Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r122092151
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ class SparkSession private(
* @since 2.0.0
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Can you put a screenshot of the UI up, for both join and aggregate?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user yhqairqq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18311
Branch 2.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18202
oops - found this
https://github.com/apache/spark/blame/ae33abf71b353c638487948b775e966c7127cd46/docs/sql-programming-guide.md#L1001
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
@cloud-fan thanks for reviewing, code has updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r122122675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryManagerSuite.scala
---
@@ -239,6 +237,40 @@ class
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
[SPARK-20980][DOCS] update doc to reflect multiLine change
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
doc only change
## How was this patch tested?
manually
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18084
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17723#discussion_r122096373
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -504,10 +504,10 @@ spark.yarn.access.hadoopFileSystems
hdfs://ireland.example.org:8020/,webhdfs://f
```
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r122098055
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,56 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
**[Test build #78073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78073/testReport)**
for PR 18300 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
**[Test build #78075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78075/testReport)**
for PR 18284 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
**[Test build #78071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78071/testReport)**
for PR 18299 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78070/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78071/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
**[Test build #78070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78070/testReport)**
for PR 18299 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309#discussion_r122102110
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -81,6 +83,19 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18302
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18302
**[Test build #78074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78074/testReport)**
for PR 18302 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78075/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r122114390
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -573,8 +586,11 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18290
@jerryshao Thank you for your suggestion, since this PR is aimed to resolve
the conflict of spark configuration, I think the user behavior you described is
out of scope here.
---
If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r122116294
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -573,8 +586,11 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +154,23 @@ class TreeNodeSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78079/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120851
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ case class ExpressionInMap(map:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +154,23 @@ class TreeNodeSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r122122817
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -62,13 +62,63 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r122122765
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r122122867
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
**[Test build #78084 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78084/testReport)**
for PR 18312 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18262
cc @viirya here too. (This one is similar one with few PRs you and I are
reviewing).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18302
**[Test build #78074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78074/testReport)**
for PR 18302 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18290
@jiangxb1987 , I think using environment variable to check if there's
number of same-node workers connected id potentially vulnerable, user can
manually start worker one by one without setting
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309#discussion_r122102333
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -81,6 +83,19 @@ case class
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
Oh, yes, I am closing it, will reopen it when we have another idea.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
**[Test build #78078 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78078/testReport)**
for PR 18310 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
The screenshot of BroadcastHashJoin:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/68855/27163920-324127ea-51bd-11e7-8bee-924a20e161b8.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Can you add a test case? In the test, we can add partitions with different
paths by ALTER TABLE SET LOCATION command. I think that can reproduce your
scenario, right?
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
**[Test build #78081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78081/testReport)**
for PR 18284 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18202
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18202
ah lucky :) merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user mbasmanova opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
[SPARK-21079] [SQL] Calculate total size of a partition table as a sum of
individual partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When calculating total size of a
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309#discussion_r122102041
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -109,16 +124,16 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
**[Test build #78073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78073/testReport)**
for PR 18300 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78077/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r122116160
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,58 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r122116053
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,58 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
**[Test build #78077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78077/testReport)**
for PR 18299 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Please explain the failed scenario in PR description. That's why our test
cases cannot catch it and we need to test it manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ case class ExpressionInMap(map:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18231
**[Test build #78079 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78079/testReport)**
for PR 18231 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120741
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -340,11 +340,21 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
Closing for now, since @sameeragarwal said it might be useful in physical
planning in the future.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
**[Test build #78082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78082/testReport)**
for PR 18284 at commit
Github user liyichao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18144
As the idea is not that good, this is closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user liyichao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18144
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78073/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301#discussion_r122114832
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/HashedRelation.scala
---
@@ -573,8 +586,11 @@ private[execution] final class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309#discussion_r122116932
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -81,6 +83,19 @@ case class AnalyzeTableCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r122116812
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,58 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300#discussion_r122121031
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1764,6 +1765,58 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284#discussion_r122120954
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNodeSuite.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +154,23 @@ class TreeNodeSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
**[Test build #78084 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78084/testReport)**
for PR 18312 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78084/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18284
**[Test build #78075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78075/testReport)**
for PR 18284 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78076/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r122091309
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryManager.scala
---
@@ -321,6 +321,17 @@ class StreamingQueryManager
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18084
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18309
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
**[Test build #78076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78076/testReport)**
for PR 18300 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18299
**[Test build #78077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78077/testReport)**
for PR 18299 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18311
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user aray commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306#discussion_r122112073
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ class SparkSession private(
* @since 2.0.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18300
**[Test build #78076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78076/testReport)**
for PR 18300 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
The screenshot of HashAggregate:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/68855/27163956-5a0b5e6c-51bd-11e7-9159-f4962ac1bc36.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
The screenshot of ShuffledHashJoin:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/68855/27163988-86e82492-51bd-11e7-866e-199467c35817.png;>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78078/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18310
**[Test build #78078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78078/testReport)**
for PR 18310 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18075#discussion_r122122445
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -233,10 +222,118 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18046
**[Test build #78083 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78083/testReport)**
for PR 18046 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18312
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18298
**[Test build #78067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78067/testReport)**
for PR 18298 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18298
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78067/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18303
@gatorsmile Sure, let me do it later!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18308
LGTM. BTW can you please complement the PR description, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
1 - 100 of 445 matches
Mail list logo
