Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122031079
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122031100
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7437#issuecomment-122031320
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user brennonyork commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7401#issuecomment-122031700
Its worthwhile to note as well that this patch will consume and resolve
[SPARK-6557](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6557) as well.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-122033190
[Test build #37513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37513/console)
for PR 7342 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-122033321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6294#issuecomment-122033912
@zsxwing Could you post a bit more detail on the offline discussion please?
The last update from @tdas suggests that this is no longer required - so some
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7129#issuecomment-122034355
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7129#issuecomment-122034334
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7431#issuecomment-122034172
I can try it out (I'll also add some logging in my internal build to make
sure the code is actually being exercised).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7129#issuecomment-122034624
[Test build #37525 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37525/consoleFull)
for PR 7129 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122034576
Jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122035324
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122035363
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7028#issuecomment-122035252
lgtm ! thanks for exploring all these options, I like this solution, huge
improvement over the current behavior
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user josepablocam commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7430#issuecomment-122035440
@MechCoder I'm not as familiar with Python, so this might be a horrid
suggestion, but one option would be to require users to pass in a named
function, rather than
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122035423
[Test build #27 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/27/consoleFull)
for PR 7438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122035558
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122035574
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7448#issuecomment-122035925
What happens if my accumulator update is huge? Could this lead to dropped
heartbeats?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7448#issuecomment-122035997
Ah, I see now that it's only for specific accumulators and is internal-only.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#discussion_r34817673
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ def _do_init(self, master, appName, sparkHome,
pyFiles, environment, batchSize,
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#issuecomment-122036240
LGTM since I can't think of a better solution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7291#issuecomment-122036264
[Test build #37517 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37517/console)
for PR 7291 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7438#discussion_r34817168
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ private[spark] class Client(
val appId =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-122036492
[Test build #37516 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37516/console)
for PR 7342 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7291#issuecomment-122036367
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7430#issuecomment-122036351
Hmm. I did try that out, but there was some problem with python to java
conversion. I'll have a deeper look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-122036596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7342#issuecomment-122036783
@yhuai, Thanks for the step by step guide, really appreciate it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jendap commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7375#issuecomment-122036687
thanks @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6750#issuecomment-122113535
I had one last idea for how to simplify this:
https://github.com/squito/spark/pull/4, that I made sure doesn't break any
tests this time! Let me know what your
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7107#issuecomment-122115691
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7266#issuecomment-122115515
[Test build #37544 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37544/consoleFull)
for PR 7266 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#discussion_r34844383
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Window.scala ---
@@ -38,443 +84,661 @@ case class Window(
child: SparkPlan)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#issuecomment-122119926
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#issuecomment-122119941
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6906#issuecomment-122122403
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6444#discussion_r34847593
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillWriter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#discussion_r34847515
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/WindowSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7454#issuecomment-122132823
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7454#issuecomment-122132814
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#issuecomment-122132788
[Test build #37545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37545/console)
for PR 7057 at commit
GitHub user feynmanliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7454
[MLlib]OnlineLDA Performance Improvements
Use range-slicing (coalesced memory access), in-place updates, and reduce
number of transposes in OnlineLDA implementation.
You can merge this pull
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7444#discussion_r34852485
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -268,6 +268,14 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sqlContext:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7450#issuecomment-122135446
[Test build #1093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1093/consoleFull)
for PR 7450 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#discussion_r34852986
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -552,6 +552,34 @@ case class
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#discussion_r34852996
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -552,6 +552,34 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7453#issuecomment-122136644
[Test build #1094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1094/consoleFull)
for PR 7453 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7455#issuecomment-122138153
[Test build #37552 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37552/console)
for PR 7455 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7454#issuecomment-122138072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7455#issuecomment-122138171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7446#issuecomment-122039631
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7448#issuecomment-122041450
[Test build #37510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37510/console)
for PR 7448 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7394#issuecomment-122051215
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7394#issuecomment-122051236
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7401#issuecomment-122055838
**[Test build #37532 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37532/console)**
for PR 7401 at commit
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7381#discussion_r34830515
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RModelFormula.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7452#issuecomment-122069909
cc @marmbrus @chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7452#discussion_r34830499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/BooleanSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -40,29 +40,11 @@ class
Github user ericl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7381#issuecomment-122069902
Sounds good, I'll look at the R integration next.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-122070057
Seems unrelated random hang. Trying to run this again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-122070083
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7372#issuecomment-122070564
Alright agreed, should leave it to the future expression init stuff,
closing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7372
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7129#issuecomment-122074664
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7268#issuecomment-122078428
[Test build #37530 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37530/console)
for PR 7268 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7268#issuecomment-122078479
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7191#issuecomment-122086350
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7191#issuecomment-122086465
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121848726
@viirya,
1. Why pass the lower bound and upper bound in a vector instead of pass
separately? They are passed separately in Scala API. and A vector can not hold
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34758993
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34758673
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -86,4 +88,198 @@ class DateTimeUtilsSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121842704
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121842697
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7115#issuecomment-121844421
@HuJiayin you need to rebase the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844520
[Test build #37463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37463/console)
for PR 7356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7343#issuecomment-121846486
LGTM. I am merging it to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-121846456
LGTM, just some minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34759205
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759850
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759808
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ case class UnresolvedFunction(name: String,
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7434#discussion_r34759860
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -277,15 +276,21 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121843409
[Test build #37461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37461/console)
for PR 7418 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121843303
[Test build #37463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37463/consoleFull)
for PR 7356 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121843429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6112#issuecomment-121849815
@GeorgeDittmar I will try to fix it and send you a PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#discussion_r34759686
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -184,6 +199,82 @@ class LocalLDAModel private[clustering] (
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7294#issuecomment-121842954
@jkbradley I made one pass:
1. Some of my comments also apply to the old implementation. So I don't
think it is necessary to address them in this PR.
2. It
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846610
[Test build #37464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37464/consoleFull)
for PR 7418 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7343
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#discussion_r34758587
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -872,6 +872,25 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// will be posted, which
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356#issuecomment-121844789
Thanks @viirya -- LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#discussion_r34759109
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -180,4 +182,202 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846213
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7418#issuecomment-121846231
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7356
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7417#issuecomment-121858683
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
