Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11064#issuecomment-179734325
**[Test build #2515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2515/consoleFull)**
for PR 11064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-179741773
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-179741404
**[Test build #50746 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50746/consoleFull)**
for PR 11071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-179741770
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-179748524
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-179748519
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-179748356
**[Test build #50747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50747/consoleFull)**
for PR 11047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-179747960
**[Test build #50742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50742/consoleFull)**
for PR 11065 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11066#discussion_r51849272
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -134,7 +134,18 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#discussion_r51851087
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +56,19 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
//
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#discussion_r51851099
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +56,19 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
//
Github user mariobriggs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11022#issuecomment-179769040
welcome @zsxwing
Could I get my name assigned to the JIRA (as a mark of contribution)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user skyluc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-179741301
@andrewor14 yes, dynamic allocation works fine, but
`spark.dynamicAllocation.initialExecutors` is not used at start-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-179791480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#discussion_r51852765
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +56,19 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
//
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#discussion_r51853631
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +56,19 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-179790970
**[Test build #50747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50747/consoleFull)**
for PR 11047 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-179791483
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11060#discussion_r51861250
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoalescedRDD.scala ---
@@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ private class PartitionCoalescer(maxPartitions: Int,
prev:
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11066#issuecomment-179743176
Do you have suggestion on which class to put the common code in ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180047050
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180055713
**[Test build #50771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50771/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180055727
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180055720
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180066626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11084#issuecomment-180102080
**[Test build #50782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50782/consoleFull)**
for PR 11084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#issuecomment-180047876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180047840
retest this please. The master has been fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180051489
**[Test build #50770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50770/consoleFull)**
for PR 10993 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11059#issuecomment-180052303
sounds like a good rule
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#issuecomment-180062121
cc @davies for a more detailed review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180064615
```
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala:
new ArrayBuffer[(String, String)] with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11072#issuecomment-180066029
**[Test build #50774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50774/consoleFull)**
for PR 11072 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180074860
**[Test build #50776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50776/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180076930
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180087833
**[Test build #50778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50778/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180095881
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51953075
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51953151
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51953115
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51953109
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180099140
**[Test build #50780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50780/consoleFull)**
for PR 11034 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180099089
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180099091
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#issuecomment-180057465
@steveloughran given the discussion on the bug, can you remove shading for
anything but Jackson?
In particular, shading the javax annotations is wrong because
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180063316
can you add one for `SynchronizedMap` as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11083
[SPARK-13136][SQL] Create a dedicated Broadcast exchange operator [WIP]
Quite a few Spark SQL join operators broadcast one side of the join to all
nodes. The are a few problems with this:
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-180065661
For join with single Long key:
```
val dim = broadcast(sqlContext.range(1 << 16).selectExpr("id as k",
"cast(id as string) as v"))
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180095564
**[Test build #50779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50779/consoleFull)**
for PR 11034 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11084
[SPARK-13205] [SQL] SQL Generation Support for Self Join
This PR addresses two issues:
- Self join does not work in SQL Generation
- When creating new instances for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11072#issuecomment-180097997
**[Test build #50774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50774/consoleFull)**
for PR 11072 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180098858
**[Test build #50772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50772/consoleFull)**
for PR 10959 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180101869
I think there's some overlap between this patch and #11067
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180104115
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#issuecomment-180047872
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-180075423
For join with two ints
```
val dim2 = broadcast(sqlContext.range(1 << 16)
.selectExpr("cast(id as int) as k1", "cast(id as int) as k2",
"cast(id
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180084459
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#discussion_r51952950
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +345,14 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
defaultValue =
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180100978
**[Test build #50781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50781/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11059#issuecomment-180046937
Should scalastyle rule be added to ban use of mutable.SynchronizedBuffer ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180053049
Actually the tests passed but not for the latest commit. Let's re-run this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180052654
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180063800
```
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaStreamSuite.scala:
val result = new mutable.HashMap[String, Long]() with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180076934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-180083649
**[Test build #50777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50777/consoleFull)**
for PR 11065 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#discussion_r51954890
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -408,6 +453,210 @@ private[joins] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180047515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180047504
**[Test build #50767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50767/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180047513
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#issuecomment-180047567
**[Test build #50761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50761/consoleFull)**
for PR 11055 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51938390
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180054865
**[Test build #50771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50771/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#issuecomment-180060049
**[Test build #50772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50772/consoleFull)**
for PR 10959 at commit
GitHub user ted-yu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082
Add scalastyle rule banning use of mutable.SynchronizedBuffer
See discussion at the tail of #11059
@andrewor14
Please review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180074493
Logged SPARK-13204 for replacing mutable.SynchronizedMap
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#discussion_r51950606
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnVectorUtils.java
---
@@ -100,6 +101,9 @@ private static void
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180088967
**[Test build #50770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50770/consoleFull)**
for PR 10993 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180089190
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sureshthalamati commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11063#discussion_r51951404
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -213,14 +212,21 @@ class DataFrameReader
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180089197
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11072#issuecomment-180098284
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11072#issuecomment-180098283
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075#issuecomment-180101430
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r51939570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/QueryExecution.scala ---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ class QueryExecution(val sqlContext: SQLContext,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180075187
**[Test build #50776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50776/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180075200
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180075198
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#issuecomment-180076144
@nongli Posted the generated code, also add a benchmark for join with 2 int
keys
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180076446
**[Test build #50764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50764/consoleFull)**
for PR 10993 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11083#issuecomment-180094595
**[Test build #50775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50775/consoleFull)**
for PR 11083 at commit
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11065#discussion_r51954518
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -408,6 +453,210 @@ private[joins] object
Github user mgummelt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180103124
Looks like it failed a network test. Flaky test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r51956317
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180062533
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180066287
**[Test build #50773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50773/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180072504
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11083#issuecomment-180072462
**[Test build #50775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50775/consoleFull)**
for PR 11083 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11063#discussion_r51951455
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -213,14 +212,21 @@ class DataFrameReader
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11083#issuecomment-180094758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11083#issuecomment-180094756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
