encodingUTF-8/encoding
maxmem1024m/maxmem
forktrue/fork
+
Github user SaintBacchus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#discussion_r33421898
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -334,6 +334,16 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116272214
[Test build #35937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35937/consoleFull)
for PR 7069 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-116272283
[Test build #35936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35936/consoleFull)
for PR 6903 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-116240820
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-116240665
[Test build #35926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35926/console)
for PR 6444 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7065#issuecomment-116241394
[Test build #35929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35929/console)
for PR 7065 at commit
GitHub user SaintBacchus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069
[SPARK-8688][YARN]Bug fix: disable the cache fs to gain the HDFS connection.
If `fs.hdfs.impl.disable.cache` was `false`(default), `FileSystem` will use
the cached `DFSClient` which use old
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7067#issuecomment-116253498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-116253536
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7067#issuecomment-116253494
[Test build #35932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35932/console)
for PR 7067 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-116253531
[Test build #35933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35933/console)
for PR 7034 at commit
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7059
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user piaozhexiu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116243679
@marmbrus I got all the unit tests passing now. Can you please review my
patch? This is no longer WIP.
I incorporated all your suggestions. A couple of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7070#issuecomment-116253471
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-116258000
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116262691
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7059#issuecomment-116268772
closing in favor of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6903#issuecomment-116271284
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116271285
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116271563
LGTM.
For data source API, I understand we need an efficient `buildScan` that
return `RDD[InternalRow]` as `RDD[Row]`. But I'm still feel we should make
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116271238
[Test build #35935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35935/console)
for PR 7069 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7069#issuecomment-116271265
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7030#discussion_r33419288
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLEnv.scala
---
@@ -38,9 +38,11 @@ private[hive] object
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7030#issuecomment-116205783
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206108
(That test failure is my fault; already hotfixed)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206133
[Test build #969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/969/consoleFull)
for PR 7003 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206173
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206176
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116206123
[Test build #35918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35918/consoleFull)
for PR 7031 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116207504
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116206924
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116207547
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116207971
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116207973
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116208416
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116208411
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-116208417
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-116208443
[Test build #35926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35926/consoleFull)
for PR 6444 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#issuecomment-116208412
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116208419
[Test build #35925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35925/consoleFull)
for PR 7031 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116208897
Looks like that didn't help:
```
Build step 'Publish JUnit test result report' changed build result to
UNSTABLE
Finished: UNSTABLE
```
---
If
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r33420090
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -1047,6 +1047,22 @@ object functions {
def floor(columnName: String):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116218969
[Test build #35927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35927/console)
for PR 7031 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116219009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6992#discussion_r33420166
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
@@ -466,7 +557,8 @@ def predictOnValues(self, dstream):
def _test():
import doctest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116223882
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7063#issuecomment-116223325
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7065
[SPARK-8664] [ML] Add PCA transformer
Add PCA transformer for ML pipeline
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yanboliang/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7065#issuecomment-116224957
[Test build #35929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35929/consoleFull)
for PR 7065 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-116224970
[Test build #35930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35930/console)
for PR 4229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-116224973
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116224980
[Test build #970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/970/console)
for PR 7003 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116224993
[Test build #35922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35922/console)
for PR 6959 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7066#issuecomment-116226786
[Test build #35931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35931/consoleFull)
for PR 7066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7068#issuecomment-116228309
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-116228316
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-116228336
[Test build #35933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35933/consoleFull)
for PR 7034 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7034#issuecomment-116228313
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -383,20 +386,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420649
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -404,9 +401,10 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420652
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -562,4 +560,5 @@ private[parquet] object
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420661
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -212,10 +212,7 @@ private[parquet] class RowWriteSupport
Github user rtreffer commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420742
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -383,20 +386,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7063#issuecomment-116205754
This failure was due to a bug in dev/run-test.py and it's been already
resolved.
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116206067
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116206063
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7061#issuecomment-116206053
Alright, I'm going to merge this now. I'll backport to branch-1.4 later if
it turns out to be necessary for backporting regression tests.
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116206065
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116206054
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206068
[Test build #35916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35916/console)
for PR 7003 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116206084
[Test build #35919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35919/consoleFull)
for PR 6959 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116206104
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7061
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116206668
[Test build #35922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35922/consoleFull)
for PR 6959 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#discussion_r33419372
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -48,7 +38,15 @@
* primitive types, such as long,
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#discussion_r33419369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -171,8 +122,64 @@ private void setNotNullAt(int i) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116207939
[Test build #35923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35923/consoleFull)
for PR 7031 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116208281
[Test build #35923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35923/console)
for PR 7031 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7036#issuecomment-116208664
The JIRA says local, HDFS, S3. Yes you can repro easily with something like
`sc.binaryFiles(/Users/srowen/Library/Caches/Metadata/Safari/History/).count()`
vs adding a
Github user aloknsingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7064#discussion_r33419658
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDASuite.scala ---
@@ -232,12 +238,20 @@ private[clustering] object LDASuite {
}
Github user aloknsingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7064#discussion_r33419654
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -119,6 +119,18 @@ final class EMLDAOptimizer extends
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7031#issuecomment-116213031
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r33420012
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -287,6 +286,88 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right:
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r3342
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -287,6 +286,88 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right:
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r33420126
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -287,6 +286,88 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression,
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7054#issuecomment-116220075
Sure, we can fix this up. In general with the hadoop-provided builds we
expect people to use those from now on. Also, this definitely worked for me
locally, so I
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r33420117
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -287,6 +286,88 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right:
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6976#discussion_r33420109
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -287,6 +286,88 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right:
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6856#issuecomment-116222651
@jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7063#issuecomment-116223233
[Test build #35917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35917/console)
for PR 7063 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116224994
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420609
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -169,11 +169,12 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33420628
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -373,8 +374,10 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7003#issuecomment-116229585
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
