>
> A quick look at riak_test it seems that the `return_body` parameter is
> generally supported for both HTTP and PB now. I wasn’t aware of that.
I’m not sure into which releases the feature has made it, but bewarned: if it
works at all, return_body only works for system indexes: $bucket and $
"young_vclock":20}}
>
>
> I repeated with the steps as mentioning at previous email, I got the
> following results :
>
> When response of riakc_pb_socket:modify_type are
> {error,<<"{error,locked}">>}, I have to wait some seconds to call
>
; {update,{<<"end_time">>,register},{assign,<<"dont_use">>}},{update,{<<"currency">>,register},{assign,<<"cad">>}},
> >>> > > {update,{<<"created_time_dt">>,register},
> >>> > > {ass
t;<"0-634736bc14e0bd3ed7e3fe0f1ee64443">>}},
>>>>>> {update,{<<"maintain_mode_b">>,register},{assign,<<"false">>}},
>>>>>> {update,{<<"id">>,register},
>>>>>> {assign,<&l
Originally I suspected the context which allows Riak to resolve conflicts was
not present in your data, but I see it in your map structure. Thanks for
supplying such a detailed description.
How fast is your turnaround time between an update and a fetch? Even if the
cluster is healthy it’s not i
coverage query, but if it’s leveldb at least you will seek to the
> start of the bucket and iterate over only the keys in that bucket.
>
> Cheers
>
> Russell
>
>> On 8 Dec 2016, at 21:19, John Daily wrote:
>>
>> The size of the bucket has no real impact on th
The size of the bucket has no real impact on the cost of a list keys operation
because each key on the cluster must be examined to determined whether it
resides in the relevant bucket.
-John
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Arun Rajagopalan
> wrote:
>
> Hello Riak Users
>
> I have a use case w
One of the catches regarding the quantum limit is that unless the
query starts exactly on a boundary, the effective limit is one fewer
because it is determined by the number of partitions the query has to
touch.
I suspect that's the behavior you're seeing.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 17, 2016,
s.
>
> Are others who need both a general KV store and the TS functionality running
> multiple clusters to handle this use case?
>
> Thanks for the quick reply!
>
>
> Damion
>
>> On Oct 12, 2016, at 11:53 AM, John Daily wrote:
>>
>> We have not
We have not done any work to support the multi-backend, hence the error you’re
seeing. TS depends exclusively on leveldb.
We’re not recommending the use of KV functionality in the TS product yet,
because the latter is still changing rapidly and we will need to go back and
fix some basic KV mech
You should find most of what you need here:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/using/security/
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 17, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
Hi all,
I have a cluster of 5 nodes connected to each other and now I want to use
UFW to deny any external incoming traffic i
We punted on a bucket type API with Riak 2.0 because we tied authorization
heavily to bucket types and didn’t have the time to unravel that knot. Since
then we have yet to prioritize it.
I will make sure this is on the roadmap.
-John
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Nguyen, Kyle wrote:
>
> Hi a
This smells like a clock problem. Are you confident all of your servers’ clocks
are set to the same time?
Updates can be treacherous if clocks are not synchronized and multiple writes
to the same key occur in a period of time short enough to fit within the clock
skew.
I wrote about this after
retrieved from the <<"відро"/utf8>> bucket.
-John Daily
jda...@basho.com
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Fasil K wrote:
> Thanks Daniel. This means a lot
>
> With Regards,
>
> Fasil K
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Abrahamsson <
> da
One of our engineers has been working on 18 for a while now. He’s not around
today, but hopefully will chime in soon.
-John
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Victor Medina wrote:
>
> =)first of all thanks!
>
> Im building it with OTP17. Everything seems to be just fine with 17 so far...
> Thin
That’s correct: upgrades to either 2.0.x or 2.1.x are supported from the
1.4 series.
Side note: I definitely recommend testing the upgrade process in a QA
environment first.
