Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73491 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73491/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73493 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user taroplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
@holdenk @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
@mridulm thanks, I have changed the code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103104003
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -243,13 +243,20 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103104024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -662,6 +663,101 @@ class FileStreamSourceSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73490 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73490/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
**[Test build #73487 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73487/testReport)**
for PR 17070 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73494/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987#discussion_r103104036
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -662,6 +663,101 @@ class FileStreamSourceSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73489 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73489/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73485 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73485/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73486/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
**[Test build #73493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/testReport)**
for PR 16976 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73493/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #73495 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73495/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73490 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73490/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
I left single usage in `JavaSaveLoadSuite`. I believe this should be fine
for testing the deprecated ones.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73491/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73486 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73486/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
Added support for Java Maps with support for pre-allocation (capacity
argument on constructor) and sensible defaults for interfaces/abstract classes.
Also includes implicit encoders.
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
Thanks for working on this. It's been awhile since I looked at the
classloader bits so I'd need to refresh my memory a bit, but regardless this PR
probably needs better tests - specifically
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73488 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73488/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73488/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16929
**[Test build #73491 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73491/testReport)**
for PR 16929 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73487/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73490/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16987
**[Test build #73492 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73492/testReport)**
for PR 16987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73489/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73485/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user taroplus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17074
[SPARK-18646][REPL] Set parent classloader as null for ExecutorClassLoader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
By default, a class loader will have java's system class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73485 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73485/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73483 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73483/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Thank you, yes just last night I put together some changes to fix this too,
because I added some problems when I changed to Java 8 syntax. Maybe you can
apply
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072#discussion_r103099295
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/SparkFirehoseListener.java ---
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ public void onEvent(SparkListenerEvent event) { }
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73482/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73482 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73482/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73489 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73489/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
@srowen thank you for the comments! I was trying to tackle SPARK-19721,
sorry the summary just said "WIP" without a JIRA number; adding JIRA number
back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73488 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73488/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73479/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73481/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73482 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73482/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17073
OK, but you're un-documenting an invariant that is still supposed to be
true. Your new invariant is the same as the first too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102422
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +274,37 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102416
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
package
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +274,37 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102394
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102389
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,7 +226,15 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072
**[Test build #73486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73486/testReport)**
for PR 17072 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103102481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -195,6 +196,11 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
**[Test build #73487 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73487/testReport)**
for PR 17070 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072#discussion_r103099508
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/SparkFirehoseListener.java ---
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ public void onEvent(SparkListenerEvent event) { }
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17073
This has no explanation. This is also copied from the Android OSS project,
so I don't think I'd change the comments without reason. It'd be easier to
update later if needed
---
If your project is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17073
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user xiaoyesoso commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17073
@srowen
The explanations are for TimSort from Android OSSãThe code has bug ([see
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73484/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73484 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73484/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73484 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73484/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73483/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098803
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
package
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098815
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +274,37 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070
This is changing a lot of stuff to barely improve an error, and the PR has
problems. I don't think this is worthwhile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098735
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ private[kafka010] class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098721
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,7 +226,15 @@ class KafkaSourceSuite
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098789
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -195,6 +196,11 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17070#discussion_r103098816
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -268,6 +274,37 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <: AnyRef
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17072#discussion_r103099256
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ public void writeTo(ByteBuffer buffer) {
GitHub user xiaoyesoso opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17073
[SPARK-5984]Add notes and fix puzzling notes
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Notes
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Oh, no. I think I updated all instances. Let me maybe leave one case in
`JsonSuite`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
**[Test build #73483 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73483/testReport)**
for PR 17071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
I decided to provide a few more bencharks in order to alleviate some of the
concerns raised by @srowen.
To reproduce the results add the following snippet in the ALSSuite class:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17067
**[Test build #73494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73494/testReport)**
for PR 17067 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
**[Test build #73496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73496/testReport)**
for PR 16991 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73496/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16991
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16782
**[Test build #3586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3586/testReport)**
for PR 16782 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
**[Test build #73497 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73497/testReport)**
for PR 16944 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944
Thanks for the thorough feedback.
In the latest update I refactored ```convertToLogicalRelation()``` to
update the schema of the ```catalogTable``` field of the value it returns
whenever a
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17060
Thank you @srowen @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
