Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #69618 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69618/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
The failure seems to be not related to this pr?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #69618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69618/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69618/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
**[Test build #69615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69615/consoleFull)**
for PR 16120 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16102
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16037
Yes I'm pretty OK with merging this. If you can dig up any results, that's
all the better. Will check in with you next week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69616/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69617/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69620 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69620/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Thank you !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69617/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #69616 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69616/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #69616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69616/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69619 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69619/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16031#discussion_r90754812
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ jQuery.extend( jQuery.fn.dataTableExt.oSort, {
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103#discussion_r90754782
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/english.txt ---
@@ -149,5 +149,58 @@ shan
shouldn
wasn
weren
-won
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90754922
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,31 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
@srowen Do u know qualified maintainers on this component?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69620/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69614/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69611/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69610/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
[SPARK-18678][ML] Skewed feature subsampling in Random forest
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix reservoir sampling bias for small k. An off-by-one error meant that the
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16102
Merged to master, though as I say I don't think the CVE actually impacted
Spark to begin with.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69617/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test failure due to new artifacts
```
+++ b/dev/pr-deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.7
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ arpack_combined_all-0.1.jar
avro-1.7.7.jar
avro-ipc-1.7.7.jar
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r90755993
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/DataPropertyAccumulatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
I'm down the idea of having add and merge not be final with huge warning
signs and we could switch it up in 3.X to be final.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user eyalfa commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r90752975
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ComplexTypes.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16116
Merged to master/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
**[Test build #69615 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69615/consoleFull)**
for PR 16120 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90754731
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,31 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16120
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69615/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged to master. It's a build change and probably fine for 2.1 but it's
non-trivial.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69621 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69621/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69620 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69620/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69622 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69622/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
**[Test build #69623 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69623/consoleFull)**
for PR 15995 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068#discussion_r90756326
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveUDFs.scala
---
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ private[hive] case class HiveGenericUDF(
Github user zhzhan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068#discussion_r90763121
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +488,29 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
@gatorsmile we cannot use deterministic = true/false, as there are
existing udf with deterministic as true, but stateful as true as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3467 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3467/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user nchammas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Update location of Spark YARN shuffle jar
Looking at the distributions provided on spark.apache.org, I see that the
Spark YARN shuffle jar is under `yarn/` and not `lib/`.
You can merge this
Github user nchammas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
cc @vanzin?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Since the current tests pass without this change I'd say that we should add
a test for the behaviour we are planning to support that isn't currently
supported (would also make the purpose of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
**[Test build #69628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/consoleFull)**
for PR 16130 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/FunctionRegistry.java#L1373-L1378
Copied the code from Hive `FunctionRegistry.java`:
```JAVA
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
**[Test build #69628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69628/consoleFull)**
for PR 16130 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16130
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16103#discussion_r90765451
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/stopwords/english.txt ---
@@ -149,5 +149,58 @@ shan
shouldn
wasn
weren
-won
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
My understanding is that the non-deterministic udf does not need to be
stageful, but a stateful udf has to be non-deterministic.
Here is the comments in hive regarding this property
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Could we directly use `@UDFType(deterministic = true/false)`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
Found the link: [HIVE-1994: Support new annotation @UDFType(stateful =
true)](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1994 )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
@felixcheung maybe you can advise me on this. I think this is a correct
fix, but ends up changing the results of decision forests a little bit. The
SparkR test you wrote fails:
```
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Merging to master/2.1/2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16094#discussion_r90764328
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/column.py ---
@@ -298,19 +299,34 @@ def isin(self, *cols):
isNotNull = _unary_op("isNotNull", "True if the current
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16121
I was hesistant with the previous PR since it seemed like we didn't fully
understand why we were changing what we were at the time, I can try and take a
closer look at this over the next few days
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69627/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69625/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69619/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
**[Test build #69619 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69619/consoleFull)**
for PR 16098 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16098
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r90757729
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ComplexTypes.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69625/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
**[Test build #69624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69624/consoleFull)**
for PR 16114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69624/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90758322
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3466/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90756693
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69621/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
This patch fails because hive-0.12 and hive-0.13 doesn't has `getMetaConf`
method.
see [HIVE-7532](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7532),
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90758182
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15995
**[Test build #69623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69623/consoleFull)**
for PR 15995 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r90756702
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,27 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16129
**[Test build #3466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3466/consoleFull)**
for PR 16129 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69622/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