-John
On Aug 5, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Sujay Mansingh wrote:
Hello all, I have a 5 node riak cluster, all nodes running 1.4
Riak does not currently try to protect you against dumping 2 gallons of water
in a 1 gallon jug, so each node will write data until it can’t.
-John
On Apr 23, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Alex De la rosa wrote:
> Cool, thank you :) however, is true that if 4 nodes are 1TB and the other one
> is 2TB; th
provided in an Erlang array, with square brackets
and a period terminating it.
See http://pastebin.com/90gh6amg.
-John
On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
> 2015-04-17 17:04 GMT+05:00 John Daily :
>> Unfortunately it’s very easy to introduce syntax errors in
Unfortunately it’s very easy to introduce syntax errors into Erlang
configuration files (and tricky to diagnose them without Erlang experience),
which is why we’re moving toward the newer sysctl-style files like riak.conf.
The example in the documentation looks ok; can we see a copy of your
adv
Agreed: exposing any database directly to the Internet is risky, and Riak’s
security introduced in 2.0 doesn’t really change that.
-John
On Apr 16, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Alexander Sicular wrote:
> That should work but are you sure you want to expose your riak server to the
> Internet? I would rec
Both LevelDB and Bitcask are optimized for smaller objects, so neither will be
particularly good at it.
Again: this is possible but discouraged.
-John
On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:01 AM, SeanProtain wrote:
> HI John,
>
> Thank you! Then which backend I should choose to store images?
>
> Subject:
You certainly can with some careful tuning.
However, if Riak is being used for heavy traffic loads, you’ll likely see poor
performance as a consequence. Those large objects effectively clog the pipes
temporarily.
Hopefully someone can chime in with tuning recommendations, but make certain
allo
Daniel, you may be aware of this, but a 3-node Riak cluster is not
recommended and may be playing a minor role in your resource problems.
Every request will hit every server (except for some requests that are
being made twice against a single server, making I/O that much worse), and
depending on yo
otaryPhone
>
> On Jan 24, 2015, at 08:55, Никита Нежевский > wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply, I will try to use post-commit hooks. But is it
> possible to realize this possibility at riak-erlang-client?
>
> Sat Jan 24 2015 at 0:12:57, John Daily >:
>
>&g
You may wish to take a look at the support for post-commit hooks:
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/commit-hooks/
-John
On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Никита Нежевский wrote:
> Hello.
> I've used riak for online processing of incoming data and faced with problem.
> I've used riak-er
Agreed, that’s a useful article, highly recommended.
-John
On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Troy Melhase wrote:
> Lots of insight here:
>
> https://highlyscalable.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/nosql-data-modeling-techniques/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:47 PM, John Daily
I’ve written a bit about modeling patterns at
http://basho.com/riak-development-anti-patterns/
I expanded a bit on it in contributions to the latest version of Eric Redmond’s
outstanding http://littleriakbook.com (make sure to grab one of the downloads,
the HTML is out of date).
-John
On Nov
The n_val represents the number of copies of the data, regardless of the number
of servers in the cluster. If you have n_val=3 and only 1 server, 3 copies of
each piece of data will be on that server (and performance will be generally
abysmal because every read and write request will effectively
If you can help us what goal is trying to be achieved by taking that
approach, perhaps we can refute the logic (or find a better solution). It
sounds suspiciously like someone is trying to avoid the complexities of
siblings and conflict resolution (a goal which your architecture doesn't
actually ac
Basho only tests and supports upgrades 2 major releases forward, so 1.3 or
1.4 can be upgraded to 2.0, but 1.2 may or may not work.
I'd strongly recommend upgrading to 1.4.10 before moving to 2.0.
Some useful links:
* http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/upgrading/rolling-upgrades/
* http://docs
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Dmitri Zagidulin
wrote:
> If you're running a single-node Riak instance to start with (such as a
> prototype web app), but there's the possibility of expanding the cluster
> and adding other nodes, you should run with n_val=3. (It's not recommended
> to change th
Siblings are resolved automatically by Riak when using our data types, thus
the requirement that allow_mult=true.
