Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290#discussion_r92953413
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ test_that("repeatedly starting and stopping
SparkSession", {
}
})
Github user itg-abby commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
ping @holdenk, can you take a look at this please? sorry for leaving this
off for so long.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16319#discussion_r92959056
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ private[csv] object
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290#discussion_r92951374
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ test_that("repeatedly starting and stopping
SparkSession", {
}
})
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
@gatorsmile The test error in HiveSparkSubmitSuite seems related. I am
debugging locally
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16324
I was saying we need to create a test case for this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15721
ping @jkbradley @MLnick @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r92955799
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
deployMode <- sparkConfigMap[["spark.submit.deployMode"]]
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r92955787
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -381,6 +381,10 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
deployMode <- sparkConfigMap[["spark.submit.deployMode"]]
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290#discussion_r92958552
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ test_that("repeatedly starting and stopping
SparkSession", {
}
})
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
@shivaram
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #70324 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70324/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16321#discussion_r92953548
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ExecutorAllocationManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -394,3 +398,20 @@ class
Github user cnZach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16293
as there's already some changes implemented in SPARK-8617, close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cnZach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16293
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user WangTaoTheTonic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16331
[SPARK-18920][HISTORYSERVER]Update outdated date formatting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before we show "-" while the timestamp is less than 0, we should
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r92936360
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -148,9 +161,23 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
def
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
[SPARK-18817][SPARKR][SQL] change derby log output and metastore to temp dir
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Passes R `tempdir()` (this is the R session temp dir,
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r92953159
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RRDD.scala ---
@@ -127,6 +127,13 @@ private[r] object RRDD {
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330#discussion_r92953125
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_aFirstTest.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
**[Test build #70325 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70325/testReport)**
for PR 16291 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
@gatorsmile I think I figured out the problem with `HiveSparkSubmitSuite`
but I'm not sure how to solve it. The problem is that in one of the test cases
we check the DB location to be same as
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313#discussion_r92949535
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +133,16 @@ case class BucketSpec(
if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
**[Test build #70317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70317/testReport)**
for PR 16327 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
[SPARK-18808][ML][MLLIB] ml.KMeansModel.transform is very inefficient
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
mllib.KMeansModel.clusterCentersWithNorm is a method than ends up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
**[Test build #70321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70321/testReport)**
for PR 16313 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70321/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
**[Test build #70322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70322/testReport)**
for PR 16291 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
I finished this approach for completeness, but I see that it requires
'fixing' `StreamingKMeansModel` to return a new model instead of strictly
updating its vectors in place. It's not actually a big
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
@cloud-fan
First, if this behavior change is required, we need to document it. I think
this is not clear to external users when they do not realize the underlying
change since
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
**[Test build #70322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70322/testReport)**
for PR 16291 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16291
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70322/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
sure, I'll take a deeper look in a day or 2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70323/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70323 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70323/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70323/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290#discussion_r92949262
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ test_that("repeatedly starting and stopping
SparkSession", {
}
})
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313#discussion_r92949577
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -157,39 +156,74 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
We are facing another behavior inconsistency between `CTAS + Append` and
`Insert Into`, because CTAS always repairt the table but InsertInto does not do
it. Below is an example.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290#discussion_r92935954
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -964,10 +970,16 @@ object StaticSQLConf {
}
}
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
Sure, I will merge this to master/2.1. It renders fine in Chrome for me. I
don't think this is nearly a blocker for 2.1.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
**[Test build #70319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70319/testReport)**
for PR 16329 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70319/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
**[Test build #70321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70321/testReport)**
for PR 16313 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323#discussion_r92942577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ case class Statistics(
}
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
[SPARK-18918] [DOC] Missing in Configuration page
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The configuration page looks messy now, as shown in the nightly build:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70316/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70318/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70320/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70320/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
I'm trying to figure out the cause of this issue but still no progress
until now, could you or @shivaram give some hints or suggestion? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r92936385
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/JobCancellationSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,6 +209,83 @@ class JobCancellationSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70318/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
**[Test build #70320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70320/testReport)**
for PR 16328 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
**[Test build #70317 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70317/testReport)**
for PR 16327 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70317/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16328
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70318/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313#discussion_r92941173
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -133,6 +133,16 @@ case class BucketSpec(
if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313#discussion_r92941135
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -157,39 +156,74 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
**[Test build #70316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70316/testReport)**
for PR 16290 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16327
cc @rxin @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16309
The reason for the update to `scala-xml_2.11-1.0.5.jar` was that once I
updated ScalaTest I got the issue from Jenkins that the dependency list
changed. That's when I was told about
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
**[Test build #70316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70316/testReport)**
for PR 16290 at commit
Github user shenh062326 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16324
Iâm sorry, @rxin, I don't understand what you mean.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
@gatorsmile I think this behavior change is necessary for the new "Scalable
Partition Handling" feature. BTW, the table created by Spark 2.0 can still be
read by Spark 2.1 without `REPAIR TABLE`,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252
merged to master/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16309
You probably have a typo -- `Pkinesis-asl` instead of `-Pkinesis-asl`
locally. This error does not appear in Jenkins output. This still has the
`OutOfMemoryError` and I'm not sure why. It's coming
GitHub user aokolnychyi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
[SPARK-16046][DOCS] Aggregations in the Spark SQL programming guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- A separate subsection for Aggregations under âGetting
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313#discussion_r92941207
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/HadoopFsRelationTest.scala
---
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16329
**[Test build #70319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70319/testReport)**
for PR 16329 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70327 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70327/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
Change LogicalPlan.statistics to def statistics(conf: CatalystConf) could
have two problems:
1. we can't override it as `lazy val`, and `def` means we need to estimate
the plan every time
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323#discussion_r92961666
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +63,37 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
Sure - I'll try and take a look tomorrow just driving back from Monterey
tonight.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM AbderRahman N. Sobh <
notificati...@github.com> wrote:
>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
**[Test build #70324 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70324/testReport)**
for PR 16330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16330
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70324/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
LGTM except a few minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16332
**[Test build #70329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70329/testReport)**
for PR 16332 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16323
**[Test build #70330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70330/testReport)**
for PR 16323 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16313
**[Test build #70331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70331/testReport)**
for PR 16313 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335#discussion_r92968297
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLogSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,14 +209,20 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335
Build started: [TESTS] `org.apache.spark.sql.SQLQuerySuite`
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16245
ping @hvanhovell @rxin Any thing I need to address more? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16263
ping @davies Can you take a look again? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16335#discussion_r92968267
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLogSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,14 +209,20 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14365
ping @cloud-fan @yhuai May you take a look? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70327/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70327/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
