GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
[SPARK-17751] [SQL] [Backport-2.0] Remove spark.sql.eagerAnalysis and
Output the Plan if Existed in AnalysisException
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to backp
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
As I say on the JIRA, if I understand this correctly, this turns O(n)
operations into O(n^2) etc. I don't think that actually helps anything.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83792860
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ColumnPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ class ColumnPruningSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
cc @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83792912
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -536,14 +536,14 @@ class FilterPushdownSu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
**[Test build #67115 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67115/consoleFull)**
for PR 15529 at commit
[`ebc6f73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83793000
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FilterPushdownSuite.scala
---
@@ -1016,6 +1016,8 @@ class FilterPushdownSu
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83793204
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/OptimizeCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ class OptimizeCodegenSu
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@sethah agree with that yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417#discussion_r83793396
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveDDLCommandSuite.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ class HiveDDLCommandSuite extends PlanTest {
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@yinxusen for cutting lineage do you intend to check whether the
`initialModel` itself has an `initialModel`, and if so clear it?
I think that can be a reasonable solution if we have a clean
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15417
@gatorsmile I've update the PR description and left some comments on
changed codes, please comment if there were anything that still unclear. Thank
you!
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
I think this is OK. The general issue is whether it will be compatible with
other transitive dependencies, but I believe it would remain so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
**[Test build #67111 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67111/consoleFull)**
for PR 15525 at commit
[`f318dff`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67111/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15525
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775#discussion_r83796409
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFileFormat.scala ---
@@ -118,6 +120,11 @@ class OrcFileFormat extends FileFormat with
Data
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775#discussion_r83796484
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/orc/VectorizedSparkOrcNewRecordReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520
**[Test build #67112 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67112/consoleFull)**
for PR 15520 at commit
[`6aa9e2f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67112/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
Merging this to master and branch 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user fidato13 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
@srowen @rxin @zsxwing Can you please have a look and advise.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
**[Test build #67116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67116/consoleFull)**
for PR 15480 at commit
[`1ae9935`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15528
**[Test build #67114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67114/consoleFull)**
for PR 15528 at commit
[`5994f07`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15528
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67114/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15528
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
[SPARK-17731][SQL][STREAMING][FOLLOWUP] Refactored StreamingQueryListener
APIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As per @rxin request, here are further API changes
- Cha
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
**[Test build #67117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67117/consoleFull)**
for PR 15530 at commit
[`08a75ea`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r83803058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -118,7 +118,45 @@ object GenerateOrderi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67117/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
**[Test build #67117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67117/consoleFull)**
for PR 15530 at commit
[`08a75ea`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
[SQL][STREAMING][TEST] Remove Option.contains for Scala 2.10 compatibility
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala 2.10 does not have Option.contains, which broke Scala 2.10
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
I will merge this as soon as compilation passes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
**[Test build #67119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67119/consoleFull)**
for PR 15530 at commit
[`c263914`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
**[Test build #67118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67118/consoleFull)**
for PR 15531 at commit
[`cd54a4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15490
@ajbozarth I'm not a spark committer, I'm not capaclbe of getting stuff in.
I did dd one comment to some of the code, otherwise nothing I have issues with.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up
Github user DanielMe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
@yhuai thanks! My impression was that `get_json_object` does not convert
json arrays to `ArrayType`s, maybe I misunderstood the way it's supposed to be
used though.
---
If your project is set up
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
Ha we have been bit by this like 3 times in the past month.
Time to begin agitating to remove 2.10 support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
We should ping the dev list for something like this.
For now, I am merging this fix. Compilation has passed in 2.11 in Jenkins,
and I locally compiled and tested in 2.10.
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67115/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
**[Test build #67115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67115/consoleFull)**
for PR 15529 at commit
[`ebc6f73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15529
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
Agree that env variables are not a great way to do anything, but that ship
has sailed. I don't think we'd remove the 10 that are already here, and if this
changed, would be a total rewrite. For that
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83812701
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1448,14 +1452,70 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83811366
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1448,14 +1452,70 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83811950
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1448,14 +1452,70 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83811589
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1448,14 +1452,70 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83812257
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,65 +276,108 @@ class UtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ResetSystemPropertie
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83813908
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,65 +276,108 @@ class UtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ResetSystemPropertie
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15285#discussion_r83811382
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1448,14 +1452,70 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
CallSite(short
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r83814390
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -50,22 +54,27 @@ abstract class RDG extends Le
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r83814907
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -77,18 +86,28 @@ case class Rand(seed: Long) e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
@rxin @marmbrus Please take a look at the API changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432#discussion_r83817947
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/randomExpressions.scala
---
@@ -50,22 +54,27 @@ abstract class RDG exten
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`e1283a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15514
Awesome, thanks for taking this on @jagadeesanas2, this looks pretty
reasonable although it might be helpful if we mentioned briefly the PR
description what the Py4J changes were in this release sin
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
The previous test failure was because we replace the analyzed plan with
`withCacheData`, while cache manager uses the original analyzed plan as keys.
Force-pushed a new and much simpler ap
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15319#discussion_r83820944
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -74,14 +74,26 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15450
@sethah I should say I am not trying to handle cases where clusters start
separate and converge to nearly the same point. I don't that's something we
should even try to do.
To elaborate, he
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557#discussion_r83822272
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
from pyspark import since, keyword_only
from pyspark.ml.util import *
-fr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #67121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67121/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`436ff00`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557#discussion_r83822305
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -201,7 +203,74 @@ def computeCost(self, dataset):
"""
return self._call_java("compu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
**[Test build #67116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67116/consoleFull)**
for PR 15480 at commit
[`1ae9935`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67116/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
**[Test build #3360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3360/consoleFull)**
for PR 15436 at commit
[`f49f6a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382#discussion_r83823942
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Ca
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
**[Test build #67121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67121/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
[`436ff00`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67121/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
**[Test build #67118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67118/consoleFull)**
for PR 15531 at commit
[`cd54a4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67118/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
**[Test build #67122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67122/consoleFull)**
for PR 15508 at commit
[`59b805e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
**[Test build #67119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67119/consoleFull)**
for PR 15530 at commit
[`c263914`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15530
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67119/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Thanks @jerryshao @srowen . I've updated the code like what you suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67124/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`b745394`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
**[Test build #67123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67123/consoleFull)**
for PR 15508 at commit
[`2f5664b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user lins05 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15487
@HyukjinKwon I've updated the usage string. Now it looks like this:
```
spark-sql> describe function first;
Function: first
Class: org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.Fi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15487
**[Test build #67125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67125/consoleFull)**
for PR 15487 at commit
[`4c3f043`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`e1283a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15487
@lins05 This is being discussed in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513. One idea is, we might have to a bit
wait until it is confirmed (although I guess it is a soft-yes). Alternatively,
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480#discussion_r83837138
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -537,7 +537,6 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67126 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67126/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`80eed8f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
**[Test build #67122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67122/consoleFull)**
for PR 15508 at commit
[`59b805e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67122/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
**[Test build #67123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67123/consoleFull)**
for PR 15508 at commit
[`2f5664b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15508
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67123/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