-John
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was trying to create a bucket-type using the datatype MAP and it didn't
> allow me to create it with
I don't have benchmarks to discuss query performance for different tools at
different sizes, but I'd like to point out that the ultimate search tool
for Riak is to not search at all.
Riak Search, 2i, MapReduce are all capable tools, but they don't scale
nearly as well as straight key/value request
This blog post on configuring S3 clients to work with CS may be useful:
http://basho.com/riak-cs-proxy-vs-direct-configuration/
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Andrew Stone wrote:
Hi Charles,
AFAIK we haven't ever tested Riak Cs with the MapR connector. However, if
MapR works
We are disabling the backup component in riak-admin in 2.0.
Instead, we recommend following the detailed instructions in
http://docs.basho.com/riak/2.0.0/ops/running/backups/
-John
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Alfonso Hooker wrote:
> I am looking for some information regarding the backup
Weighted claim is indeed on the wishlist, but I don't believe it has yet
been assigned to any particular planned release.
-John
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Thomas Santero wrote:
> Hi Chaim,
>
> Inline
>
> On Jul 6, 2014, at 1:13 AM, Chaim Solomon
> wrote:
>
> I don't think I was quite cle
I don't have time at the moment to respond in more detail, I'm afraid, but
you should find this blog series quite useful.
http://basho.com/understanding-riaks-configurable-behaviors-part-1/
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2014, at 5:56 AM, Alex De la rosa
wrote:
Hi there,
Can somebody help me
Siblings in CS are strictly for internal purposes, and handled by the
CS layer. They aren't exposed to S3 (or similar) clients.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Lee Sylvester wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> So, I'm using a Riak CS cluster and interfacing with it using Erlcloud. My
I strongly recommend sticking with the 1.4 series until 2.0 is formally
released.
The 2.0 features are great, but making certain that upgrades will go smoothly
is a top priority for every major release of Riak, and this will be no
exception. You can upgrade when the time is right for your needs
Will be starting at ~3:30 Eastern.
http://youtu.be/uDR-sdBCPug
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
We pushed this week’s hangout back a bit due to scheduling conflicts. I’ll send
out a link after 3pm.
Today’s topic: data modeling. Don’t miss it.
As a reminder, previous hangouts can be viewed at our YouTube page (and that’s
another way to watch today’s live without waiting for me to send a di
week...).
John Daily
twitter.com/macintux
---
Riak Recap for January 24th - February 11th
===
Riak CS 1.4.4 (bugfixes only) was released.
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2014-February/014599.html
-
After asking around a bit, I think we’re likely to remove that recommendation
from the documentation.
Tuning is always a bit of a dark art, so as always your mileage may vary, but
there doesn’t seem to be any real advantage to lowering the thread count.
Thanks for raising the issue.
-John
On
A minor Riak CS bugfix release, 1.4.4, is available. There are no Stanchion or
Riak CS Control updates, so versions 1.4.3 and 1.0.2 remain the latest releases
of those components.
http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/Riak-CS-Re
Replies inline.
(Thanks to Russell for the link to my blog series, but honestly, as I now
re-read the section on conflict resolution, I’m unhappy with it. It’s a very
confusing topic and I regret not doing a better job of clarifying it. This
answer will undoubtedly also be more confusing than I
If you’ve been a part of the Riak community for a while, you won’t want to miss
today’s Community Hangout. Hector Castro and I will be joined by two people who
have been among the more prominent faces for Basho for a very long time: Andy
Gross and Mark Phillips. We’ll take a look back at where w
We’ll be talking CorrugatedIron with Jeremiah Peschka and David Rusek at 2
Eastern. Learn more about sausage-making in the client libraries.
https://plus.google.com/events/cmovsvget093sa91rjas3ac4a3s
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists
Welcome to the first 2014 Riak Recap.
