Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
**[Test build #84018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84018/testReport)**
for PR 19776 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
**[Test build #84000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84000/testReport)**
for PR 19780 at commit
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19390
@susanxhuynh @ArtRand.
In order to deal with stripping allocation info for non multi-role
schedulers:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@mesos.apache.org/msg38329.html
I suggest to go with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370#discussion_r151865048
--- Diff: bin/find-spark-home.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19630
Thanks @HyukjinKwon!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84000/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370#discussion_r151864995
--- Diff: bin/find-spark-home.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user uzadude commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683#discussion_r151868042
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -59,15 +61,23 @@ case class GenerateExec(
generator:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #84001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84001/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #84002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84002/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370#discussion_r151880938
--- Diff: bin/find-spark-home.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84001/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #84001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84001/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19357
This pull request was created while there were several dependencies that
had not been defined yet. As a result, it has caused many conflicts. I
decided to close this pull request and start a clean
Github user jsnowacki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370#discussion_r151876330
--- Diff: bin/find-spark-home.cmd ---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+@echo off
+
+rem
+rem Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user ron8hu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19783
support histogram in filter cardinality estimation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Histogram is effective in dealing with skewed distribution. After we
generate
Github user ron8hu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19357
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
**[Test build #84004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84004/testReport)**
for PR 19370 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19783
**[Test build #84003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84003/testReport)**
for PR 19783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19783
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84003/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19783
**[Test build #84003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84003/testReport)**
for PR 19783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #84002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84002/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84002/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Looks like a fair config as we seems don't have a way to disable daemon
usage.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19390#discussion_r151862273
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -228,24 +254,15 @@ trait
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83993/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
**[Test build #83993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83993/testReport)**
for PR 19782 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
**[Test build #83999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83999/testReport)**
for PR 19782 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19767
Would it be better to replace `"SPARK-"` in test case for (#15620
#18972 #18641) with this JIRA number?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
**[Test build #84000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84000/testReport)**
for PR 19780 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
cc @cloud-fan @kiszk
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Can you add a test case?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
@kiszk I added a test. But I think after #19767 is merged, the generated
codes will be changed too. I may need to adjust the test case after that.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83999/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
**[Test build #83999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83999/testReport)**
for PR 19782 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Thank you @viirya and @ueshin.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19763#discussion_r151901370
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -485,4 +485,13 @@ package object config {
"array in the
Github user vinodkc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19779#discussion_r151902033
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -89,6 +90,8 @@ class HiveFileFormat(fileSinkConf:
Github user jliwork commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
@viirya I'm fine with backport to 2.2 unless anyone objects.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19779
**[Test build #84011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84011/testReport)**
for PR 19779 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
@jliwork Let's see what @cloud-fan @felixcheung think about it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
**[Test build #84008 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84008/testReport)**
for PR 19780 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19741
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19741
**[Test build #84007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84007/testReport)**
for PR 19741 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19741
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84007/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19769#discussion_r151909614
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedColumnReader.java
---
@@ -298,7 +304,10 @@ private void
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19750
lgtm
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84010/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19786
[SPARK-22559][CORE]history server: handle exception on opening corrupted
listing.ldb
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently history server v2 failed to start if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
**[Test build #84017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84017/testReport)**
for PR 19776 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19784
[SPARK-22557][TESTS] Use ThreadSignaler explicitly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
ScalaTest 3.0 uses an implicit `Signaler`. This PR makes it sure all Spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #84006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84006/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19774#discussion_r151892351
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -689,6 +689,11 @@ case class DescribeColumnCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84006/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #84006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84006/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19784
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
This affects correctness, should we also backport to 2.2?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19782
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
**[Test build #84012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84012/testReport)**
for PR 19773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #84013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84013/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84008/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19785
**[Test build #84014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84014/testReport)**
for PR 19785 at commit
GitHub user ScrapCodes opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19785
[MINOR][doc] The left navigation bar should be fixed with respect to
scrolling.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A minor CSS style change to make Left navigation bar
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
**[Test build #84009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84009/testReport)**
for PR 19780 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19769#discussion_r151908974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetInteroperabilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -87,4 +95,109 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84009/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19779
**[Test build #84011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84011/testReport)**
for PR 19779 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
**[Test build #84012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84012/testReport)**
for PR 19773 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10572
@HyukjinKwon
To merge small files, should I tune `spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes`?
But IIUC it only works for `FileSourceScanExec`. So when I select from hive
table, it doesn't work.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776
**[Test build #84010 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84010/testReport)**
for PR 19776 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19786
**[Test build #84015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84015/testReport)**
for PR 19786 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19787
[SPARK-22541][SQL] Explicitly claim that Python udfs can't be conditional
executed with short-curcuit evaluation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Besides conditional
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19787
cc @HyukjinKwon @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19787
**[Test build #84016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84016/testReport)**
for PR 19787 at commit
GitHub user yucai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
[SPARK-9853][Core] Optimize shuffle fetch of contiguous partition IDs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Optimize shuffle fetch of contiguous partition IDs
## How
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jliwork commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776#discussion_r151920126
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -497,7 +497,11 @@ object DataSourceStrategy {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776#discussion_r151920212
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -497,7 +497,11 @@ object DataSourceStrategy {
Github user jliwork commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19776#discussion_r151901160
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -497,7 +497,10 @@ object DataSourceStrategy {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Seems there is no explicit objection for dropping it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19784
Oh, thank you so much, @HyukjinKwon , @srowen , and @jiangxb1987 .
Yes. This will make our build more stable.
---
-
To
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19785
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19785
**[Test build #84014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84014/testReport)**
for PR 19785 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19779
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19779
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/84011/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19773
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