Since last we spoke, Riak 1.4.6 was unveiled, along with an updated Chef
cookbook:
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-December/014327.html
- http://community.opscode.com/cookbooks/riak
We've also hosted another Riak Community
That'd be version 1.4.6.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Matthew Von-Maszewski wrote:
>
> P.S. Unrelated to your question: Riak 1.4.4 is available for download. It
> has a couple of nice bug fixes for leveldb.
___
riak-users mai
Note this:
{multi_backend, [
%% Here's where you set the individual multiplexed
backends
{<<"eleveldb_mult">>, riak_kv_eleveldb_backend, [
{data_root, "
I could be wrong, but I believe there’s metadata overhead for each sibling, so
even if all data in all siblings needs to be retained, it’s still more
efficient to merge and save them as one object.
-John
On Dec 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Stone wrote:
> Think of an object with thousands of s
Riak users,
Riak 1.4.6 was pushed to the apt and yum repositories and is now available for
download from docs.basho.com.
Along with bug fixes, the most notable changes involve 2i. We have reverted to
unsorted key lists by default for better performance, added regular expression
filters for ran
Alex Moore and I provided some general time series advice and links on
StackOverflow recently:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19384686/what-is-the-most-efficient-way-to-store-time-series-in-riak-with-heavy-reads
Broadly speaking, issuing dynamic queries via MapReduce is going to be less
des
for a great 2013.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Technical difficulties, new link
http://youtu.be/n8m8xlizekg
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
We’ll be continuing our discussions of Riak 2.0: specifically, security and
conflict resolution. 2pm Eastern.
http://youtu.be/_QomrZc29fw
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/ria
>
> 2) You could set your default backend in the confgs to use multi-backend.
> When it comes time to age out your data, you can switch the backend on a
> bucket by bucket basis and hope for the best. This isn't supported or tested
> by Basho (as far as I know), so you'll be on your own on this
-Release-Notes/
Downloads: http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
Thanks.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
allow_mult=true is the recommended approach for addressing conflict resolution;
when multiple writes to the same object are received and vector clocks cannot
determine a causal history, all copies of the writes are retained for future
merging/selection by the application. We are planning to make
r my use case, but they
> seem overkill for simple append operations when I don't need delete
> functionality. Creating your own CRDTs are trivial if you never need to
> delete.
>
> Thoughts are welcome,
> Jason
> From: John Daily
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013
Forcing siblings other than for testing purposes is not typically a good idea;
as you indicate, the object size can easily become a problem as all siblings
will live inside the same Riak value.
Your counter-example sounds a lot like a use case for server-side CRDTs; data
structures that allow t
(And the inverse would also be interesting to know.)
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:41 PM, John Daily wrote:
> If you upload the files from Windows, and download them to the Ubuntu VM, do
> inconsistencies ever appear?
>
> -John
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Engel Sanchez
If you upload the files from Windows, and download them to the Ubuntu VM, do
inconsistencies ever appear?
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Engel Sanchez wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> This looks puzzling. Just from looking at the code we haven't found anything
> suspicious. Would you mind postin
And so it begins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxzGY6_DnQU
-John
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Updating any key without supplying a vector clock is guaranteed to create a
sibling.
-John
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Mark A. Basil, Jr. wrote:
> Is there some method that is either guaranteed or very highly likely to
> create Siblings of an object (that isn’t a counter)? I would like to ha
The Basho TE team is kicking off a new weekly forum an hour from now: the Riak
Community Hangout[1].
Most[2] Fridays at 11am Pacific/2pm Eastern/7pm[3] GMT we'll be holding a 15-30
minute, development-focused Google Hangout, with the video to be posted later
on YouTube[4].
A primary focus for
com/index.html (for those of you who haven't seen
> > Salt Stack yet)
> >
> > Basho now has a dedicated conference page on Lanyrd, if you're curious
> > where you can find us next
> > - http://lanyrd.com/basho/
> >
> > While we're talking abo
solutions
-
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-October/013475.html
Drew Searcy posted a blog on troubleshooting Riak daemon startup problems
- http://drewsearcy.com/troubleshooting-riak-startup/
John Daily captured some of the differences between Riak and Riak CS
How well-synchronized are your system clocks?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Greenstein wrote:
>
>
> We’re doing new puts with a blank vector clock. There are several seconds
> between updates to the object though.
>
> Dave
>
>
>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Andrew Th
If you really want an S3 API layer around NFS, I suspect you'd be better off
taking the code from Riak CS and creating your own solution than attempting
this approach.
One example of how this would run into trouble: if any server fails, nearly
every large object would be unavailable because of
Replies inline
On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:49 AM, kzhang wrote:
> I think the below setting is what we want to use for our environment
>> r = 1
>> notfound_ok=false
>> basic_quorum = true
>>
>> the client gets notfound if the first two replies are notfound? if the
>> first
>> reply is found, the clie
Responses inline.
On Oct 11, 2013, at 7:10 PM, kzhang wrote:
> I read the documentation again
> (http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/references/http/fetch-object/).
>
> r - (read quorum) how many replicas need to agree when retrieving the object
> (default is defined by the bucket)
Not agree
oads: http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/riakcs-downloads/
Thanks.
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist, Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
What you saw is actually quite typical when using R=1.
When you turn off a node, Riak's sloppy quorum behavior will kick in and hand
off some of your read requests to an empty data partition to supplement the two
remaining partitions that still have a copy. Since the partition is empty, it
can
Riak Recap returns after a busy couple of weeks, including one of the more
spectacular developer conferences anywhere in the world, Strange Loop. If
you've not yet attended, you're missing out.
Garrett Eardley of Riot Games talked at Strange Loop about migrating from MySQL
to Riak for scale; we
Summer draws to its unofficial close in the northern hemisphere, but that just
means tech conferences are spinning back up. We know RICON will be high on the
priority list for anyone reading this; check out the speakers list and ask
yourself if you really want to miss a chance to bend the ear of
The Recap took an (unplanned) August vacation, rather like the rest of the
civilized world, but we're back.
The most important news: RICON West tickets are still available, but early bird
ticket sales end Thursday morning (US). If you've been to a RICON, you know why
you shouldn't miss this; if
ntact us on this list or via issues on GitHub if you have questions or
concerns.
[1] https://github.com/basho
[2] https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/wiki/Git-Flow
[3] http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
[4] https://github.com/basho/riak/wiki/Basho-repository-management
-Jo
in us for free food and drinks on August 27th.
http://www.meetup.com/DFW-Riak-Meetup/events/134337442/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo
gt; Paul Ingalls
> Founder & CEO Fanzo
> p...@fanzo.me
> @paulingalls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
>
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 5:08 PM, John Daily wrote:
>
>> 50k definitely is a fair few. What's the objective for that many, if I may
>&g
Maybe 50k or so...
Paul Ingalls
Founder & CEO Fanzo
p...@fanzo.me
@paulingalls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulingalls
On Aug 2, 2013, at 3:54 PM, John Daily wrote:
Excellent news. How many buckets with custom settings did you create?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Paul
Excellent news. How many buckets with custom settings did you create?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Paul Ingalls wrote:
For those interested, I identified my performance problem.
I was creating a lot of buckets, and the properties did not match the
default bucket properties o
Greetings, Riak world.
It's time to say farewell to July. There will be many opportunities to see the
Basho crew out and about in August, so I've included the next couple of weeks
below, and you can always visit http://basho.com/events to see what's coming to
your community.
Don't forget that
atest/ops/advanced/riak-control/
[1] http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/running/rolling-upgrades/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo
riak cs for large files (50MB-15GB) is it possible to raise
> the chunk size up to these Filesizes, to prevent the system from heavy
> network traffic?
Definitely not. Erlang's distribution protocol will behave badly with objects
that large.
Per http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Backups/, you need not only
Bitcask data but also ring data and configuration.
-John
On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
> Here is what I am doing: on OSX
>
> # Install riak on my local OSX development box
> brew install riak
>
>
A couple of quick notes (that may be perfectly obvious, but just in case) to
augment Joe's response:
Nodes will have to be restarted before those properties take effect.
Increasing n_val on buckets is risky: old keys will still only live on the
original n_val (smaller) number of nodes, but requ
> Correct. With lww = true, the vector clocks will be ignored and the
> most-recent timestamp will win. Is this not what you're seeing?
To be precise, the most recent timestamp will win as long as allow_mult=false.
lww=true just optimizes the code path a bit.
http://basho.com/understanding-riak
Two important points:
First, n_val determines how many partitions (or virtual nodes) the data will be
distributed to. The ring size determines how many partitions exist, and should
be a much larger number than the number of servers your cluster will run on.
Riak's default ring size is 64, so de
r.
If you have interesting Riak experiences to share (or other distributed systems
theory/learnings), please contact us. Your active involvement can only improve
RICON.
CFP: http://ricon.io/blog/2013-06-03-West-cfp-officially-open.html
RICON West: http://ricon.io/west.html
-John Daily
Technical E
=pr=quorum.
>
> Immutable values is a much better way of putting it, although I technically
> need deletion as well for this particular example.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:24 PM, John Daily wrote:
> A few quick thoughts...
>
> W
and pr=quorum (which would mean that attempting to write the same key
in a partitioned scenario would fail unless a majority of the primary vnodes
are reachable).
Hopefully someone else who's given this some thought in the past will jump in;
I'll make further inquiries tomorrow.
-John
Thanks for the kind words, Jeremiah.
Jeremy, if you find anything that's wrong with that description of sibling
behavior, please let me know. It's always possible I missed something
important.
-John
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Jeremiah Peschka wrote:
> John Daily (@macintux) wrote
As you may have noticed, this week on the blog I've been tackling the deeper
meanings of various behavioral configuration parameters, ranging from ye olde
r/w parameters to the much more obscure basic_quorum.
After posting today's missive, the esteemed Andrew Thompson noticed that
something I d
We're back with yet another Recap.
Big news for the week: SoftLayer now offers Riak and Riak Enterprise out of the
box in their bare metal server hosting environment. Big news for everyone at
RICON East or NYC environs is that SoftLayer is sponsoring the after party, so
if you somehow can't mak
om/Atlanta-Riak-Meetup/events/112848852/
Eric Redmond will be talking about Riak at Railsberry in Krakow
- April 23-24 / http://railsberry.com/
Steve Vinoski and Andy Gross will be talking at GOTO Chicago, where
you can also find a Basho booth with John Daily talking Riak, Erlang,
or chromatic harmon
e hardware currently in your account if you're not careful.)
[1] https://github.com/basho/basho_bench
[2] http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/cookbooks/Benchmarking/
[3] http://www.baremetalcloud.com/
-John Daily
Technical Evangelist
Basho Technologies
___
Actually, I believe the document is correct; there is a
riak_cs_kv_multi_backend module in the CS tree which appears to be forked from
riak_kv_multi_backend.
In general, though, you're more than welcome to file tickets against the
documentation set via github: https://github.com/basho/basho_doc
in Texas this year, and I'll definitely be
looking for users to talk about their experiences with Riak. Please let me know
if you'd be interested in sharing your pain points and successes (not
necessarily in that order).
And, of course, the essentials: free food and swag.
-John Daily
Reminder: early bird pricing for RICON East ends Friday, as does the CFP.
* ---> http://ricon.io/east.html
And don't forget: hoodies!
John
twitter.com/macintux
Riak Recap for March 6 - 12
===
1) A new release of the Perl library Net::Riak has been released. It
now suppo
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
